4 research outputs found

    Abstract Number ‐ 220: Internal Carotid Artery Hypoplasia of Unique Anatomical Variance

    No full text
    Introduction Hypoplasia of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is incomplete development of the ICA with the presence of empty carotid canal. Despite anecdotal data reporting less than a 0.01% of developmental anomalies of ICA, the true incidence remains unknown. Many cases are asymptomatic and thus escape diagnostic detection or appropriate intervention. In 1968, Lie and Hage described collateral circulation in ICA developmental anomalies through the Circle of Willis, persistent embryonic vessels, or skull base arteries/anastomosis or rete mirabile. While collateral systems exist, subsequent cerebrovascular insufficiency and vascular malformations may occur as a result. To our knowledge, there is an incomplete body of literature surrounding the implications of ICA hypoplasia of varying anatomy. Methods We present a case report of left ICA hypoplasia and a comprehensive literature review. Results A 70‐year‐old woman with hypertension, nicotine dependence, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presented with COPD exacerbation and disorientation. Computed tomography (CT) head angiography showing left cervical/petrous ICA aplasia with presence of a small carotid canal. The left external carotid and vertebral artery originate at the aortic arch. Majority of the blood supply to the left anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) is suppliedby the right anterior communicating artery (AComA), posterior communicating artery (PComA). There is also a small left supraclinoid and carotid terminus that reconstitute predominantly by right A1 segment and PComA (Figure 1). Conclusions Although ICA hypoplasia may be an incidental finding, accurate and promptrecognition is essential for the consideration of endovascular implications, screening for vascular malformations, understanding cerebral vascular flow, managing cerebrovascular risk, and avoiding misinterpretation of clinical and imaging patterns

    Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality in Lumbar Spine Surgery Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Chronic Steroid Use

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Perioperative steroids have traditionally been administered during lumbar spine surgery in order to decrease local inflammation and prevent scar tissue formation, which can otherwise contribute to significant, long-lasting postoperative pain due to the formation of epidural fibrosis around lumbar nerve roots. However, the use of steroids in lumbar spine patients has raised concerns of postoperative wound complications caused by corticosteroid-induced immunomodulatory effects and changes in collagen synthesis. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing spine surgery are at a particularly elevated risk of various complications due to chronic CKD-related systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. It is currently uncertain whether chronic steroid use in CKD patients exerts a protective effect postoperatively due to decreased systemic inflammation or instead is correlated with increased rates of wound complications. RESULTS: Using adjusted odds ratios to control for CKD-related comorbidities, our study of lumbar spine fusion patients who were chronic steroid users vs nonusers found no significant differences in rates of postoperative wound infections in later stage CKD patients. However, we also did not observe statistically significant reductions in hospital length of stay or rates of 30-day mortality, sepsis, or cardiac, pulmonary, and renal events. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate chronic steroid use neither contributes significantly to rates of wound infections nor exerts a protective effect against postoperative inflammatory complications in lumbar spine patients with CKD. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings do not support the practice of holding steroids in chronic users prior to lumbar spine surgery. Perioperative steroids do not appear to increase the risk of postoperative complications, but neither do they improve lumbar spine patient outcomes
    corecore