Etiology of and Predictive Factors for Chronic Intestinal Failure Requiring Long Term Parenteral Support in the Last Two Decades: A Retrospective Study

Background and aims: Chronic intestinal failure (CIF) has been long-recognized, however the underlying etiology and risk factors have not been historically well-studied. We aim to study the underlying etiologies of CIF and predictive factors for long-term parenteral support (PS). Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed CIF who received PS to maintain nutrition at the Cleveland Clinic between 2000 and 2017. Long-term PS was defined as a duration of more than 3 months. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of the need for long-term PS. Results: We identified 350 patients with CIF, 150 (43%) and 200 (57%) were diagnosed before and after 2010, respectively. The most common etiology was Crohn\u27s disease (CD) in both cohorts (34.7% versus 30.5%, p = 0.41). Graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) was a less frequent cause of CIF after 2010 (12.7% versus 2.5%, p = 0.0002). The type of PS was mostly total parenteral nutrition before and after 2010, 95% and 96%, respectively (p = 0.55). On univariable analysis, absence of ileocecal valve (p \u3c 0.0001), ischemic bowel disease (p = 0.009), and whole colon resection (p = 0.033) were associated with the need for long-term PS. On multivariable analysis, absence of ileocecal valve (OR 2.19, p = 0.011) and ischemic bowel disease (OR 3.04, p = 0.003) remained statistically significant predictors of long-term PS. Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with CIF, CD remains the leading etiology over the last 20 years, whereas GVHD is less common after 2010. The absence of ileocecal valve and ischemic bowel disease were reliable predictive factors for requiring long-term PS

Effects of Probiotics on Intestinal Failure–Associated Liver Disease in Adult Patients Receiving Prolonged Parenteral Support: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Background: It has been hypothesized that dysbiosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of intestinal failure–associated liver disease (IFALD). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of probiotics on IFALD in patients receiving parenteral support, namely home parenteral nutrition (HPN) and home intravenous fluids (HIVFs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with intestinal failure who received HPN or HIVF for \u3e2 weeks at our tertiary center between January 2005 and August 2016. We excluded patients \u3c18 years of age, patients with other causes of liver disease, patients who used probiotics for \u3c30 days, patients with \u3c6 months\u27 follow-up, and those who had long-term antibiotic use (\u3e30 days). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used in this study. Results: A total of 282 patients who received parenteral support were included. Eighty-five percent of our sample received PN. A total of 78 (27.7%) patients used probiotics. The prevalence of IFALD in patients who used probiotics was 35.9% vs 54.4% in patients who did not use probiotics, P =.005. In multivariable analysis, only small-bowel length of 10-90 cm and HPN use showed a significant impact on IFALD, odds ratio (OR) = 4.394 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.635-11.814; P =.003) and OR = 4.502 (95% CI 1.412-14.351; P =.011), respectively. Conclusion: Our study revealed that the prevalence of IFALD was comparable among the probiotic users and nonusers. Only small bowel length of 1090 cm and HPN use showed a significant impact on IFALD

Effects of Probiotics on Intestinal Failure–Associated Liver Disease in Adult Patients Receiving Prolonged Parenteral Support: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Background: It has been hypothesized that dysbiosis plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of intestinal failure–associated liver disease (IFALD). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of probiotics on IFALD in patients receiving parenteral support, namely home parenteral nutrition (HPN) and home intravenous fluids (HIVFs). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients with intestinal failure who received HPN or HIVF for \u3e2 weeks at our tertiary center between January 2005 and August 2016. We excluded patients \u3c18 years of age, patients with other causes of liver disease, patients who used probiotics for \u3c30 days, patients with \u3c6 months\u27 follow-up, and those who had long-term antibiotic use (\u3e30 days). Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used in this study. Results: A total of 282 patients who received parenteral support were included. Eighty-five percent of our sample received PN. A total of 78 (27.7%) patients used probiotics. The prevalence of IFALD in patients who used probiotics was 35.9% vs 54.4% in patients who did not use probiotics, P =.005. In multivariable analysis, only small-bowel length of 10-90 cm and HPN use showed a significant impact on IFALD, odds ratio (OR) = 4.394 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.635-11.814; P =.003) and OR = 4.502 (95% CI 1.412-14.351; P =.011), respectively. Conclusion: Our study revealed that the prevalence of IFALD was comparable among the probiotic users and nonusers. Only small bowel length of 1090 cm and HPN use showed a significant impact on IFALD