National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Version 2—Advances in psoriatic disease management, COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 treatments

This article is made available for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.Objective To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted. Results The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus. Limitations The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity. Conclusions These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force Guidance for Management of Psoriatic Disease During the Pandemic: Version 1

Objective To provide guidance about management of psoriatic disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Study design A task force (TF) of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was convened. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by questions received by the NPF. A Delphi process was conducted. Results The TF approved 22 guidance statements. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements. All guidance statements proposed were recommended, 9 with high consensus and 13 with moderate consensus. Limitations The evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality. Conclusion These statements provide guidance for the management of patients with psoriatic disease on topics ranging from how the disease and its treatments impact COVID-19 risk and outcome, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is intended to be a living document that will be updated by the TF as data emerge

Cardiovascular Risk of Short-term Low Dose Glucocorticoid Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Cardiovascular Risk of Short-term Low Dose Glucocorticoid Use in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Anthony Ocon, M.D., PHD, Rheumatologist, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Rochester Regional Health. Objectives and Goals: Recognize the cardiovascular event risk associated with rheumatoid arthritis, as well as with glucocorticoid use Classify the risk for cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis patients who use glucocorticoids in a dose and duration-dependent manne

Immunology of Macrophage Activation Syndrome

Objectives Define Hemophagocytic LymphoHistiocytosis (HLH) and Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) Describe genetic and immunological pathways involved in pathogenesis of MAS Explore immunological pathways as targets of treatmen

Understanding and Therapeutically Targeting the Scleroderma Myofibroblast

Purpose of Review Myofibroblasts represent matrix-producing effector cells which both produce and maintain the pro-fibrotic microenvironment in scleroderma and other fibrotic diseases. This review first explores the origins, function, regulators, interactions, and death of myofibroblasts in fibrotic tissue and then utilizes this information to guide understanding of current and future treatments which may target these cells. Recent Findings. Beyond existing immunomodulatory therapy for SSc, there are an increasing number of anti-fibrotic therapies which are either under clinical study or development which may be able to effectively target myofibroblasts. Summary The role of myofibroblast modulation in treatment of scleroderma is a promising field with data supporting multiple new agents which may modulate myofibroblasts as anti-fibrotic therapy

Real-World Experience of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) in Rheumatologic Patients on Rituximab

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Although vaccination is the primary strategy against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), rheumatologic patients on B-cell depleting agent rituximab may have a suboptimal response. Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) could be administered under Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization as pre-exposure prophylaxis. METHODS: A cohort study of rheumatologic patients on rituximab therapy who received Evusheld was followed longitudinally. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received Evusheld, with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, ANCA vasculitis, immune-mediated myositis, Sjögren disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Average time to follow-up was 100 ± 33 days. One patient experienced symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by home antigen test twice. A total of 97.8% of patients during follow-up did not contract acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. At the same time, 32,074 new local cases were reported with a local cumulative SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate of 4.32%. Adverse events included myalgia, flu-like symptoms, fevers, injection site pain, or headache. No serious adverse events, anaphylaxis, or cardiac events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Evusheld demonstrated effectiveness in preventing symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in a real-world cohort of rheumatologic patients on rituximab therapy. Administration of Evusheld may be considered as part of a multilayered approach to risk mitigation in this high-risk population as pre-exposure prophylaxis

Chronic Anti-HMG-CoA Reductase Positive Necrotizing Myositis With Remote Exposure to Statins

The use of statins may be associated with muscle-related side effects ranging from myalgia to rhabdomyolysis. A rare adverse effect is statin-induced anti-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) necrotizing myositis, which may develop after exposure to statins due to autoantibodies against HMG-Co-A reductase. We present the case of a 76-year-old male who developed progressive muscle weakness three years after exposure to statins. He had significantly elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels, despite the discontinuation of statins three years prior. He complained of generalized muscle weakness, and examination revealed reduced strength, especially in the proximal musculature. MRI revealed inflammatory myositis of the medial and posterior compartments of bilateral thighs. Autoimmune workup was positive for anti-HMG-CoA reductase antibodies. Muscle biopsy showed endomysial inflammation with fibrosis and fat replacement, suggesting chronic but active myositis. A diagnosis of chronic anti-HMGCR necrotizing myositis was made. The patient was started on oral prednisone and methotrexate with improvement in symptoms and CK levels. This case highlights a chronic form of a rare cause of myositis that may be a challenge to diagnose given the remote exposure to statins

Real-World Effectiveness of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) in Patients With Hematological Malignancies

Background: Immunocompromised individuals with hematological malignancy have increased risk for poor outcomes and death from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This special population may mount a suboptimal response to vaccination. We assessed the effectiveness of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld), a monoclonal antibody combination against SARS-CoV-2, in conjunction with standard preventative measures, at preventing symptomatic incident infection. Methods: Patients aged 18 years and older with hematological malignancy consented to receive Evusheld. Patients were followed longitudinally for development of symptomatic incident SARS-CoV-2 infections. Adverse events were monitored. Results: Two hundred and three patients (94 female) with hematological malignancies and mean age 72 ± 10 years were included. Of the patients, 99.5% had received at least one mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Average time of follow-up was 151 ± 50 days. Nineteen patients (9.3%) developed incident symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, with only one (0.5%) requiring hospitalization. During the same follow-up period, local incident rate of infection was 84,123 cases (11.3% of population). Of those, 3,386 cases (4%) of SARS-CoV-2 required hospital admission. The incidence rate ratio was 0.79. No serious adverse events occurred following administration of Evusheld. Conclusion: Patients with hematological malignancy who received Evusheld infrequently developed symptomatic infections or require hospitalization. The high-risk cohort incidence was at least as comparable to the average risk general population. Evusheld appears effective and is well tolerated, and may be administered in conjunction with vaccination and standard prevention measures, at decreasing incident SARS-Co-V2 cases in this high-risk population