Inodilator versus inotrope: do inodilators have an edge to improve outcome in patients with heart failure or cardiac dysfunction?

Numerous meta-analyses on inotropes (dobutamine) and inodilators (milrinone, levosimendan) suggest that their impact on survival are at best neutral (but may be deleterious) whereas levosimendan seems to have beneficial effects on survival in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) syndromes. The aim of this essay is to attempt to explain these results through a conceptual framework of cardiocirculatory (patho)physiology. Many clinical studies in AHF have been based and interpreted on a ‘cardiocentric’ framework. The three above-mentioned categories of drugs are thought to increase cardiac output (CO) by increasing only heart muscle contraction (inotropes) or by also decreasing systemic vascular resistance (inodilators). We complement this ‘cardiocentric’ framework with a more integrated one based on (i) the effects of drugs on venous return (VR), equal to CO (VR is the difference between mean systemic and right atrial pressures divided by venous resistance; maintenance of adequate VR depends on the stressed blood volume); inodilators may decrease the stressed volume and therefore may decrease VR; (ii) the coupling of the left ventricle–aorta and right ventricle–pulmonary artery (dependent on the compliance of the large arteries), which is increased by inodilators in the absence of measurable effects on arterial systemic/pulmonary pressures) and (iii) the vascular waterfall phenomenon, which explains that inodilators, by decreasing intra-organ arterial resistance, can improve organ perfusion even in previously mildly hypotensive patients (in the absence of cardiogenic shock). The challenge is to transform these concepts into clinical tools to guide therapy in AHF syndromes

Editorial—Special issue of the 7th European workshop on lipid mediators

The Seventh European Workshop on Lipid Mediators (7EWLM) was held at Université catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium September 12-14, 2018. The aim of the workshop was to bring together those researchers and students interested in the field of bioactive lipid mediators. The seventh edition of this biennial workshop was organized by Giulio Muccioli, Mireille Alhouayek, Gerard Bannenberg, Joan Clària, Per-Johan Jakobsson, Xavier Norel, Nils Helge Schebb and Chengcan Yao. The three-day event provided a good opportunity for participants to present their work, and enjoy a variety of presentations by experts, a session for young scientists, an educational session on analytical chemistry of lipid mediators, and poster sessions (see full program and download the abstract book athttps://workshop-lipid.eu//7EWLM/index.php?cat=Program) [...

Prostanoid receptors in GtoPdb v.2023.1

Prostanoid receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Prostanoid Receptors [701]) are activated by the endogenous ligands prostaglandins PGD2, PGE1, PGE2 , PGF2α, PGH2, prostacyclin [PGI2] and thromboxane A2. Differences and similarities between human and rodent prostanoid receptor orthologues, and their specific roles in pathophysiologic conditions are reviewed in [452]. Measurement of the potency of PGI2 and thromboxane A2 is hampered by their instability in physiological salt solution; they are often replaced by cicaprost and U46619, respectively, in receptor characterization studies

Prostanoid receptors in GtoPdb v.2023.1

Prostanoid receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Prostanoid Receptors [701]) are activated by the endogenous ligands prostaglandins PGD2, PGE1, PGE2 , PGF2α, PGH2, prostacyclin [PGI2] and thromboxane A2. Differences and similarities between human and rodent prostanoid receptor orthologues, and their specific roles in pathophysiologic conditions are reviewed in [452]. Measurement of the potency of PGI2 and thromboxane A2 is hampered by their instability in physiological salt solution; they are often replaced by cicaprost and U46619, respectively, in receptor characterization studies

Prostanoid receptors in GtoPdb v.2021.2

Prostanoid receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Prostanoid Receptors [694]) are activated by the endogenous ligands prostaglandins PGD2, PGE1, PGE2 , PGF2α, PGH2, prostacyclin [PGI2] and thromboxane A2. Differences and similarities between human and rodent prostanoid receptor orthologues, and their specific roles in pathophysiologic conditions are reviewed in [448]. Measurement of the potency of PGI2 and thromboxane A2 is hampered by their instability in physiological salt solution; they are often replaced by cicaprost and U46619, respectively, in receptor characterization studies

Prostanoid receptors (version 2019.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Prostanoid receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Prostanoid Receptors [644]) are activated by the endogenous ligands prostaglandins PGD2, PGE1, PGE2 , PGF2α, PGH2, prostacyclin [PGI2] and thromboxane A2. Measurement of the potency of PGI2 and thromboxane A2 is hampered by their instability in physiological salt solution; they are often replaced by cicaprost and U46619, respectively, in receptor characterization studies

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology: Differences and similarities between human and rodents concerning prostaglandin EP1-4 and IP receptors: Specific roles in pathophysiologic conditions

Prostaglandins are derived from arachidonic acid metabolism through cyclooxygenase activities. Among prostaglandins (PGs), prostacyclin (PGI(2)) and PGE(2) are strongly involved in the regulation of homeostasis and main physiologic functions. In addition, the synthesis of these two prostaglandins is significantly increased during inflammation. PGI(2) and PGE(2) exert their biologic actions by binding to their respective receptors, namely prostacyclin receptor (IP) and prostaglandin E-2 receptor (EP) 1-4, which belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors. IP and EP1-4 receptors are widely distributed in the body and thus play various physiologic and pathophysiologic roles. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in studies using pharmacological approaches, genetically modified animals, and genome-wide association studies regarding the roles of IP and EP1-4 receptors in the immune, cardiovascular, nervous, gastrointestinal, respiratory, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal systems. In particular, we highlight similarities and differences between human and rodents in terms of the specific roles of IP and EP1-4 receptors and their downstream signaling pathways, functions, and activities for each biologic system. We also highlight the potential novel therapeutic benefit of targeting IP and EP1-4 receptors in several diseases based on the scientific advances, animal models, and human studies

Prostanoid receptors (version 2020.4) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Prostanoid receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Prostanoid Receptors [661]) are activated by the endogenous ligands prostaglandins PGD2, PGE1, PGE2 , PGF2α, PGH2, prostacyclin [PGI2] and thromboxane A2. Differences and similarities between human and rodent prostanoid receptor orthologues, and their specific roles in pathophysiologic conditions are reviewed in [423]. Measurement of the potency of PGI2 and thromboxane A2 is hampered by their instability in physiological salt solution; they are often replaced by cicaprost and U46619, respectively, in receptor characterization studies

Prostanoid receptors (version 2019.5) in the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology Database

Prostanoid receptors (nomenclature as agreed by the NC-IUPHAR Subcommittee on Prostanoid Receptors [659]) are activated by the endogenous ligands prostaglandins PGD2, PGE1, PGE2 , PGF2α, PGH2, prostacyclin [PGI2] and thromboxane A2. Measurement of the potency of PGI2 and thromboxane A2 is hampered by their instability in physiological salt solution; they are often replaced by cicaprost and U46619, respectively, in receptor characterization studies

THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22: G protein-coupled receptors

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22 is the fifth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews, mostly in tabular format, of the key properties of nearly 1900 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide constitutes over 500 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. It provides a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates. The full contents of this section can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/bph.15538. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. The landscape format of the Concise Guide is designed to facilitate comparison of related targets from material contemporary to mid-2021, and supersedes data presented in the 2019/20, 2017/18, 2015/16 and 2013/14 Concise Guides and previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC-IUPHAR), therefore, providing official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate