455 research outputs found
Direct Electability, Competence and Responsibility as the Basis for the Long-Term Development of Local Self-Government in Russia
The issues of legal regulation of local self-government in the Russian Federation have been the subjects of numerous studies and discussions for a long time, while their intensity and relevance not only does not decrease, but also increases from year to year. In many ways, this is due to the fact that over the 30-year period of modern Russian history, the legislation on local self-government and its law enforcement practice is characterized by an extreme degree of dynamism and uncertainty, which certainly affects the quality of organization and functioning of this level of public authority. The meeting of the Council for the Development of Local Self-Government under the President of the Russian Federation, held on April 20, 2023, once again showed the existence of issues and the need for the authorities to find the optimal model of regulatory regulation of municipal government and the extreme imperfection of the provisions of draft law No. 40361-8 βOn the general principles of the organization of local self-government in a unified system of public powerβ, which undoubtedly causes the need for scientific understanding and development of relevant proposals. Based on the historical and legal analysis of the development of the provisions of federal legislation on local self-government, the established constitutional and legal judicial practice, the experience of direct professional activity in local self-government bodies, the Author concludes that the federal legislator over the past 30 years of the existence of local self-government in our state has not only failed to definitively determine the basic legal provisions of the foundations local self-government, constantly βrankingβ them and changing them, but it also significantly modified the originally laid down constitutional and legal essence of local self-government as a form of direct participation of citizens in solving issues of the territory of their residence. In this regard, the Author of the study suggests several βfundamentalβ provisions that will allow us to return to the constitutional and legal format of local self-government, laid down in the early 1990s. It seems that taking into account and consolidating the proposed foundations in the formation of a promising legal regulation of local self-government within the framework of building a unified system of public authority in our state will not only eliminate obvious βexcessesβ in the current system of legal regulation, but also fully provide a basis for effective interaction of bodies of a unified system of public authority in the interests of the population of the relevant territory
Some Aspects of the Regulatory Environment of Local Self-Government in Federal Cities
The issues of legal regulation of the organization and functioning of all government bodi es have always been the subject of numerous studies, discussions and even disputes. The rapid new reorganization of the legal foundations of the unified system of public power that started in 2020, having passed the federal and regional level of state power, "stumbled" at the level of local self-government. The draft federal law No. 40361-8 "On General Principles of Organization of Local Self-Government in the Unified System of Public Power", which was submitted to the State Duma of the Russian Fe deration on 16 December 2021, has so far remained at the level of "proposals and comments for the second reading". This allows us to focus on the analysis of problematic issues of the current situation with the legislative basis of local self-government in Russia in order to avoid and take into account in the future existing errors and shortcomings, as well as to improve the current system of legal regulation of local self-government as soon as possible. The Authors of this study attempt to analyze and draw the attention of other researchers, representatives of federal and regional legislative authorities to the existing obvious problems in the legislative regulation of local self-government in federal cities. Specific examples of the texts of the laws of Moscow, St. Petersburg and Sevastopol, allow us to draw disappointing conclusions about the significant abuse by the legislators of these constituent entities of the Russian Federation of their rights to regulate certain issues of organization and functioning of local self-government in the territory of federal cities. Evidently, the existing conflicts should be eliminated as soon as possible and taken into account by the federal legislator in the formation of future legislative framework for determining the specifics of local self-government in federal cities. The current situation seriously affects the principle of direct and immediate effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as well as the priority of federal legislation over regional legislation on issues of joint jurisdiction of the Russian Federation and its constituent entities
ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡ)
Within the framework of this study, theoretical approaches to understanding public power in the context of various areas of scientific knowledge are analyzed. In the course of this work, attention is drawn to the constitutional approach, according to which the unified system of public power in the Russian Federation includes two independent, but interacting levels: state and municipal. In this regard, it is noted that the federal legislation adopted in the development of constitutional provisions significantly expands this approach and actually establishes a three-level system of public power. As a consequence, the problem of substantiating the existence of a unified system of public power in the subjects of the Russian Federation is being actualized. Using the system-logical method of research, the provisions of Federal Law No. 414-FZ of December 21, 2021 "On the general principles of the organization of public power in the Subjects of the Russian Federation", which normatively establish the category of a unified system of public power in the subject of the Russian Federation, are analyzed in the work. Certain provisions of the said federal law are not fully consistent with each other and with other federal legislation, including with regard to the constitutional and legal understanding of the unified system of public power. At the same time, attention is drawn to the fact that the territorial principle cannot underlie the allocation of an independent regional level of public power, since the derivation of public power from the understanding of "state" and "statehood", on the basis of equality of the subjects of the Russian Federation as a constitutional principle, makes it impossible to have a different ratio of intra-system connections in the systems of public power in the subjects of the Russian Federation. The formal legal approach made it possible to trace the dynamics of changes in the constitutional (statutory) legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation, depending on the understanding of the place of state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the unified system of public power. Various normative variations of the constitutional (statutory) legislation of the subjects of the Russian Federation, aimed at bringing it into line with the same constitutional text, indicates the absence of an unambiguous and uniform understanding of the place of the system of state authorities of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the unified system of public power in the country. Thus, it is noted that the development of a uniform approach based on the positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, which are mandatory for all subjects of legislative activity, to the content of the category "unified system of public power in the Russian Federation" is fully capable of ensuring the goal of its formation stated in Part 3 of Article 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in compliance with all constitutional principles and norms. In this regard, within the framework of the unified system of public power in Russia, we should not talk about independent unified systems of public power in the subjects of the Russian Federation, but should focus on the formation of a unified system of public power throughout the territory of our state.Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅ Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π·ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΎΠ± ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠΈ Π²Π·Π³Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΡΡΡΠ³ΡΠ±Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ, Π²ΠΎ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ ΡΡΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Ρ ΡΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π‘ΡΠ΄Π° Π Π€ ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ. Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ° Π°ΡΠ³ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ² Β«Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈΒ» ΠΈ Β«Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈΒ» Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ, Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ, ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ
Hard-wall Potential Function for Transport Properties of Alkali Metals Vapor
This study demonstrates that the transport properties of alkali metals are
determined principally by the repulsive wall of the pair interaction potential
function. The (hard-wall) Lennard-Jones(15-6) effective pair potential function
is used to calculate transport collision integrals. Accordingly, reduced
collision integrals of K, Rb, and Cs metal vapors are obtained from
Chapman-Enskog solution of the Boltzman equation. The law of corresponding
states based on the experimental-transport reduced collision integral is used
to verify the validity of a LJ(15-6) hybrid potential in describing the
transport properties. LJ(8.5-4) potential function and a simple thermodynamic
argument with the input PVT data of liquid metals provide the required
molecular potential parameters. Values of the predicted viscosity of monatomic
alkali metals vapor are in agreement with typical experimental data with the
average absolute deviation 2.97% for K in the range 700-1500 K, 1.69% for Rb,
and 1.75% for Cs in the range 700-2000 K. In the same way, the values of
predicted thermal conductivity are in agreement with experiment within 2.78%,
3.25%, and 3.63% for K, Rb, and Cs, respectively. The LJ(15-6) hybrid potential
with a hard-wall repulsion character conclusively predicts best transport
properties of the three alkali metals vapor.Comment: 21 pages, 5 figures, 41 reference
ΠΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅: ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
The subject of this study is the current municipal reform in the Russian Federation and an assessment of its impact on the legal status of science cities.The purpose of the article is to determine the theoretical approaches and practice of legislative regulation of the legal status of science towns, prospects for modern and future legal regulation of the peculiarities of local self-government in such a territory as a science city. The main hypothesis is that the blank method of regulating the peculiarities of local selfgovernment in science cities, perceived by the federal legislator, does not achieve its goal, which obviously requires a revision of approaches to legislative regulation of the status of such a special territory as a science city.The authors used both general research methods, including methods of analysis and synthesis, and industry methods, including the formal legal method.The main results. The authors note the inconsistency and inconsistency of the legislative regulation of the legal, organizational, economic and social foundations of science cities and the peculiarities of the implementation of local self-government in them. Foreign experience in the formation of analogues of Russian science cities demonstrates that, firstly, the creation and development of technopolises contributes to the formation of the most optimal forms of interaction between science and production. Secondly, foreign technopolises are usually formed at research centers and universities, without having a strict link to the territorial foundations of the functioning of municipalities.The authors claim that the science cities of the Russian Federation do not have a constitutional and legal status and are neither the subject of study of such a branch of Russian law as constitutional law, nor the subject of regulation of constitutional legislation. At the moment, the legal status of a science city in the Russian Federation has a dual nature: on the one hand, a science city is a municipal entity with the status of an urban district; on the other hand, it is a territory within which there is a scientific and production complex. At the same time, these two sides of the legal status of a science city in the Russian Federation are poorly interconnected at the level of regulatory regulation. It seems that a science city as a territory with a scientific and industrial complex obviously has a different legal nature than a science city β an urban district, as a territory within which the population and (or) local self-government bodies resolve issues of local importance.Conclusions. It is important to determine at the level of federal authorities the need for further consolidation of the status of municipalities or other legal status of the territory of a science city, which includes high-tech enterprises with a significant concentration of human and material scientific and technical resources, the use of which is aimed at the implementation of science and state scientific and technical policy. If the link "science city β municipal entity" is recognized as necessary and fundamental in the future, taking into account the provisions of Articles 12 and 132 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, it is necessary to establish, firstly, the legal features of the implementation of local self-government in science cities, and secondly, the basic principles of interaction of local self-government of science cities with public authorities as the solution of issues of local importance in the interests of the population living in the territory of the science city, and the forms and order of participation of the organization.ΠΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΠΏΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ β Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄ΠΎΠ². Π§Π΅ΡΠ΅Π· ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Ρ
Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π² Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΎ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Π·Π° ΠΎΡ Π±Π»Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Ρ
ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π΄Π°
Condensation of Silica Nanoparticles on a Phospholipid Membrane
The structure of the transient layer at the interface between air and the
aqueous solution of silica nanoparticles with the size distribution of
particles that has been determined from small-angle scattering has been studied
by the X-ray reflectometry method. The reconstructed depth profile of the
polarizability of the substance indicates the presence of a structure
consisting of several layers of nanoparticles with the thickness that is more
than twice as large as the thickness of the previously described structure. The
adsorption of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine molecules at the
hydrosol/air interface is accompanied by the condensation of anion silica
nanoparticles at the interface. This phenomenon can be qualitatively explained
by the formation of the positive surface potential due to the penetration and
accumulation of Na+ cations in the phospholipid membrane.Comment: 7 pages, 5 figure
ΠΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ: Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ
The subject of this study is the legal regulation of the unified system of public authority in the Russian Federation. Its purpose is to determine the theoretical approaches and practice of legislative regulation of a unified system of public authority, which is unfolding after the adoption of amendments to the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020. The main hypothesis, which authors propose is that there is a contradiction between the norms of the acts, governing organization and activities of public authorities, and those norms in their relationship with the constitutional norms governing the relevant relations. In the course of the work, the authors used both general research methods, including methods of analysis and synthesis, as well as field-specific ones, including the formal legal method. The authors believe that the difficulties in reflecting public authority in normative regulation lie primarily in the fact that neither in Soviet legal research, nor in the current Russian legal thought, issues of public authority have been considered meaningfully and in detail. Its content and structure do not have a clear, complete doctrinal understanding. Foreign experience, however, shows that such a clear understanding at the theoretical level is absent in foreign jurisdictions either.ΠΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠΊ Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π Π€ Π² 2020 Π³. ΠΠΎ ΠΌΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ, Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Ρ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π°Π³Π°ΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π° Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π°
Comparative study of correlation effects in CaVO3 and SrVO3
We present parameter-free LDA+DMFT (local density approximation + dynamical
mean field theory) results for the many-body spectra of cubic SrVO3 and
orthorhombic CaVO3. Both systems are found to be strongly correlated metals,
but not on the verge of a metal-insulator transition. In spite of the
considerably smaller V-O-V bond angle in CaVO3 the LDA+DMFT spectra of the two
systems for energies E<E_F are very similar, their quasiparticle parts being
almost identical. The calculated spectrum for E>E_F shows more pronounced,
albeit still small, differences. This is in contrast to earlier theoretical and
experimental conclusions, but in good agreement with recent bulk-sensitive
photoemission and x-ray absorption experiments.Comment: 15 pages, 6 figure
- β¦