19 research outputs found

    Keeping the Patient at the Center of Machine Learning in Healthcare

    No full text

    Airway closure in anesthetized infants and children: influence of inspiratory pressures and volumes.

    No full text
    To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links fieldBACKGROUND: Cyclic opening and closing of lung units during tidal breathing may be an important cause of iatrogenic lung injury. We hypothesized that airway closure is uncommon in children with healthy lungs when inspiratory pressures are kept low, but paradoxically may occur when inspiratory pressures are increased. METHODS: Elastic equilibrium volume (EEV) and closing capacity (CC) were measured with a tracer gas (SF(6)) technique in 11 anesthetized, muscle-relaxed, endotracheally intubated and artificially ventilated healthy children, aged 0.6-13 years. Airway closing was studied in a randomized order at two inflation pressures, +20 or +30 cmH(2)O, and CC and CC/EEV were calculated from the plots obtained when the lungs were exsufflated to -20 cmH(2)O. (CC/EEV >1 indicates that airway closure might occur during tidal breathing). Furthermore, a measure of uneven ventilation, multiple breath alveolar mixing efficiency (MBAME), was obtained. RESULTS: Airway closure within the tidal volume (CC/EEV >1) was observed in four and eight children (not significant, NS) after 20 and 30 cmH(2)O inflation, respectively. However, CC(30)/EEV was >CC(20)/EEV in all children (P< or = 0.001). The MBAME was 75+/-7% (normal) and did not correlate with CC/EEV. CONCLUSION: Airway closure within tidal volumes may occur in artificially ventilated healthy children during ventilation with low inspiratory pressure. However, the risk of airway closure and thus opening within the tidal volume increases when the inspiratory pressures are increased

    Intravenous boluses of fentanyl, 1 μg kg-1, and remifentanil, 0.5 μg kg-1, give similar maximum ventilatory depression in awake volunteers.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: /st>The relative respiratory effects of fentanyl and remifentanil, administered as i.v. bolus, have not previously been studied. We determined what remifentanil bolus dose gave the same maximum depression of ventilation as 1 µg kg(-1) of fentanyl. METHODS: /st>Twelve healthy volunteers rebreathed in a system designed to dampen variations in end-tidal carbon dioxide tension so that measurements would be obtained at similar levels of CO(2) stimulation. The minute ventilation was measured before (V(preinj)) and after injection (V(nadir)) of fentanyl, 1 µg kg(-1), and remifentanil, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µg kg(-1). The remifentanil doses were plotted against V(nadir)/V(preinj) in a log-probit diagram to determine what amount gave the same maximum ventilatory depression as the fentanyl dose. RESULTS: /st>V(nadir) was [median (inter-quartile range)] 51 (38-64)% of V(preinj) after fentanyl, and 70 (61-77), 50 (46-56), and 29 (24-38)%, respectively, after remifentanil. The nadir occurred 5.0 (4.4-7.0) min after fentanyl, and 3.8 (2.7-4.6), 2.9 (2.7-3.2), and 3.0 (2.7-3.2) min after remifentanil injection. at ventilation nadir was 6.26 (5.98-6.62) kPa after fentanyl, and 6.18 (6.12-6.50), 6.11 (5.91-6.45), and 6.11 (5.93-6.45) kPa after remifentanil 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µg kg(-1), respectively. A remifentanil dose of 0.47 (0.42-0.62) µg kg(-1) was equidepressant to 1 µg kg(-1) of fentanyl. Fifteen minutes after fentanyl injection, the median minute ventilation was 30-40% less than after injection of remifentanil, 0.25 and 0.5 µg kg(-1) (PFentanyl, 1 µg kg(-1), and remifentanil, 0.5 µg kg(-1), gave similar maximum ventilatory depression. The onset of and recovery from ventilatory depression were faster with remifentanil

    Airway closure in anesthetized infants and children: influence of inspiratory pressures and volumes

    No full text
    Background: Cyclic opening and closing of lung units during tidal breathing may be an important cause of iatrogenic lung injury. We hypothesized that airway closure is uncommon in children with healthy lungs when inspiratory pressures are kept low, but paradoxically may occur when inspiratory pressures are increased. Methods: Elastic equilibrium volume (EEV) and closing capacity (CC) were measured with a tracer gas (SF6) technique in 11 anesthetized, muscle-relaxed, endotracheally intubated and artificially ventilated healthy children, aged 0.6-13years. Airway closing was studied in a randomized order at two inflation pressures, +20 or +30 cmH(2)O, and CC and CC/EEV were calculated from the plots obtained when the lungs were exsufflated to -20 cmH(2)O. (CC/EEV >1 indicates that airway closure might occur during tidal breathing). Furthermore, a measure of uneven ventilation, multiple breath alveolar mixing efficiency (MBAME), was obtained. Results: Airway closure within the tidal volume (CC/EEV>1) was observed in four and eight children (not significant, NS) after 20 and 30cmH(2)O inflation, respectively. However, CC30/EEV was>CC20/EEV in all children (Pless than or equal to0.001). The MBAME was 75+/-7% (normal) and did not correlate with CC/EEV. Conclusion: Airway closure within tidal volumes may occur in artificially ventilated healthy children during ventilation with low inspiratory pressure. However, the risk of airway closure and thus opening within the tidal volume increases when the inspiratory pressures are increased
    corecore