The origin of overpressure in 'old' sedimentary basins: an example from the Cooper Basin, Australia

The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.comOverpressure in 'old' sedimentary basins that have not undergone rapid, recent sedimentation cannot be easily explained using traditional burial-driven mechanisms. The last significant burial event in the Cooper Basin, Australia, was the Late Cretaceous deposition of the Winton Formation (98.5-90 Ma). Maximum temperature in the basin was attained during the Late Cretaceous, with cooling beginning prior to 75 Ma. Hence, overpressure related to rapid burial or palaeomaximum temperatures (e.g. hydrocarbon generation) must have developed prior to 75 Ma. Retaining overpressure for 75 Ma in 'old' basins such as the Cooper Basin requires extremely low seal permeabilities. An alternative explanation is that overpressure in the Cooper Basin has been generated because of an increase in mean stress associated with an increase in horizontal compressive stress since Late Cretaceous times. Structural observations and contemporary stress data indicate that there has been an increase in mean stress of approximately 50 MPa between Late Cretaceous times to that presently measured at 3780 m. The largest measured overpressure in the Cooper Basin is 14.5 MPa at 3780 m in the Kirby 1 well. Hence, disequilibrium compaction driven by increasing mean stress can explain the magnitude of the observed overpressure in the Cooper Basin. Increases in mean stress (tectonic loading) may be a feasible mechanism for overpressure generation in other 'old' basins that have undergone a recent increase in horizontal stress (e.g. Anadarko Basin).P. Van Ruth, R. Hillis, P. Tingate and R. Swarbric

Assessing palaeobathymetry and sedimentation rates using palynomaceral analysis: a study of modern sediments from the Gulf of Papua, offshore Papua New Guinea

© 2015 © 2015 AASP - The Palynological Society. Palynologists interested in better understanding the sedimentation and energy of depositional environments have often included studies of palynomaceral fragments, particularly when performing palynofacies analyses. Due to the difficult nature of classifying these fragments, researchers have developed numerous, often overlapping, classification schemes. These different schemes make it difficult to compare and contrast between research projects. Determining the appropriate scheme to apply when counting these fragments can be confusing, and application of these schemes can yield inconclusive results, especially when sedimentation and energy are in constant flux. A scheme of five categories, including brown wood (palynomaceral 1-2), leaf cuticle (palynomaceral 3), black debris (palynomaceral 4), structureless organic matter (SOM) and resin, is utilised here. It is applied to the analysis of 64 modern samples from the top 0-4 cm of sediment collected throughout the Gulf of Papua, Papua New Guinea. These samples span a suite of common marine depositional environments: river mouths and deltas, the proximal portion of the continental shelf dominated by a large clinoform, and turbidite and hemipelagic/pelagic deposits on the slope and in the deep ocean basin. Principal component analysis (PCA) confirms this simplified classification scheme provides an indirect means of assessing distance from shore and shelf-slope break, overall water depth and sediment accumulation rate, but other factors, such as processing technique, marine productivity, sediment source, time in transport and residence and bioturbation, are taken into account to fully explain distribution