49 research outputs found

    Comparison of omeprazole, metronidazole and clarithromycin with omeprazole/amoxicillin dual-therapy for the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

    Get PDF
    In this randomized, multicenter trial, we evaluated the effectiveness and side effect profile of a modified omeprazole-based triple therapy to cure Helicobacter pylori infection. The control group consisted of patients treated with standard dual therapy comprising omeprazole and amoxicillin. One hundred and fifty-seven H. pylori infected patients with duodenal ulcers were randomly assigned to receive either a combination of omeprazole 10 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg (OCM) given three times daily for 10 days (n = 81),or a combination of omeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g (OA) given twice daily for 14 days (n = 76). Prior to treatment and after 2 and 6 weeks, gastric biopsies from the antrum and corpus were obtained for histology and H. pylori culture. H. pylori infection was cured in 97.4% after OCM and in 65.8% after OA in the per-protocol analysis (p < 0.001) (intention-to-treat analysis: 93.4% and 63.2%, respectively). H. pylori was successfully cultured in 122 patients (77%). The overall rate of metronidazole resistance was 19.7% (24/122), no primary resistance to clarithromycin or amoxicillin was found. In the OCM group, all patients infected with metronidazole-sensitive H. pylori strains (n = 51) and those infected with strains of unknown susceptibility to metronidazole (n = 14)were cured (100%), while 77% (10/13) of those harboring metronidazole-resistant. strains were cured of the infection (p = 0.36). Side effects leading to premature termination of treatment occurred in 2.5% of the patients in the OCM group and in 1.4 % of the OA group. We conclude that combined treatment with omeprazole, clarithromycin and a higher dose of metronidazole is highly effective in curing H, pylori infection, Helicobacter pylori omeprazole and that this regimen remains very effective in the presence of metronidazole resistant strains

    Extensively drug resistant tuberculosis in a high income country: A report of four unrelated cases

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Multi drug resistance <it>of Mycobacterium tuberculosis </it>(<it>M. tuberculosis</it>) remains a major threat to public health, reinforced by recent reports about the clinical course of patients infected with extensively drug resistant (XDR) strains in South Africa. There is little information about the clinical course of XDR tuberculosis patients in industrialised countries.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We evaluated all isolates of <it>M. tuberculosis</it>, in which drug susceptibility testing was performed at our institution since 1997, for multi and extensive drug resistance. Clinical courses of patients infected by strains fulfilling the recently revised criteria for XDR tuberculosis were analysed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Four XDR <it>M. tuberculosis </it>isolates were identified. All patients had immigrated to Germany from Russia, Georgia, and former Yugoslavia and none were infected by the human immunodeficiency virus. All patients where treated for tuberculosis for 5.5 to 15 years and for XDR tuberculosis for 1.9 to 2.5 years. They received inhospital treatment in Germany for 11 months, 4.5 years and twice for 6 years. Non-compliance was an important factor in all four patients, three patients had to be treated in Germanys only locked facility for tuberculosis treatment. One patient with XDR tuberculosis died, one patient had still open pulmonary tuberculosis at last contact and 2 patients were cured.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Cases of XDR tuberculosis have been treated in our region for several years. Even in a high income setting, XDR tuberculosis has a tremendous impact on quality of live, outcome and the total cost. All reasonable efforts to prevent the spread of XDR tuberculosis must be made and maintained.</p

    Real-Time Fluorescence PCR Assays for Detection and Characterization of Shiga Toxin, Intimin, and Enterohemolysin Genes from Shiga Toxin-Producing \u3ci\u3eEscherichia coli\u3c/i\u3e

    Get PDF
    PCR assays have proved useful for detecting and characterizing Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Recent advances in PCR technology have facilitated the development of real-time fluorescence PCR assays with greatly reduced amplification times and improved methods for the detection of amplified target sequences. We developed and evaluated two such assays for the LightCycler instrument: one that simultaneously detects the genes for Shiga toxins 1 and 2 (stx1 and stx2) and another that simultaneously detects the genes for intimin (eae) and enterohemolysin (E-hly). Amplification and sequence-specific detection of the two target genes were completed within 60 min. Findings from the testing of 431 STEC isolates of human and animal origin, 73 isolates of E. coli negative for stx genes, and 118 isolates of other bacterial species with the LightCycler PCR (LC-PCR) assays were compared with those obtained by conventional block cycler PCR analysis. The sensitivities and specificities of the LC-PCR assays were each 100% for the stx1, eae, and E-hly genes and 96 and 100%, respectively, for the stx2 gene. No stx2 genes were detected from 10 stx2f- positive isolates because of significant nucleotide differences in their primer annealing regions. Melting curve analyses of the amplified Shiga toxin genes revealed sequence variation within each of the tested genes that correlated with described and novel gene variants. The performance characteristics of the LC-PCR assays, such as their speed, detection method, and the potential subtyping information available from melting curve analyses, make them attractive alternatives to block cycler PCR assays for detecting and characterizing STEC strains

    Introduction of quality management causes mainly internal process optimization

    No full text
    Quality assurance is mandatory in transfusion medicine. Though the resource requirements for quality management are usually obvious, the benefits are sometimes more obscure. We report retrospectively on the first 22 months of experience with the introduction of a quality management program in a laboratory and transfusion medical institute of an university hospital. Among the introduced measures were, apart from qualification, validation and standard operating procedures, the systematic acquisition of deviations, corrective action requests, and out-ofspecification (OOS) procedures as well as quality reviews. An average of 3.0% OOS per apheresis and 5.9 corrective action requests were recorded per month since their introduction. Three types of errors became obvious with some of them being particularly trivial. In one instance, a batchrelated problem of starting materials was observed. In three instances, deviations were related to the equipment and could be compensated by adjustment settings of the equipment or by renewal of necessary components. The quantification of equipment reliance showed to be advantageous both for patient safety and economically in negotiation settings. In two instances, staff-related errors were identified that could be addressed by cutting unnecessary procedure steps or by targeted training measures. The introduction of a quality management system started to create transparency and resulted in optimizations especially in procedures that involve more than one team
    corecore