Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses

Objective: An animal model has been developed to compare the effects of suture technique on the luminal dimensions and compliance of end-to-side vascular anastomoses. Methods: Carotid and internal mammalian arteries (IMAs) were exposed in three pigs (90 kg). IMAs were sectioned distally to perform end-to-side anastomoses on carotid arteries. One anastomosis was performed with 7/0 polypropylene running suture. The other was performed with the automated suture delivery device (Perclose/Abbott Labs Inc.) that makes a 7/0 polypropylene interrupted suture. Four piezoelectric crystals were sutured on toe, heel and both lateral sides of each anastomosis to measure anastomotic axes. Anastomotic cross-sectional area (CSAA) was calculated with: CSAA = π × mM/4 where m and M are the minor and major axes of the elliptical anastomosis. Cross-sectional anastomotic compliance (CSAC) was calculated as CSAC = δCSAA/δP where δP is the mean pulse pressure and δCSAA is the mean CSAA during cardiac cycle. Results: We collected a total of 1 200 000 pressure-length data per animal. For running suture we had a mean systolic CSAA of 26.94±0.4 mm2 and a mean CSAA in diastole of 26.30±0.5 mm2 (mean δCSAA was 0.64 mm2). CSAC for running suture was 4.5×10−6m2/kPa. For interrupted suture we had a mean CSAA in systole of 21.98±0.2 mm2 and a mean CSAA in diastole of 17.38±0.3 mm2 (mean δCSAA was 4.6±0.1 mm2). CSAC for interrupted suture was 11×10−6 m2/kPa. Conclusions: This model, even with some limitations, can be a reliable source of information improving the outcome of vascular anastomoses. The study demonstrates that suture technique has a substantial effect on cross-sectional anastomotic compliance of end-to-side anastomoses. Interrupted suture may maximise the anastomotic lumen and provides a considerably higher CSAC than continuous suture, that reduces flow turbulence, shear stress and intimal hyperplasia. The Heartflo™ anastomosis device is a reliable instrument that facilitates performance of interrupted suture anastomose

Systolic axial artery length reduction: an overlooked phenomenon in vivo.

To demonstrate axial artery motion during the cardiac cycle, the common carotid arteries (CCA) of 10 pigs were exposed and equipped with piezoelectric crystals sutured onto the artery as axial position detectors. An echo-tracking system was used to simultaneously measure the CCA diameter. For each animal, data for pressure, length, and diameter were collected at a frequency of 457 Hz. At a mean pulse pressure of 33 +/- 8 mmHg, the mean systolodiastolic length difference was 0.3 +/- 0.01 mm for a mean arterial segment of 11.35 +/- 1.25 mm. Systolic and diastolic diameters were 4.1 +/- 0.3 and 3.9 +/- 0.2 mm, respectively. The examined CCA segment displayed a mean axial systolic shortening of 2.7%. This study clearly demonstrates, for the first time, that the length of a segment of the CCA changes during the cardiac cycle and that this movement is inversely correlated with pulse pressure. It is also apparent that the segmental axial strain is significantly smaller than the diameter variation during the cardiac cycle and that the impact of the axial strain for compliance computation should be further evaluated

Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses.

OBJECTIVE: An animal model has been developed to compare the effects of suture technique on the luminal dimensions and compliance of end-to-side vascular anastomoses. METHODS: Carotid and internal mammalian arteries (IMAs) were exposed in three pigs (90 kg). IMAs were sectioned distally to perform end-to-side anastomoses on carotid arteries. One anastomosis was performed with 7/0 polypropylene running suture. The other was performed with the automated suture delivery device (Perclose/Abbott Labs Inc.) that makes a 7/0 polypropylene interrupted suture. Four piezoelectric crystals were sutured on toe, heel and both lateral sides of each anastomosis to measure anastomotic axes. Anastomotic cross-sectional area (CSAA) was calculated with: CSAA = pi x mM/4 where m and M are the minor and major axes of the elliptical anastomosis. Cross-sectional anastomotic compliance (CSAC) was calculated as CSAC=Delta CSAA/Delta P where Delta P is the mean pulse pressure and Delta CSAA is the mean CSAA during cardiac cycle. RESULTS: We collected a total of 1200000 pressure-length data per animal. For running suture we had a mean systolic CSAA of 26.94+/-0.4 mm(2) and a mean CSAA in diastole of 26.30+/-0.5 mm(2) (mean Delta CSAA was 0.64 mm(2)). CSAC for running suture was 4.5 x 10(-6)m(2)/kPa. For interrupted suture we had a mean CSAA in systole of 21.98+/-0.2 mm(2) and a mean CSAA in diastole of 17.38+/-0.3 mm(2) (mean Delta CSAA was 4.6+/-0.1 mm(2)). CSAC for interrupted suture was 11 x 10(-6) m(2)/kPa. CONCLUSIONS: This model, even with some limitations, can be a reliable source of information improving the outcome of vascular anastomoses. The study demonstrates that suture technique has a substantial effect on cross-sectional anastomotic compliance of end-to-side anastomoses. Interrupted suture may maximise the anastomotic lumen and provides a considerably higher CSAC than continuous suture, that reduces flow turbulence, shear stress and intimal hyperplasia. The Heartflo anastomosis device is a reliable instrument that facilitates performance of interrupted suture anastomoses