Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments

This is the final version. Available on open access from the European Geosciences Union via the DOI in this recordCode availability: Processing code for the FAAM core measurements suite is available from GitHub (Sproson et al., 2020).Data availability Airborne data for the CLARIFY campaign are available from the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements et al., 2017) and for the ORACLES campaign from NASA Earth Science Project Office (ORACLES Science Team, 2020). The LASIC ground-based data sets are publicly available from the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility (Zuidema et al., 2017) with specialist data sets available for the following: SP2 – https://iop.archive.arm.gov/arm-iop/2016/ (last access: 25 October 2022, Sedlacek, 2017), CO – https://doi.org/10.5439/1046183 (Springston, 2018b), CAPS PMSSA – https://adc.arm.gov/discovery/#/results/s::caps-ssa (Onasch et al., 2015), ACSM – https://doi.org/10.5439/1763029 (Zawadowicz and Howie, 2021).Data are presented from intercomparisons between two research aircraft, the FAAM BAe-146 and the NASA Lockheed P3, and between the BAe-146 and the surface-based DOE (Department of Energy) ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) Mobile Facility at Ascension Island (8∘ S, 14.5∘ W; a remote island in the mid-Atlantic). These took place from 17 August to 5 September 2017, during the African biomass burning (BB) season. The primary motivation was to give confidence in the use of data from multiple platforms with which to evaluate numerical climate models. The three platforms were involved in the CLouds–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing for Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017), ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES), and Layered Atlantic Smoke and Interactions with Clouds (LASIC) field experiments. Comparisons from flight segments on 6 d where the BAe-146 flew alongside the ARM facility on Ascension Island are presented, along with comparisons from the wing-tip-to-wing-tip flight of the P3 and BAe-146 on 18 August 2017. The intercomparison flight sampled a relatively clean atmosphere overlying a moderately polluted boundary layer, while the six fly-bys of the ARM site sampled both clean and polluted conditions 2–4 km upwind. We compare and validate characterisations of aerosol physical, chemical and optical properties as well as atmospheric radiation and cloud microphysics between platforms. We assess the performance of measurement instrumentation in the field, under conditions where sampling conditions are not as tightly controlled as in laboratory measurements where calibrations are performed. Solar radiation measurements compared well enough to permit radiative closure studies. Optical absorption coefficient measurements from all three platforms were within uncertainty limits, although absolute magnitudes were too low (<10 Mm−1) to fully support a comparison of the absorption Ångström exponents. Aerosol optical absorption measurements from airborne platforms were more comparable than aircraft-to-ground observations. Scattering coefficient observations compared adequately between airborne platforms, but agreement with ground-based measurements was worse, potentially caused by small differences in sampling conditions or actual aerosol population differences over land. Chemical composition measurements followed a similar pattern, with better comparisons between the airborne platforms. Thermodynamics, aerosol and cloud microphysical properties generally agreed given uncertainties.Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)NERC/Met Office Industrial Case studentshipResearch Council of NorwayUS Department of Energy, Office of ScienceNASAUS Department of Energy Atmospheric Systems Research (ASR) programm

Physics division progress report for the quarter /

Operated by Carbide and Carbon Chemicals CompanyMode of access: Internet.Description based on ORNL 325

Physics division quarterly progress report /

Operated by Carbide and Carbon Chemicals CompanyMode of access: Internet.Description based on ORNL 1164

Application of GO anchored mediator in a polymer electrolyte membrane for high-rate solid-state supercapacitors

Here, we synthesized a novel polymer electrolyte membrane by combining poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) and lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) with graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets and a lithium salt of tungstosilicic acid (Li4SiW12O40, hereafter, referred to SiWLi). The impact of the addition of GO/SiWLi on the microstructure and morphology of the membrane were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). We found that adding the GO/SiWLi to the PVDF/LiTFSI polymer electrolyte membrane significantly reduced the pore size. Furthermore, the addition of the GO/SiWLi resulted in not only an increase of the ionic conductivity from 0.87 $\times$ 10–2 to 3.12 $\times$ 10–2Scm–1 but also an increase in the lithium-ion transference number from 0.52 to 0.87. The polymer electrolyte membranes with and without GO/SiWLi were utilized to fabricate solid-state supercapacitors. The supercapacitors fabricated with the membrane containing GO/SiWLi displayed 37.2% lower equivalent series resistance and 88.2% greater specific capacitance than those fabricated using the membrane without GO/SiWLi at 200mVs–1