21 research outputs found

    External validation of a subset of upregulated genes in cohort 2 that validated in cohort 1

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "An integrative model for recurrence in ovarian cancer"</p><p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/7/1/8</p><p>Molecular Cancer 2008;7():8-8.</p><p>Published online 22 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2248209.</p><p></p> Bars indicate the relative overexpression of target genes in recurrent vs primary tumors. IL1R2 and ZNF218 gave the best distinction between recurrent and primary tumors with greater than twofold changes

    Gene families involved in the molecular regulation of recurrence in ovarian cancer

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "An integrative model for recurrence in ovarian cancer"</p><p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/7/1/8</p><p>Molecular Cancer 2008;7():8-8.</p><p>Published online 22 Jan 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2248209.</p><p></p> Some of the upregulated genes in recurrent compared to primary ovarian carcinomas that we validated in cohort 2 belong in the same gene families with some of the upregulated genes validated in cohort 1. Upregulation of tight junction proteins and EGFR ligands, development of a cytokine response via interleukin receptors and intracellular signaling via calcium binding S100 proteins seem to contribute to the "recurrent" signature and possibly have a role in drug resistance

    Figure illustrating common biological pathways identified when the lists of predicted targets for miR-9 and miR-223 were exported in the Panther classification system and examined against the H

    No full text
    sapiens reference list to determine the percentage of genes compared to what expected. Common pathways between the top dysregulated genes were significant at a p < 0.05 as highlighted by the orange bars.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Potential role of miR-9 and miR-223 in recurrent ovarian cancer"</p><p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/7/1/35</p><p>Molecular Cancer 2008;7():35-35.</p><p>Published online 28 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2383925.</p><p></p

    Prevalence of tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 dysfunction in unselected patients with ovarian cancer

    No full text
    Objective: The therapeutic benefits of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors highlight the need to evaluate BRCA1/2 defects in tubal/ovarian cancer (OC). We sought to determine the pattern and disease characteristics associated with tumor BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1 methylation in women with OC. Methods: We obtained 111 OC specimens from 2 university hospitals and assessed BRCA1/2 mutations and BRCA1 methylation in tumor DNA. The frequency and pattern of BRCA1/2 defects were examined. Associations between patient/disease characteristics and BRCA1/2 defects were ascertained (Fisher's exact test). Platinum-free interval (PFI), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) based on the underlying BRCA1/2 defect were determined (Kaplan-Meier analysis [log-rank test]). Results: We observed a BRCA1/2 dysfunction rate of 40% (28/70) in high-grade serous tubal/ovarian cancer (HGSC), including 14.3% BRCA1 methylation (n=10), 7.1% BRCA1 mutation (n=5), and 18.6% BRCA2 mutation (n=13). Defects in BRCA1/2 genes were associated with stage III/IV HGSC (BRCA1 methylation: P=0.005 [stage III/IV] and P=0.004 [HGSC]; BRCA1/2 mutation: P=0.03 [stage III/IV] and P Conclusion: We observed a high tumor BRCA1/2 dysfunction rate in HGSC with a unique predominance of BRCA2 over BRCA1 mutations. While BRCA1/2 mutations conferred survival benefits in OC, no such association was observed with BRCA1 methylation.</p

    Differentially expressed miRNAs in recurrent versus primary ovarian cancers

    No full text
    Relative fold changes are displayed on the y axis and the miRNAs are on the x axis. The most significant altered expression was observed for mir-223 (up) and mir-9 (down).<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Potential role of miR-9 and miR-223 in recurrent ovarian cancer"</p><p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/7/1/35</p><p>Molecular Cancer 2008;7():35-35.</p><p>Published online 28 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2383925.</p><p></p

    Global staining pattern for eIF6 (e) and Dicer (f) in a TMA of primary serous papillary ovarian adenocarcinomas

    No full text
    Global staining pattern for eiF6 and Dicer in the TMA of recurrent ovarian tumours is not shown. Analysis was based on relative expression levels of eIF6 and Dicer in primary vs recurrent tumours.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Potential role of miR-9 and miR-223 in recurrent ovarian cancer"</p><p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/7/1/35</p><p>Molecular Cancer 2008;7():35-35.</p><p>Published online 28 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2383925.</p><p></p

    Unsupervised hierarchical cluster heatmap based on differential miRNA expression patterns identified in the initial cohort

    No full text
    Vertical bars represent the samples and the horizontal bars represent the miRNA genes. Green bars reflect downregulated genes and red bars upregulated genes. Interestingly, P3 clusters with the recurrent samples on the left of the heatmap. P3 relapsed within 6 months post completion of treatment and should be considered "chemoresistant" P, primary tumours; R, recurrent tumors.<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Potential role of miR-9 and miR-223 in recurrent ovarian cancer"</p><p>http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/7/1/35</p><p>Molecular Cancer 2008;7():35-35.</p><p>Published online 28 Apr 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2383925.</p><p></p

    The effect of silencing MyD88 and TLR4 mRNA on the chemoresponsive properties of SKOV-3 cells.

    No full text
    <p>SKOV-3 cells were left untransfected (Unt), transfected with negative control siRNA (siNeg), MyD88 targeting siRNA (siMyD88) or TLR4 targeting siRNA (siTLR4). The transfected cells were incubated for 72 hrs before either harvesting for mRNA analysis (A), for protein analysis (B) or treatment with paclitaxel (C). (A) MyD88 and TLR4 mRNA expression levels were evaluated by TaqMan RT-PCR. MyD88 and TLR4 mRNA expression was normalised to that of an endogenous control, B2M, and calibrated to that of untreated cells to establish the relative percentage of mRNA expression (n = 3, mean +SD). (B) MyD88 and TLR4 mRNA expression levels were evaluated by western blot analysis. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (C) Transfected cells were either left untreated, treated with DMSO (vehicle control) or 3.5 nM of paclitaxel (IC25). 48 hrs post treatment, cell viability was assessed by means of the CCK-8 assay. % cell viability rate was calculated by comparing the absorbance values for the vehicle control to the corresponding paclitaxel treated samples. Results are expressed as mean +SD, n = 3; *p<0.05, **p<0.01 (un-paired Student's t-test).</p
    corecore