Alley cropping with Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) de Wit and Acioa barteri (Hook F.) Engl.

The effect of alley cropping with seven combinations of Acioa and Leucaena hedgerows and a control (no hedgerow) treatment on sequentially cropped maize and cowpea was studied in 1985 and 1986. The trial was carried out on an Alfisol in the humid zone of southwestern Nigeria. Hedgerows were established in 1983, using 4 m interhedgerow spacing and pruned to 25 cm height during cropping. Highest dry matter, wood, and nutrient yields of prunings of Acioa and Leucaena hedgerows were obtained with sole cropping. Growing Leucaena and Acioa in the same hedgerow suppressed dry matter production and nutrient yield of Acioa more than of Leucaena owing to the latter's faster growth. Total pruning dry matter yield was reduced as the proportion of Acioa increased in the combination. Leucaena prunings had higher nutrient yield than Acioa. Under 22-month old uncut hedgerows, weed biomass declined in the presence of Leucaena, either alone or in combination with Acioa. Weed weight under sole Leucaena hedgerows was about a third of that in the control plot. There was no significant effect of alley cropping on weed biomass, although alley cropping with Acioa and Leucaena hedgerows resulted in the dominance of broad leaf weeds while the control had a mixture of broadleaves and grasses. Alley cropping with various combinations of Acioa and Leucaena hedgerows increased maize and cowpea yields compared to control. Nitrogen application in both years increased maize grain yield. Mean yield increase due to N application in both years was highest in the control (47.2%) followed by the sole Acioa hedgerow (25.2%) and less in hedgerows with Leucaena. The results of observations over two years do not show any advantage for the tested Leucaena and Acioa combinations on maize and cowpea crops as compared to the sale hedgerows

Response of some tropical nitrogenfixing woody legumes to drought and inoculation with mycorrhiza

This paper reports on a study of the influence ofdrought and inoculation with mycorrhiza on dry-matter production, nutrient uptake and water relations of Acacia auriculiformis, Albizia lebheck. Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala in a sterile soil. Inoculation with L. leucocephala roots containing vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi (Glomus and Acaulospora spp.) resulted in infection of 25-68% in regularly watered plants. Drought stress reduced infection by 8-49%. In general, VAM plants survived better, and had more dry matter and nutrients and a larger leaf area, than uninoculated plants. For A. auriculiformis. however, the VAM inoculant reduced leaf area, plant dry weight and nitrogen content, although it increased phosphorus uptake. Inoculation ofA . auriculiformis with the ectomycorrhizal fungus Boletus suillus resulted in higher nutrient uptake than in non-mycorrhizal and VAM plants. Drought stress tended to reduce plant growth as well as phosphorus and nitrogen uptake. With the exception of A. auriculiformis, nutrient content in drought-stressed VAM plants was either greater than or comparable with the nutrient content of unstressed non-mycorrhizal plants

Effects of ectomycorrhizal and vesculararbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on drought tolerance of four leguminous woody seedlings

Seedlings of Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. ex. Benth., Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth., Gliricidia sepium (Jac.) Walp and Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. were inoculated with an ectomycorrhizal (Boletus suillus (L. ex. Fr.) or indigenous vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi in a low P soil. The plants were subjected to unstressed (well-watered) and drought-stressed (water-stressed) conditions. In Gliricidia and Leucaena , both mycorrhizal inoculations stimulated greater plant growth, P and N uptake compared to their non-mycorrhizal (NM) plants under both watering regimes. However, in Acacia and Albizia , these parameters were only stimulated by either ectomycorrhiza (Acacia) or VA mycorrhiza (Albizia). Growth reduction occurred as a result of inoculation with the other type of mycorrhiza. This was attributed to competition for carbon between Acacia and VA mycorrhizas and parasitic association between Albizia and ectomycorrhiza. Drought-stressed mycorrhizal and NM Leucaena , and drought-stressed mycorrhizal Acacia tolerated lower xylem pressure potentials and larger water losses than the drought-stressed mycorrhizal and NM Albizia and Gliricidia . These latter plants avoided drought by maintaining higher xylem pressure potentials and leaf relative water content (RWC). All the four leguminous plants were mycorrhizal dependent. The higher the mycorrhizal dependency (MD), the lower the drought tolerance expressed in terms of drought response index (DRI). The DRI may be a useful determinant of MD, as they are inversely related