Thermal control canister

An apparatus for maintaining a heat dissipating load at a substantially constant temperature, and more particularly, to such an apparatus where in variable conductance heat pipes control the radiating area of a radiator is described

Structural heat pipe

When solar heat is absorbed through the structural support member it is fed directly to a heat pipe. Energy is transferred by heat pipe around to a cooler spot before it can find its way to the structure. This prevents local hot spots from occurring on the sun side and excessive heat leaks on the dark side

AIMP-D thermal design report

AIMP-D spacecraft thermal design and mission planning repor

Telerobotic electronic materials processing experiment

The Office of Commercial Programs (OCP), working in conjunction with NASA engineers at the Goddard Space Flight Center, is supporting research efforts in robot technology and microelectronics materials processing that will provide many spinoffs for science and industry. The Telerobotic Materials Processing Experiment (TRMPX) is a Shuttle-launched materials processing test payload using a Get Away Special can. The objectives of the project are to define, develop, and demonstrate an automated materials processing capability under realistic flight conditions. TRMPX will provide the capability to test the production processes that are dependent on microgravity. The processes proposed for testing include the annealing of amorphous silicon to increase grain size for more efficient solar cells, thin film deposition to demonstrate the potential of fabricating solar cells in orbit, and the annealing of radiation damaged solar cells

Research and development activities at the Goddard Space Flight Center for the flight telerobotic servicer project

The Flight Telerobotic Servicer (FTS) is being developed by the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) for performing a variety of assembly, servicing, inspection and maintenance tasks on the Space Station. The Project Office at GSFC has tasked the Engineering Directorate to assemble a robotics research and development program which will support the FTS project. The activities center around support for the Development Test Flight (DTF) on the Space Shuttle and investigations of operational problems associated with the FTS on Space Station Freedom. For the DTF, areas such as control algorithms, safety systems, and end-effectors will be developed. For FTS operations, the emphasis will be to develop a dual-arm bi-lateral force-reflecting teleoperator and use it as an FTS Operational Simulator (FTSOS). The simulator will be used to investigate operational techniques, camera configurations, operator interfacing, orbital replacement unit (ORU) designs, end-effector designs, and training techniques. After a series of test activities, reports will be generated for input to the DTF and FTS designs

Heat pipe flight experiments

OAO 3 heat pipe flight experiments to check out weightlessness behavior are reported. Tested were a hollow channel screen system with helical grooves, a heat pipe with a wicking system of horizontal grooves, and a spiral artery pipe with multichannel fluid return to the evaporator. Flight experiment data proved that all heat pipe geometries containing wicking systems provided uninterrupted fluid return to the condensators during weightlessness and sufficient cooling for isothermalizing optical instruments onboard OAO

Results of thermal environment measurements on the thermal cannister experiment and get away special enclosure

Because the OSS-1 pallet contained a variety of instruments with irregular surface geometry and properties which limited predictability, the total absorbed flux on thermal canister radiators was measured to determine heat rejection capability. The instrumentation and sensor cup design and locations for the thermal canister experiment are illustrated. Graphs show flux sensor history in hot and coal orbits. Kapton erosion is also considered. Results show that the flux levels measured in all STS attitudes are higher than predictions. In cold and moderate attitudes, flight results are a factor of two to three higher than predicts. In hot attitude, much better agreement occurred. It is concluded that in cold or moderate attitudes other sources may be contributing to added inputs (albedo, Earth shine, shuttle background). In hot attitude, smaller differences could be attributed to coatings assumptions or calculation uncertainty