A TECNOLOGIA COMO DISPOSITIVO DO ATENDIMENTO HUMANIZADO NA ATENÇÃO BÁSICA À SAÚDE

Over the years, it has been observed that technology has been advancing more and more and has contributed significantly to people's lives, as well as to important areas such as health, because, based on these tools, it becomes possible to develop care faster and more humanized to patients who seek primary health care to obtain medical assistance. Thus, the research aims to explain the relevance of technology as a device for humanized care in primary health care. The methodology used consisted of the literature review method in order to obtain concise information about the objective of the work, with articles published from 2019 to 2022 available on Scielo, Lilacs and PubMed. Researches that were lower than 2019 were excluded, as well as those whose content was not in Portuguese, which would make the researchers' verification and analysis process difficult. In this way, the results pointed to the benefits caused by technology, enabling better care in terms of medical consultations, exams and guidance to patients, making humanized care in primary health care an essential factor. Concluding on the need to expand technology as a humanized device in all primary health care units, considering that some locations do not have these tools, because, in addition to promoting effectiveness in terms of faster assistance, it enables the minimization queue for appointments and exams.Com o passar dos anos, observa-se que a tecnologia vem avançando cada vez mais e contribuído de forma significativa na vida das pessoas, como também para áreas importantes como a da saúde, pois, a partir dessas ferramentas que torna-se possível desenvolver atendimento mais rápidos e humanizado aos pacientes que buscam atenção básica de saúde para obter assistência médica. Assim, a pesquisa objetiva explicar sobre a relevância da tecnologia como dispositivo do atendimento humanizado na atenção básica à saúde. A metodologia utilizada consistiu no método revisão de literatura com o intuito de obter informações concisas a respeito do objetivo do trabalho, sendo inserido artigos publicados no período de 2019 a 2022 disponíveis na Scielo, Lilacs e PubMed. Sendo excluídas pesquisas que estavam inferior a 2019, bem como aquelas cujo conteúdo não era língua portuguesa, o que dificultaria o processo de verificação e análise dos pesquisadores. Dessa forma, os resultados apontaram sobre os benefícios ocasionados pela tecnologia, possibilitando melhores atendimentos em termos de consultas médicas, exames e orientações aos pacientes, tornando o atendimento humanizado na atenção básica à saúde como um fator imprescindível. Concluindo-se sobre a necessidade de ampliar a tecnologia como dispositivo humanizado em todas as unidades de atenção básica à saúde, tendo em vista que algumas localidades não dispõem dessas ferramentas, pois, além de promover eficácia em termos de assistência mais rápida, possibilita a minimização da fila de espera por atendimentos e exames

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field