Relative risks of community-based HTC versus facility-based HTC among key populations.

<p>The numerator for all RRs was the risk of an outcome in community-based testing, while the denominator was the risk of an outcome in facility-based testing.</p

Uptake of school-based HTC.

<p>Uptake of school-based HTC.</p

Uptake of self-testing.

<p>Uptake of self-testing.</p

Pooled relative risks of community- versus facility-based HTC sensitivity analyses.

<p>N/A, not applicable.</p

First time testers in community-based testing approaches for key populations.

<p>First time testers in community-based testing approaches for key populations.</p

Uptake of workplace HTC.

<p>Asterisk: data reported were from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, Congo, and Nigeria.</p

Uptake of door-to-door HTC.

<p>Asterisk: data reported were exclusively from children aged 18 mo.–13 y.</p

Number needed to screen to identify a person with HIV in studies offering community- and facility-based HTC.

<p>The Henry-Reid et al. <a href="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001496#pmed.1001496-HenryReid1" target="_blank">[87]</a> study was excluded since it did not find any people with HIV among the 20 school participants screened.</p

Flow of information through different phases of the review.

<p>Flow of information through different phases of the review.</p

Pooled relative risks of community-based HTC versus facility-based HTC.

<p>The numerator for all RRs was the risk of an outcome in community-based testing, while the denominator was the risk of an outcome in facility-based testing.</p