Using Rapid Reviews in Nursing and Midwifery Research: An Example From a Study Commissioned to Inform Policy-Making

Aim: To illustrate the potential use of rapid review approaches in nursing and midwifery research by presenting a worked example from a study conducted to inform policy decision making. Background: Rapid reviews, which can be defined as outputs of a knowledge synthesis approach that involves modifying or omitting elements of a systematic review process due to limited time or resources, are becoming increasingly popular in health research. This paper provides guidance on how a rapid review can be undertaken and discusses the strengths and challenges of the approach. Data source and research design: Data from a rapid review of the literature undertaken in 2015 is used as a worked example to highlight one method of undertaking a rapid review. Implications for nursing: Seeking evidence to inform health policy making or evidence based practice is a process that can be limited by time constraints, making it difficult to conduct comprehensive systematic reviews

The universal, collaborative and dynamic model of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice: A way forward?

Aims and objectives To inform and guide the development of a future model of specialist and advanced nursing and midwifery practice. Background There is a sizable body of empirical literature supporting the unique contributions of specialist and advanced practice roles to health care. However, there is very little international evidence to inform the integration of a future model for advanced or specialist practice in the Irish healthcare system. Design A qualitative study was conducted to initiate this important area of inquiry. Methods Purposive sampling was used to generate a sample of informants (n = 15) for the interviews. Nurses and midwives working in specialist and advanced practice and participants from other areas such as legislative, regulatory, policy, medicine and education were included in the sampling frame. Results Arguments for a new model of specialist and advanced practice were voiced. A number of participants proposed that flexibility within specialist and advanced practitioner career pathways was essential. Otherwise, there existed the possibility of being directed into specialised “silos,” precluding movement to another area of integrated practice. Future specialist and advanced practice education programmes need to include topics such as the development of emotional and political intelligence. Conclusion The contribution of specialist and advanced practice roles to the health service includes providing rapid access to care, seamless patient flow across services, early discharge and lead coordinator of the patient\u27s care trajectory. There was a recommendation of moving towards a universal model to cultivate specialist and advanced nurse and midwife practitioners

sj-pdf-1-jrn-10.1177_17449871211021138 - Supplemental material for Operationalising a modified Delphi study to progress quality care process nursing metrics for acute care

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jrn-10.1177_17449871211021138 for Operationalising a modified Delphi study to progress quality care process nursing metrics for acute care by Laserina O’Connor, Eilish McAuliffe, Mary Casey, Lisa Rogers, Anne Gallen, Leonie Finnegan, Mary Ellen Glasgow, Mark White, Ciara White, Paula Kavanagh, Miriam Bell, Angela Killeen and Marlize Barnard in Journal of Research in Nursing</p