6 research outputs found

    Matrix of environmental attributes and shoreline classes.

    No full text
    <p>Check marks indicate significant impacts were expected; empty cells indicate that no significant effect was anticipated for the range of water level changes being considered.</p

    Seven Lake Ontario water management plans defined by the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board [9].

    No full text
    <p>Seven Lake Ontario water management plans defined by the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study Board <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003806#pone.0003806-Lake1" target="_blank">[9]</a>.</p

    Relationships between Lake Ontario water level and environmental attributes.

    No full text
    <p>A) bank swallow nesting in bluff habitat, B) piping plover nest area on sand beaches, C) benthic invertebrate habitat along coarse beaches, D) rock bass habitat along coarse beaches, E) killdeer foraging and nesting area on coarse beaches. Relationships for both baymouth-barrier beach shorelines and protected wetland and backwater shoreline classes: F) area of submerged aquatic vegetation, G) area of emergent vegetation, and H) area of wetland vegetation. Baymouth-barrier beach shoreline relations included: I) suitability of habitat for Northern pike embryos and the earliest fry stages, J) nesting suitability for black tern, and K) nesting suitability for king rail. Relations only for the protected wetland and backwater shoreline classes were: L) suitability of habitat for bowfin early life stages, M) area of rainbow smelt adult staging and early life rearing habitat, N) nesting suitability for marsh wren, and O) suitability of habitat for overwintering beaver.</p

    Environmental attributes for assessing impacts of water level regulation on Lake Ontario using management and public interests.

    No full text
    <p>Environmental attributes for assessing impacts of water level regulation on Lake Ontario using management and public interests.</p

    Shoreline classes for assessing lake level effects throughout the Great Lakes.

    No full text
    <p>The classes were identified, characterized, and illustrated by Stewart and Pope <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003806#pone.0003806-Stewart1" target="_blank">[25]</a> and later refined and applied to all shoreline segments in the US and Canada. The percentage of the Lake Ontario shoreline composed of each class and its basic features relative to potential impacts are provided. Not included are artificial shorelines and other minor classes. Drawings included here were made from sketches in Stewart and Pope <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003806#pone.0003806-Stewart1" target="_blank">[25]</a>.</p

    A sample 3-year sequence of monthly water levels under each water management plan.

    No full text
    <p>Simulated data were obtained from the Lake Ontario - St. Lawrence River Study Board <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0003806#pone.0003806-Lake1" target="_blank">[9]</a>. Elevation in meters IGLD 1985 (International Great Lakes Datum of 1985) is the current standard that includes a baseline adjustment for glacial rebound in the earth's crust under the Great Lakes.</p
    corecore