ヒト大腸癌肝転移におけるHVEM発現の重要性について

Background: Herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) has been suggested to play various roles in cancer biology. The authors report that HVEM expression in tumor cells is associated with a reduction in the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a poor prognosis after surgical resection in various human gastrointestinal cancers. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of HVEM expression in human colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Methods: This study examined the cases of 104 patients with CRLM who underwent curative liver resection at Nara Medical University between 2000 and 2014. The median follow-up period was 50.2 months. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using antibodies against HVEM, CD4, CD8, and CD45RO. Results: High HVEM expression was observed in 49 patients (47.1%) with CRLM. Expression of HVEM was not associated with age, gender, administration of preoperative chemotherapy, tumor size, number of tumors, or histologic differentiation. The high-HVEM group exhibited significantly worse overall survival (OS) than the low-HVEM group (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis showed that high HVEM expression in CRLM, age of 70 years or older, and having five or more tumors are independent poor prognostic factors for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-7.93; P = 0.006). The number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and CD45RO+ T cells was significantly lower in the high-HVEM group than in the low-HVEM group. High HVEM expression in primary colorectal cancer was significantly associated with synchronous CRLM, but not with metachronous CRLM. Conclusions: Tumor HVEM expression might play a critical role in CRLM.博士（医学）・乙第1447号・令和元年12月5日© Society of Surgical Oncology 2019This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Annals of surgical oncology. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07625-

大腸癌肝転移におけるCD200発現の臨床的意義

Background: Approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases. We evaluated the role of CD200, a potent immunosuppressive molecule, in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Methods: We examined 110 patients who underwent curative liver resection for CRLM at our institution between 2000 and 2016. Based on the results of immunohistochemical analysis, the patients were divided into high-CD200 (n = 47) and low-CD200 (n = 63) expression groups. The relationships between CD200 expression and various clinicopathological outcomes were investigated. Results: The overall survival (OS) of patients in the high-CD200 group was significantly worse than that in the low-CD200 group (p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed that the independent prognostic factors in CRLM were maximum tumor size > 30 mm (p = 0.002), preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level > 20 ng/mL (p < 0.001), primary CRC N2-3 (p = 0.049), and high-CD200 expression (p = 0.004). Furthermore, CD4+, CD8+, and CD45RO+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in CRLM were significantly higher in the low-CD200 group than in the high-CD200 group (p = 0.005, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy had higher CD200 expression than those who had not received preoperative chemotherapy, and OS was significantly worse in patients in the high-CD200 group who had received preoperative chemotherapy. Conclusions: CD200 expression was an independent prognostic factor in CRLM. CD200 may play a critical role in tumor immunity in CRLM, and can therefore be used as a potential therapeutic target in CRLM.博士（医学）・乙第1497号・令和3年3月15日© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09471-w

根治切除後の結腸癌StageⅡ、StageⅢ、及び大腸癌肝転移における原発部位が与える影響

Purpose: Primary tumor location of colon cancer has been reported to affect the prognosis after curative resection. However, some reports suggested the impact was varied by tumor stage. This study analyzed the prognostic impact of the sidedness of colon cancer in stages II, III, and liver metastasis after curative resection using propensity-matched analysis. Methods: Right-sided colon cancer was defined as a tumor located from cecum to splenic flexure, while any more distal colon cancer was defined as left-sided colon cancer. Patients who underwent curative resection at Nara Medical University hospital between 2000 and 2016 were analyzed. Results: There were 110 patients with stage II, 100 patients with stage III, and 106 patients with liver metastasis. After propensity matching, 28 pairs with stage II and 32 pairs with stage III were identified. In the patients with stage II, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were not significantly different for right- and left-sided colon cancers. In the patients with stage III, OS and RFS were significantly worse in right-sided colon cancer. In those with liver metastasis, OS of right-sided colon cancer was significantly worse than left-sided disease, while RFS was similar. Regarding metachronous liver metastasis, the difference was observed only in the patients whose primary colon cancer was stage III. In each stage, significantly higher rate of peritoneal recurrence was found in those with right-sided colon cancer. Conclusion: Sidedness of colon cancer had a significant and varied prognostic impact in patients with stage II, III, and liver metastasis after curative resection.博士（医学）・乙第1495号・令和3年3月15日Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Coloproctology.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Effect of CYP2C19 Polymorphism on Treatment Success in Lansoprazole-Based 7-Day Treatment Regimen for Cure of H. pylori Infection in Japan

Recently, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive peptic ulcer patients were treated by a 1-week triple therapy [lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg and clarithromycin 200 or 400 mg, each twice daily] without the checking CYP2C19 genotype in Japan. This regimen was done to obtain sufficient cure rates for H. pylori infection using a high dose of LPZ (60 mg/day) without the great cost of having to determine the genotype. However, the failure rate for eradicating H. pylori was reported to be 12.5%. The reasons for this were studied in 33 Japanese patients with H. pylori-positive gastric or duodenal ulcer. Blood samples of the patients were collected to determine the genotype of CYP2C19 and plasma concentrations of LPZ and its metabolites at 3 h postdose on the morning of the 7th day of treatment. H. pylori infection was cured in 25 of the 33 patients (75.8%). The cure rate was highest in the group of poor metabolizers (PM), intermediate in the group of extensive metabolizers of the heterozygous type (htEM) and lowest in the group of extensive metabolizers of the homozygous type (hmEM). The relative ratio of mean plasma concentration for LPZ among the 3 groups was 1.00:1.43:2.93 (hmEM:htEM:PM groups). Our data suggest that success of the eradication is dependent on the CYP2C19-related genotypic status or the plasma concentrations of LPZ in a steady state condition after a multiple dosing regimen; that is to say, checking CYP2C19 is necessary even on occasions when treatment is done by H. pylori eradication methods as performed in Japan

Preventative effects of ramelteon against postoperative delirium after elective liver resection.

BackgroundPostoperative delirium was reported to be associated with increased postoperative mortality after liver resection. Therefore, it is crucial to prevent postoperative delirium in such cases. Ramelteon, an agonist of melatonin receptor has been suggested to be useful for preventing delirium. The aim of this study was to examine whether ramelteon is effective at preventing delirium after elective liver resection.MethodsThe cases of patients who underwent liver resection at Nara Medical University (Nara, Japan) between January 2014 and August 2018 were analyzed. During the period from January 2017 to August 2018, ramelteon was prospectively administered to patients who underwent liver resection [8 mg/day on the day before surgery and on postoperative days 1 to 3] (ramelteon group), whereas ramelteon was not administered during the period from January 2014 to December 2016 (control group). The perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.ResultsThere were 120 patients in the ramelteon group and 186 patients in the control group. No significant intergroup differences in background factors, including age, gender, and preoperative serological laboratory data, were detected. The incidence of postoperative delirium was significantly lower in the ramelteon group (5.8% vs. 15.1%, P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis revealed that being aged ≥75 (P = 0.002), being male (P = 0.020), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.023), blood loss ≥1000ml (P = 0.001) and the absence of ramelteon treatment (P = 0.046) were independent risk factors for postoperative delirium.ConclusionThe administration of ramelteon might reduce the risk of postoperative delirium after elective liver resection

Liver Regeneration After Major Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Elderly

Background: With an aging population, more elderly patients are being considered for hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes including liver regeneration after major hepatectomy for HCC in the elderly. Methods: We assessed 41 patients who underwent major hepatectomy (≥3 segments) at our institute between 2000 and 2013. Patients were divided into two age groups, elderly group (age ≥70 years, n = 23) and younger group (age <70 years, n = 18). Clinicopathological data and outcomes were retrospectively compared. To evaluate the effect of aging on liver regeneration, we measured liver volumes preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months after liver resection using a 3D simulation imaging system. Results: Overall and major complications after hepatectomy were not different between elderly and younger groups, and no case of mortality was recorded. Moreover, recurrence-free and overall survivals were similar in both groups. With regard to liver regeneration, no differences were observed between elderly and younger groups at 1 and 6 months after liver resection. Baseline liver functions were comparable between the groups. Furthermore, the only factor associated with liver regeneration was resected liver volume (R2 = 0.631, p < 0.001). Age was not correlated with liver regeneration rate (R2 = 0.00537, p = 0.695). Conclusions: Liver regeneration after major hepatectomy for HCC was not affected by age and that resected liver volume is an important factor for liver regeneration. Short- and long-term outcomes after major hepatectomy were similar in elderly and younger patients

Current status of laparoscopic repeat liver resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

Repeat liver resection (RLR) is an effective treatment approach for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and can provide acceptable long-term outcomes in select patients. Recent randomized controlled trials comparing RLR with radiofrequency ablation revealed that the latter approach was associated with a higher rate of early recurrence compared with RLR. With recent advances in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), RLR has been increasingly performed using laparoscopy. Several propensity score-matched studies reported that laparoscopic RLR achieved lower blood loss and shorter hospital stays compared to open RLR. However, laparoscopic RLR requires more advanced techniques because of adhesions formed after the previous liver resection, changes in anatomical landmarks, and deformity of the remnant liver. The recently described difficulty classification of laparoscopic RLR is based on five factors including type of previous liver resection (open or laparoscopic), number of previous liver resections, surgical procedure used in previous liver resections, tumor location in previous liver resections, and difficulty score of LLR for recurrent HCC. We reviewed the available literature to summarize available evidence suggesting that laparoscopic RLR might be considered a more minimally invasive surgical treatment approach for recurrent HCC as long as the indication for laparoscopic RLR is carefully determined