455 research outputs found

    Direct Electability, Competence and Responsibility as the Basis for the Long-Term Development of Local Self-Government in Russia

    Get PDF
    The issues of legal regulation of local self-government in the Russian Federation have been the subjects of numerous studies and discussions for a long time, while their intensity and relevance not only does not decrease, but also increases from year to year. In many ways, this is due to the fact that over the 30-year period of modern Russian history, the legislation on local self-government and its law enforcement practice is characterized by an extreme degree of dynamism and uncertainty, which certainly affects the quality of organization and functioning of this level of public authority. The meeting of the Council for the Development of Local Self-Government under the President of the Russian Federation, held on April 20, 2023, once again showed the existence of issues and the need for the authorities to find the optimal model of regulatory regulation of municipal government and the extreme imperfection of the provisions of draft law No. 40361-8 β€œOn the general principles of the organization of local self-government in a unified system of public power”, which undoubtedly causes the need for scientific understanding and development of relevant proposals. Based on the historical and legal analysis of the development of the provisions of federal legislation on local self-government, the established constitutional and legal judicial practice, the experience of direct professional activity in local self-government bodies, the Author concludes that the federal legislator over the past 30 years of the existence of local self-government in our state has not only failed to definitively determine the basic legal provisions of the foundations local self-government, constantly β€œranking” them and changing them, but it also significantly modified the originally laid down constitutional and legal essence of local self-government as a form of direct participation of citizens in solving issues of the territory of their residence. In this regard, the Author of the study suggests several β€œfundamental” provisions that will allow us to return to the constitutional and legal format of local self-government, laid down in the early 1990s. It seems that taking into account and consolidating the proposed foundations in the formation of a promising legal regulation of local self-government within the framework of building a unified system of public authority in our state will not only eliminate obvious β€œexcesses” in the current system of legal regulation, but also fully provide a basis for effective interaction of bodies of a unified system of public authority in the interests of the population of the relevant territory

    Some Aspects of the Regulatory Environment of Local Self-Government in Federal Cities

    Get PDF
    The issues of legal regulation of the organization and functioning of all government bodi es have always been the subject of numerous studies, discussions and even disputes. The rapid new reorganization of the legal foundations of the unified system of public power that started in 2020, having passed the federal and regional level of state power, "stumbled" at the level of local self-government. The draft federal law No. 40361-8 "On General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government in the Unified System of Public Power", which was submitted to the State Duma of the Russian Fe deration on 16 December 2021, has so far remained at the level of "proposals and comments for the second reading". This allows us to focus on the analysis of problematic issues of the current situation with the legislative basis of local self-government in Russia in order to avoid and take into account in the future existing errors and shortcomings, as well as to improve the current system of legal regulation of local self-government as soon as possible. The Authors of this study attempt to analyze and draw the attention of other researchers, representatives of federal and regional legislative authorities to the existing obvious problems in the legislative regulation of local self-government in federal cities. Specific examples of the texts of the laws of Moscow, St. Petersburg and Sevastopol, allow us to draw disappointing conclusions about the significant abuse by the legislators of these constituent entities of the Russian Federation of their rights to regulate certain issues of organization and functioning of local self-government in the territory of federal cities. Evidently, the existing conflicts should be eliminated as soon as possible and taken into account by the federal legislator in the formation of future legislative framework for determining the specifics of local self-government in federal cities. The current situation seriously affects the principle of direct and immediate effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as well as the priority of federal legislation over regional legislation on issues of joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and its constituent entities

    ΠšΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ основы Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти Π² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ (Ρ€Π΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ аспСкт)

    Get PDF
    Within the framework of this study, theoretical approaches to understanding public power in the context of various areas of scientific knowledge are analyzed. In the course of this work, attention is drawn to the constitutional approach, according to which the unified system of public power in the Russian Federation includes two independent, but interacting levels: state and municipal. In this regard, it is noted that the federal legislation adopted in the development of constitutional provisions significantly expands this approach and actually establishes a three-level system of public power. As a consequence, the problem of substantiating the existence of a unified system of public power in the subjects of the Russian Federation is being actualized. Using the system-logical method of research, the provisions of Federal Law No. 414-FZ of December 21, 2021 "On the general principles of the organization of public power in the Subjects of the Russian Federation", which normatively establish the category of a unified system of public power in the subject of the Russian Federation, are analyzed in the work. Certain provisions of the said federal law are not fully consistent with each other and with other federal legislation, including with regard to the constitutional and legal understanding of the unified system of public power. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that the territorial principle cannot underlie the allocation of an independent regional level of public power, since the derivation of public power from the understanding of "state" and "statehood", on the basis of equality of the subjects of the Russian Federation as a constitutional principle, makes it impossible to have a different ratio of intra-system connections in the systems of public power in the subjects of the Russian Federation. The formal legal approach made it possible to trace the dynamics of changes in the constitutional (statutory) legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation, depending on the understanding of the place of state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the unified system of public power. Various normative variations of the constitutional (statutory) legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation, aimed at bringing it into line with the same constitutional text, indicates the absence of an unambiguous and uniform understanding of the place of the system of state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the unified system of public power in the country. Thus, it is noted that the development of a uniform approach based on the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which are mandatory for all subjects of legislative activity, to the content of the category "unified system of public power in the Russian Federation" is fully capable of ensuring the goal of its formation stated in Part 3 of Article 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in compliance with all constitutional principles and norms. In this regard, within the framework of the unified system of public power in Russia, we should not talk about independent unified systems of public power in the subjects of the Russian Federation, but should focus on the formation of a unified system of public power throughout the territory of our state.Π₯арактСристика соврСмСнных ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ пониманию Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти Π² нашСй странС с Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ зрСния Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π΅ позволяСт вСсти Ρ€Π΅Ρ‡ΡŒ ΠΎΠ± ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΈΠΈ взглядов, ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ понимания Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ конструкции ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… исслСдований, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ правотворчСства. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° усугубляСтся ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Ρ„Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒ, развивая Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Π΅ основы Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти Π½Π° ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ„Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², сущСствСнным ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠΌ Ρ€Π°ΡΡˆΠΈΡ€ΡΠ΅Ρ‚ конституционно установлСнныС Π³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ†Ρ‹ этой систСмы, Π²ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ учитывая ΡƒΠΆΠ΅ Ρ€Π°Π½Π΅Π΅ высказанныС ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠšΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π‘ΡƒΠ΄Π° Π Π€ ΠΎ конституционно-ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ сущности ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти. Π’ Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ… настоящСго исслСдования прСдпринята ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ‹Ρ‚ΠΊΠ° Π°Ρ€Π³ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΡƒΡΡ‚Π°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΡΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ конституционных ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Β«Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы государствСнной власти» ΠΈ Β«Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти» с ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΈ философских ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΉ Ρ†Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ части, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ способствуСт пониманию систСмы ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти Π² ΡΡƒΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Π΅ Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΡ‚Π°Π²Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ СдинствСнно ΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ систСмы государствСнной власти Π² Российской Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, которая, Π² свою ΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΡŒ, являСтся Ρ‡Π°ΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ создаваСмой Π² России наряду с ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ мСстного самоуправлСния Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти

    Hard-wall Potential Function for Transport Properties of Alkali Metals Vapor

    Full text link
    This study demonstrates that the transport properties of alkali metals are determined principally by the repulsive wall of the pair interaction potential function. The (hard-wall) Lennard-Jones(15-6) effective pair potential function is used to calculate transport collision integrals. Accordingly, reduced collision integrals of K, Rb, and Cs metal vapors are obtained from Chapman-Enskog solution of the Boltzman equation. The law of corresponding states based on the experimental-transport reduced collision integral is used to verify the validity of a LJ(15-6) hybrid potential in describing the transport properties. LJ(8.5-4) potential function and a simple thermodynamic argument with the input PVT data of liquid metals provide the required molecular potential parameters. Values of the predicted viscosity of monatomic alkali metals vapor are in agreement with typical experimental data with the average absolute deviation 2.97% for K in the range 700-1500 K, 1.69% for Rb, and 1.75% for Cs in the range 700-2000 K. In the same way, the values of predicted thermal conductivity are in agreement with experiment within 2.78%, 3.25%, and 3.63% for K, Rb, and Cs, respectively. The LJ(15-6) hybrid potential with a hard-wall repulsion character conclusively predicts best transport properties of the three alkali metals vapor.Comment: 21 pages, 5 figures, 41 reference

    Наукоград ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅: ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ рСгулирования

    Get PDF
    The subject of this study is the current municipal reform in the Russian Federation and an assessment of its impact on the legal status of science cities.The purpose of the article is to determine the theoretical approaches and practice of legislative regulation of the legal status of science towns, prospects for modern and future legal regulation of the peculiarities of local self-government in such a territory as a science city. The main hypothesis is that the blank method of regulating the peculiarities of local selfgovernment in science cities, perceived by the federal legislator, does not achieve its goal, which obviously requires a revision of approaches to legislative regulation of the status of such a special territory as a science city.The authors used both general research methods, including methods of analysis and synthesis, and industry methods, including the formal legal method.The main results. The authors note the inconsistency and inconsistency of the legislative regulation of the legal, organizational, economic and social foundations of science cities and the peculiarities of the implementation of local self-government in them. Foreign experience in the formation of analogues of Russian science cities demonstrates that, firstly, the creation and development of technopolises contributes to the formation of the most optimal forms of interaction between science and production. Secondly, foreign technopolises are usually formed at research centers and universities, without having a strict link to the territorial foundations of the functioning of municipalities.The authors claim that the science cities of the Russian Federation do not have a constitutional and legal status and are neither the subject of study of such a branch of Russian law as constitutional law, nor the subject of regulation of constitutional legislation. At the moment, the legal status of a science city in the Russian Federation has a dual nature: on the one hand, a science city is a municipal entity with the status of an urban district; on the other hand, it is a territory within which there is a scientific and production complex. At the same time, these two sides of the legal status of a science city in the Russian Federation are poorly interconnected at the level of regulatory regulation. It seems that a science city as a territory with a scientific and industrial complex obviously has a different legal nature than a science city – an urban district, as a territory within which the population and (or) local self-government bodies resolve issues of local importance.Conclusions. It is important to determine at the level of federal authorities the need for further consolidation of the status of municipalities or other legal status of the territory of a science city, which includes high-tech enterprises with a significant concentration of human and material scientific and technical resources, the use of which is aimed at the implementation of science and state scientific and technical policy. If the link "science city – municipal entity" is recognized as necessary and fundamental in the future, taking into account the provisions of Articles 12 and 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to establish, firstly, the legal features of the implementation of local self-government in science cities, and secondly, the basic principles of interaction of local self-government of science cities with public authorities as the solution of issues of local importance in the interests of the population living in the territory of the science city, and the forms and order of participation of the organization.ДаСтся Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… аспСктов соврСмСнного ΠΈ Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ рСгулирования особСнностСй осущСствлСния мСстного самоуправлСния Π½Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΄. Π˜ΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ содСрТаниС Ρ„Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ основы ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ функционирования особой ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΏΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ – Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ². Π§Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π° ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ… России Π² Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Ρ€Π΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΡ‹ мСстного самоуправлСния дСлаСтся Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ нСобходимости ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠ°Π·Π° ΠΎΡ‚ Π±Π»Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ способа рСгулирования особСнностСй осущСствлСния мСстного самоуправлСния Π² Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°Ρ… ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°ΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡƒΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ рСгулирования статуса Π½Π°ΡƒΠΊΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°

    Condensation of Silica Nanoparticles on a Phospholipid Membrane

    Full text link
    The structure of the transient layer at the interface between air and the aqueous solution of silica nanoparticles with the size distribution of particles that has been determined from small-angle scattering has been studied by the X-ray reflectometry method. The reconstructed depth profile of the polarizability of the substance indicates the presence of a structure consisting of several layers of nanoparticles with the thickness that is more than twice as large as the thickness of the previously described structure. The adsorption of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine molecules at the hydrosol/air interface is accompanied by the condensation of anion silica nanoparticles at the interface. This phenomenon can be qualitatively explained by the formation of the positive surface potential due to the penetration and accumulation of Na+ cations in the phospholipid membrane.Comment: 7 pages, 5 figure

    Единая систСма ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти: дискуссионныС аспСкты Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π΅Π³Π»Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ

    Get PDF
    The subject of this study is the legal regulation of the unified system of public authority in the Russian Federation. Its purpose is to determine the theoretical approaches and practice of legislative regulation of a unified system of public authority, which is unfolding after the adoption of amendments to the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020. The main hypothesis, which authors propose is that there is a contradiction between the norms of the acts, governing organization and activities of public authorities, and those norms in their relationship with the constitutional norms governing the relevant relations. In the course of the work, the authors used both general research methods, including methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as field-specific ones, including the formal legal method. The authors believe that the difficulties in reflecting public authority in normative regulation lie primarily in the fact that neither in Soviet legal research, nor in the current Russian legal thought, issues of public authority have been considered meaningfully and in detail. Its content and structure do not have a clear, complete doctrinal understanding. Foreign experience, however, shows that such a clear understanding at the theoretical level is absent in foreign jurisdictions either.ДаСтся характСристика тСорСтичСских ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ рСгулирования Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти, Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉΡΡ послС принятия ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠΊ Π² тСкст ΠšΠΎΠ½ΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π Π€ Π² 2020 Π³. По мнСнию Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ², Π² Ρ‚Π΅ΠΊΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π²Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡΡƒΡ‚ΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ‹ отраТСния Ρ†Π΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π° формирования Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ систСмы ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти, Π²Ρ‹Π·Π²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅, Π² Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ числС, спСцификой конституционноправового статуса мСстного самоуправлСния, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ слоТности, связанныС с Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ конструкции ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ власти ΠΈ Π΅Π΅ элСмСнтов. Авторы ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡ‹ΠΌ для законодатСля Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡƒΡ‰Π΅ΡΡ‚Π²Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒ связанноС ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, обСспСчивая Π½Π΅ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡ€Π΅Ρ‡ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡ‹Ρ… Π² Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Основного Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π° государства

    Comparative study of correlation effects in CaVO3 and SrVO3

    Full text link
    We present parameter-free LDA+DMFT (local density approximation + dynamical mean field theory) results for the many-body spectra of cubic SrVO3 and orthorhombic CaVO3. Both systems are found to be strongly correlated metals, but not on the verge of a metal-insulator transition. In spite of the considerably smaller V-O-V bond angle in CaVO3 the LDA+DMFT spectra of the two systems for energies E<E_F are very similar, their quasiparticle parts being almost identical. The calculated spectrum for E>E_F shows more pronounced, albeit still small, differences. This is in contrast to earlier theoretical and experimental conclusions, but in good agreement with recent bulk-sensitive photoemission and x-ray absorption experiments.Comment: 15 pages, 6 figure
    • …
    corecore