The semisolid bolus swallow test for clinical diagnosis of oropharyngeal dysphagia: a prospective randomised study

Contrary to clinical experience, clinical swallow tests are predominantly performed using water (water swallow tests, WST). In this study, we examine whether swallow tests performed using a bolus of semisolid food (bolus swallow test, BST) offer benefits. In a prospective, randomised, blind study, the results of a standardised saliva swallow test (SST), WST, BST, combinations of these tests and an endoscopic swallow test (FEES) in patients with oropharyngeal swallowing disorders of neurological (NEU) and non-neurological (NNEU) origin were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, test accuracy and inter-rater reliability were analysed. 62 patients (mean age = 64.68; range = 22–84) were included in the study (NEU = 40; NNEU = 22). A sensitivity of 70.7% (NEU = 70.3%, NNEU = 71.4%) and specificity of 82.5% (NEU = 92.3%; NNEU = 100%) were determined for the WST. The BST + SST was found to have a sensitivity of 89.6% (NEU = 66.7%; NNEU = 90.9%) and a specificity of 72.7% (NEU = 87.5%; NNEU = 90.9%). Analysis of test accuracy showed a statistically significant correlation between FEES and BST + SST. Only BST + SST exhibited statistically significant inter-rater reliability. BST in combination with SST was the sensitive clinical instrument for detecting aspiration both over the patient population as a whole and over the two sub-populations. Inter-rater reliability was found to be statistically significant. The results presented here demonstrate the benefit of semisolid food in investigating clinical dysphagia

Система бухгалтерского учета в средних общеобразовательных учреждениях на примере МБОУ «СОШ №2 города Юрги»

Данная выпускная квалификационная работа посвящена изучению особенностей бухгалтерского учета и организации финансов в бюджетных государственных предприятиях с последующим внесением предложений по их совершенствованию.This graduation qualification work is devoted to the study of the specifics of accounting and the organization of finance in budgetary state enterprises with subsequent proposals for their improvement

Guideline on multimodal rehabilitation for patients with post-intensive care syndrome

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survivors often experience several impairments in their physical, cognitive, and psychological health status, which are labeled as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The aim of this work is to develop a multidisciplinary and -professional guideline for the rehabilitative therapy of PICS.; A multidisciplinary/-professional task force of 15 healthcare professionals applied a structured, evidence-based approach to address 10 scientific questions. For each PICO-question (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome), best available evidence was identified. Recommendations were rated as "strong recommendation", "recommendation" or "therapy option", based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps were identified.; The evidence resulted in 12 recommendations, 4 therapy options, and one statement for the prevention or treatment of PICS.; early mobilization, motor training, and nutrition/dysphagia management should be performed. Delirium prophylaxis focuses on behavioral interventions. ICU diaries can prevent/treat psychological health issues like anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorders. Early rehabilitation approaches as well as long-term access to specialized rehabilitation centers are recommended. Therapy options include additional physical rehabilitation interventions. Statement: A prerequisite for the treatment of PICS are the regular and repeated assessments of the physical, cognitive and psychological health in patients at risk for or having PICS.; PICS is a variable and complex syndrome that requires an individual multidisciplinary, and multiprofessional approach. Rehabilitation of PICS should include an assessment and therapy of motor-, cognitive-, and psychological health impairments

Airway management in acute tetraplegics: a retrospective study

The objective of this study was to develop an evidence-based airway management protocol for patients with acute tetraplegia. The method consisted of an analysis of the medical records of patients (September 1997–December 2002) with a spinal cord injury and a neurological deficit less than 8 weeks old. Of the 175 patients, 72 (41, 14%) were tracheotomised. This was influenced by the origin of the paralysis, Frankel score, and number of cervical spine operations, accompanying injuries and accompanying illnesses. Tracheotomy did not affect the duration of treatment, duration of ventilation or length of stay in the intensive care unit. The need for a tracheotomy was able to be predicted in 73.31% with neurological level, Frankel score and severity of accompanying injuries. In patients with acute tetraplegia, primary tracheotomy is indicated in sub C1–C3 with Frankel stage A/B, sub C4–C6 with Frankel stage A/B with trauma and accompanying injuries/accompanying illnesses, and in patients with complex cervical spine trauma that requires a combined surgical approach. In other patients, an attempt at extubation should be made