The Impact of Diet-Induced Weight Loss on Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer: An Exploratory Study (INTERCEPT)

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the potential effects of diet-induced weight loss on molecular biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk in serum and colorectal tissue. Methods: This single-arm exploratory study included 20 adults with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 completing an 8-week, complete, low-energy liquid diet. Pre- and postintervention anthropometric measurements, fasting blood draws, and endoscopic examinations to procure colorectal biopsies were performed. Fasting insulin, glucose, insulinlike growth factor 1 (IGF-1), C-reactive protein (CRP), and blood lipids were measured in serum, and tissue markers of apoptosis (M30), colonocyte proliferation (Ki-67), and insulin signaling (phospho-mTOR) were assessed using immunohistochemical staining. Results: Participants achieved substantial weight loss (mean = 13.56%). Mean concentrations of insulin, glucose, and cholesterol were significantly reduced (P < 0.05), but IGF-1 and CRP were not. Colorectal tissue expression of Ki-67 was significantly reduced (preintervention mean score = 7, postintervention mean score = 3.9, mean % change −43.8; P = 0.027). There were no significant changes in M30 or phospho-mTOR. Conclusions: Weight loss in individuals with obesity was associated with improvements in insulin sensitivity and blood lipid profiles and a significant reduction in tissue Ki-67 expression. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate potential cancer-relevant changes in colorectal tissue following weight loss achieved through diet

The development and testing of a brief ('gist-based') supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet.

To design and user-test a 'gist-based' colorectal cancer screening information leaflet, which promotes comprehension of the screening offer

How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study

The English NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme biennially invites individuals aged 60-74 to participate in screening. The booklet, 'Bowel Cancer Screening: The Facts' accompanies this invitation. Its primary aim is to inform potential participants about the aims, advantages and disadvantages of colorectal cancer screening

Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England

BACKGROUND: Introduction of organised, population-based, colorectal cancer screening in the United Kingdom using the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has the potential to reduce overall colorectal cancer mortality. However, socio-economic variation in screening participation could exacerbate existing inequalities in mortality.METHODS: This study examined FOBT uptake rates in London, England in relation to area-level socio-economic deprivation over the first 30 months of the programme during which 401 197 individuals were sent an FOBT kit. Uptake was defined as return of a completed test kit within 3 months. Area-level deprivation in each postcode sector was indexed with the Townsend Material Deprivation Index. Analyses controlled for area-level household mobility, ethnic diversity and poor health, each of which was associated with lower return rates.RESULTS: The results showed a strong socio-economic gradient in FOBT uptake, which declined from 49% in the least deprived quintile of postcodes to 38% in the middle quintile and 32% in the most deprived quintile. Variation in socio-economic deprivation between sectors accounted for 62% of the variance in return rates, with little attenuation as a result of controlling for ethnic diversity, household mobility or health status.CONCLUSION: These results highlight the need to understand the causes of socio-economic gradients in screening participation and address barriers that could otherwise increase disparities in colorectal cancer survival

The effect of a supplementary ('Gist-based') information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial.

Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a 'Gist-based' leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants' numerical ability. Adults aged 45-59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive standard information ('The Facts', n = 2,216) versus standard information plus 'The Gist' leaflet (Gist + Facts, n = 2,236). Questionnaires were returned by 964/4,452 individuals (22 %). 82 % of respondents reported having read the information, but those with poor numeracy were less likely (74 vs. 88 %, p < .001). The 'Gist + Facts' group were more likely to reach the criterion for adequate knowledge (95 vs. 91 %; p < .01), but this was not moderated by numeracy. Most respondents (98 %) intended to participate in screening, with no group differences and no interaction with numeracy. The improved levels of knowledge and self-reported reading suggest 'The Gist' leaflet may increase engagement with colorectal cancer screening, but ceiling effects reduced the likelihood that screening intentions would be affected

Narrowing the Gap Between Providers’ Knowledge and Practice to Improve Osteoporosis Care

Today’s healthcare screening recommendations are often provided by organizations and providers who care for specific populations and diseases. Despite the current recommendations from National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF), the project site had a gap in the consistent use of their current evidence-based guidelines for osteoporosis screenings. The purpose of this quantitative quasi-experimental project was to determine if the implementation of the screening criteria contained in the NOF Clinicians Guide to the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis would impact the number of dual-energy x-rays absorptiometry (DXA) ordered and performed among adult patients with osteoporosis risk factors. The project took place in a primary care clinic on the east coast over four weeks. Kurt Lewin’s change model was used as the conceptual foundation for the project. The total sample size was 70, n=40 in the comparative group (three months prior) and n= 30in the implementation group. Two-sample proportion tests were performed to determine if a statistical difference existed between the comparative and implementation groups. Results indicated there was both a statistical and clinically significant improvement of 20 percentage points in the rate of DXA scans ordered and performed χ2(1) = 4.496, p = .03. The findings of this project demonstrated a clinically significant increase in patients evaluated and screened by guidelines for osteoporosis. Recommendations include continuation of implementation of the NOF Clinician Guidelines and possible repetition of the project at another clinical site over an extended monitoring period as well as with a larger sample size to increase DXA screenings