European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery

Laparoscopic surgery changed the management of numerous surgical conditions. It was associated with many advantages over open surgery, such as decreased postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and excellent cosmesis. Since two decades single-incision endoscopic surgery (SIES) was introduced to the surgical community. SIES could possibly result in even better postoperative outcomes than multi-port laparoscopic surgery, especially concerning cosmetic outcomes and pain. However, the single-incision surgical procedure is associated with quite some challenges.This article is freely available via Open Access, click on the Publisher's URL to access the full-text.Publishe

Childhood brain tumors - InSight in Sight

Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children with an estimated age-adjusted incidence of 6.21 per 100,000. Recent advances in the diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of childhood brain tumors have considerably improved survival, with a current five-year survival rate reaching 75% in developed countries. This improved survival rate stresses the importance of awareness of the adverse effects coinciding with the brain tumor or its treatment. One of these adverse effects is an impaired visual function, which poses a substantial burden on the health, quality of life, and participation in daily life of children with a brain tumor. This thesis provides insight into the ophthalmological consequences in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumor and in the potential role of retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) as an objective, non-invasive testing method of the visual function. To investigate these aims, we designed and conducted the CCISS study (‘Child Central nervous tumors InSight in Sight’), a prospective nationwide longitudinal cohort study investigating visual impairment in 170 children newly diagnosed with a brain tumor between May 2019 and August 2021 in the Netherlands. Our analyses have shown that a major part of the children (79%) have ophthalmological abnormalities at brain tumor diagnosis and that ophthalmological abnormalities during examination were present in the majority of children (65%) who initially presented without visual symptoms. These findings stress the importance of standardized ophthalmological examination and the awareness of clinicians for latent ophthalmological abnormalities in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumor. In addition, we investigated the value of retinal OCT thickness measurements to discriminate an abnormal visual function in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumor. We found relatively high negative predictive values of average circumpapillary RNFL thickness (83%) and average macular GCL-IPL thickness (82%), but the positive predictive values (respectively 33% and 57%) were low, demonstrating a moderate diagnostic accuracy. This is also is in line with the low to moderate sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, at this moment, RNFL thickness and GCL-IPL thickness measurements cannot be used for clinical care decision making in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumor, nor should these measurements replace the thorough standard ophthalmological examination

Sleep problems and impact of obstructive hydrocephalus in newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumor patients

Background: Pediatric brain tumor patients are at risk of developing sleep problems. Previous studies were conducted in longer-term survivors or without comprehensive sleep evaluations, therefore it remains unclear whether and when problems arise. Insights can facilitate timely interventions. The aim is to examine sleep problems and contributing factors shortly after diagnosis. Methods: Children 6–16 years with a primary brain tumor (diagnosed ≤3 months) were recruited for a prospective study. Sleep was measured at home using wrist-worn actigraphy and questionnaires (PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep Related Impairment, self- and parent-reports). Mean PROMIS scores, prevalence of sleep problems (established by cut-off scores) and actigraphic outcomes were compared to norms (t-test, chi-square, linear regression). Risk factors were explored with multivariable linear regression models. Results: Sixty-nine children (68% male, mean age 11.6 ± 2.8 years, 53 ± 28 days after diagnosis) participated. Parents reported more child sleep disturbances (mean T = 53.7, P < .01) compared to norms. Rates of self- and parent-reported severe sleep disturbances were elevated (11% versus 5% in norms, P < .04). Parents also reported higher rates of moderate child sleep disturbance (31%) and sleep related impairment (42%) than norms (25%, P < .03). Actigraphy was comparable to healthy controls. Obstructive hydrocephalus was associated with longer sleep times (B=41.04, 95%CI 11.41;70.68) and shorter time since diagnosis with self-reported sleep disturbances (B=−.11, 95%CI −0.19;−0.03). Conclusion: Sleep problems are more frequently reported shortly after pediatric brain tumor diagnosis, compared to healthy controls. Attention for sleep around brain tumor diagnosis and impact of obstructive hydrocephalus is important, as sleep is vital for recovery and health-related quality of life

Visual functions in children with craniopharyngioma at diagnosis: A systematic review.

Childhood craniopharyngioma is a rare and slow growing brain tumour, often located in the sellar and suprasellar region. It commonly manifests with visual impairment, increased intracranial pressure and hypothalamic and/or pituitary deficiencies. Visual impairment in childhood adversely affects a child's daily functioning and quality of life. We systematically reviewed the literature to provide an extensive overview of the visual function in children with craniopharyngioma at diagnosis in order to estimate the diversity, magnitude and relevance of the problem of visual impairment. Of the 543 potentially relevant articles, 84 studies met our inclusion criteria. Visual impairment at diagnosis was reported in 1041 of 2071 children (50.3%), decreased visual acuity was reported in 546 of 1321 children (41.3%) and visual field defects were reported in 426 of 1111 children (38.3%). Other ophthalmological findings described were fundoscopic (32.5%) and orthoptic abnormalities (12.5%). Variations in ophthalmological testing methods and ophthalmological definitions precluded a meta-analysis. The results of this review confirm the importance of ophthalmological examination in children with craniopharyngioma at diagnosis in order to detect visual impairment and provide adequate support. Future studies should focus on long-term visual follow-up of childhood craniopharyngioma in response to different treatment strategies to provide insight in risks and ways to prevent further loss of vision

Diagnostic accuracy of retinal optical coherence tomography in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumour

Purpose: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of circumpapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness and macular ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness measurements to discriminate an abnormal visual function (i.e. abnormal age-based visual acuity and/or visual field defect) in children with a newly diagnosed brain tumour. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis of a prospective longitudinal nationwide cohort study was conducted at four hospitals in the Netherlands, including the national referral centre for paediatric oncology. Patients aged 0–18 years with a newly diagnosed brain tumour and reliable visual acuity and/or visual field examination and optical coherence tomography were included. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Of 115 patients included in the study (67 [58.3%] male; median age 10.6 years [range, 0.2–17.8 years]), reliable RNFL thickness and GCL-IPL thickness measurements were available in 92 patients (80.0%) and 84 patients (73.0%), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting an abnormal visual function was 74.5% for average RNFL thickness and 41.7% for average GCL-IPL thickness at a specificity of 44.5% and 82.9%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 33.0% and 82.6% for the average RNFL thickness and 57.1% and 82.2% for the average GCL-IPL thickness. Conclusion: An abnormal visual function was discriminated correctly by using the average RNFL thickness in seven out of ten patients and by using the average GCL-IPL thickness in four out of ten patients. The relatively high NPVs signified that patients with normal average RNFL thickness and average GCL-IPL thickness measurements had a relative high certainty of a normal visual function

Ocular findings in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A systematic literature review and results of a Dutch multicenter study

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a multisystem disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1:3000 live births. Manifestations show a marked variability in expression and include speech- and language delay, intellectual disability, and neuropsychiatric disorders. We aim to provide an overview of ocular findings in 22q11.2DS in order to optimize recommendations for ophthalmic screening. We combined results from a systematic literature review with results from a multicenter cross-sectional study of patients with 22q11.2DS who were assessed by an ophthalmologist. Our systematic literature search yielded four articles, describing 270 patients. We included 132 patients in our cross-sectional study (median age 8.9 [range 0–56] years). Most reported ocular findings were retinal vascular tortuosity (32%–78%), posterior embryotoxon (22%–50%), eye lid hooding (20%–67%), strabismus (12%–36%), amblyopia (2%–11%), ptosis (4%–6%), and refractive errors, of which hyperopia (6%–48%) and astigmatism (3%–23%) were most common. Visual acuity was (near) normal in most patients (91%–94%). Refractive errors, strabismus, and amblyopia are treatable conditions that are frequently present in patients with 22q11.2DS and should be corrected at an early stage. Therefore, in 22q11.2DS, we recommend ophthalmic and orthoptic screening at the age of 3 years or at diagnosis, and a low-threshold referral in adults

Ocular findings in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A systematic literature review and results of a Dutch multicenter study

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a multisystem disorder with an estimated prevalence of 1:3000 live births. Manifestations show a marked variability in expression and include speech- and language delay, intellectual disability, and neuropsychiatric disorders. We aim to provide an overview of ocular findings in 22q11.2DS in order to optimize recommendations for ophthalmic screening. We combined results from a systematic literature review with results from a multicenter cross-sectional study of patients with 22q11.2DS who were assessed by an ophthalmologist. Our systematic literature search yielded four articles, describing 270 patients. We included 132 patients in our cross-sectional study (median age 8.9 [range 0–56] years). Most reported ocular findings were retinal vascular tortuosity (32%–78%), posterior embryotoxon (22%–50%), eye lid hooding (20%–67%), strabismus (12%–36%), amblyopia (2%–11%), ptosis (4%–6%), and refractive errors, of which hyperopia (6%–48%) and astigmatism (3%–23%) were most common. Visual acuity was (near) normal in most patients (91%–94%). Refractive errors, strabismus, and amblyopia are treatable conditions that are frequently present in patients with 22q11.2DS and should be corrected at an early stage. Therefore, in 22q11.2DS, we recommend ophthalmic and orthoptic screening at the age of 3 years or at diagnosis, and a low-threshold referral in adults

Ophthalmological Findings in Youths with a Newly Diagnosed Brain Tumor

Importance: Visual impairment is an irreversible adverse effect in individuals who experienced a childhood brain tumor. Ophthalmological evaluation at diagnosis enables early detection of vision loss, decision-making about treatment, and when applicable, the timely use of visual interventions. However, awareness of visual impairment in clinical practice is suboptimal, and adherence to ophthalmological evaluation needs to be improved. Objective: To assess the prevalence and types of abnormal ophthalmological findings in youths with a newly diagnosed brain tumor. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this nationwide, prospective cohort study, youths aged 0 to 18 years with a newly diagnosed brain tumor between May 15, 2019, and August 11, 2021, were consecutively enrolled in 4 hospitals in the Netherlands, including the dedicated tertiary referral center for pediatric oncology care. Exposures: A standardized and comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including orthoptic evaluation, visual acuity testing, visual field examination, and ophthalmoscopy, was performed within 4 weeks from brain tumor diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were prevalence and types of visual symptoms and abnormal ophthalmological findings at brain tumor diagnosis. Results: Of 170 youths included in the study (96 [56.5%] male; median age, 8.3 years [range, 0.2-17.8 years]), 82 (48.2%) had infratentorial tumors; 53 (31.2%), supratentorial midline tumors; and 35 (20.6%), cerebral hemisphere tumors. A total of 161 patients (94.7%) underwent orthoptic evaluation (67 [41.6%] preoperatively; 94 [58.4%] postoperatively); 152 (89.4%), visual acuity testing (63 [41.4%] preoperatively; 89 [58.6%] postoperatively); 121 (71.2%), visual field examination (49 [40.4%] preoperatively; 72 [59.6%] postoperatively); and 164 (96.5%), ophthalmoscopy (82 [50.0%] preoperatively; 82 [50.0%] postoperatively). Overall, 101 youths (59.4%) presented with visual symptoms at diagnosis. Abnormal findings were found in 134 patients (78.8%) during ophthalmological examination. The most common abnormal findings were papilledema in 86 of 164 patients (52.4%) who underwent ophthalmoscopy, gaze deficits in 54 of 161 (33.5%) who underwent orthoptic evaluation, visual field defects in 32 of 114 (28.1%) with reliable visual field examination, nystagmus in 40 (24.8%) and strabismus in 32 (19.9%) of 161 who underwent orthoptic evaluation, and decreased visual acuity in 13 of 152 (8.6%) with reliable visual acuity testing. Forty-five of 69 youths (65.2%) without visual symptoms at diagnosis had ophthalmological abnormalities on examination. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that there is a high prevalence of abnormal ophthalmological findings in youths at brain tumor diagnosis regardless of the presence of visual symptoms. These findings support the need of standardized ophthalmological examination and the awareness of ophthalmologists and referring oncologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons for ophthalmological abnormalities in this patient group

Ophthalmological Findings in Youths with a Newly Diagnosed Brain Tumor

Importance: Visual impairment is an irreversible adverse effect in individuals who experienced a childhood brain tumor. Ophthalmological evaluation at diagnosis enables early detection of vision loss, decision-making about treatment, and when applicable, the timely use of visual interventions. However, awareness of visual impairment in clinical practice is suboptimal, and adherence to ophthalmological evaluation needs to be improved. Objective: To assess the prevalence and types of abnormal ophthalmological findings in youths with a newly diagnosed brain tumor. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this nationwide, prospective cohort study, youths aged 0 to 18 years with a newly diagnosed brain tumor between May 15, 2019, and August 11, 2021, were consecutively enrolled in 4 hospitals in the Netherlands, including the dedicated tertiary referral center for pediatric oncology care. Exposures: A standardized and comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including orthoptic evaluation, visual acuity testing, visual field examination, and ophthalmoscopy, was performed within 4 weeks from brain tumor diagnosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were prevalence and types of visual symptoms and abnormal ophthalmological findings at brain tumor diagnosis. Results: Of 170 youths included in the study (96 [56.5%] male; median age, 8.3 years [range, 0.2-17.8 years]), 82 (48.2%) had infratentorial tumors; 53 (31.2%), supratentorial midline tumors; and 35 (20.6%), cerebral hemisphere tumors. A total of 161 patients (94.7%) underwent orthoptic evaluation (67 [41.6%] preoperatively; 94 [58.4%] postoperatively); 152 (89.4%), visual acuity testing (63 [41.4%] preoperatively; 89 [58.6%] postoperatively); 121 (71.2%), visual field examination (49 [40.4%] preoperatively; 72 [59.6%] postoperatively); and 164 (96.5%), ophthalmoscopy (82 [50.0%] preoperatively; 82 [50.0%] postoperatively). Overall, 101 youths (59.4%) presented with visual symptoms at diagnosis. Abnormal findings were found in 134 patients (78.8%) during ophthalmological examination. The most common abnormal findings were papilledema in 86 of 164 patients (52.4%) who underwent ophthalmoscopy, gaze deficits in 54 of 161 (33.5%) who underwent orthoptic evaluation, visual field defects in 32 of 114 (28.1%) with reliable visual field examination, nystagmus in 40 (24.8%) and strabismus in 32 (19.9%) of 161 who underwent orthoptic evaluation, and decreased visual acuity in 13 of 152 (8.6%) with reliable visual acuity testing. Forty-five of 69 youths (65.2%) without visual symptoms at diagnosis had ophthalmological abnormalities on examination. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that there is a high prevalence of abnormal ophthalmological findings in youths at brain tumor diagnosis regardless of the presence of visual symptoms. These findings support the need of standardized ophthalmological examination and the awareness of ophthalmologists and referring oncologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons for ophthalmological abnormalities in this patient group