Analysis of Prairie Vole Amylin Reveals the Importance of the N‑Terminus and Residue 22 in Amyloidogenicity and Cytotoxicity

Amyloid formation by amylin contributes to β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. The features that control the amyloidogenicity and toxicity of amylin are not understood. Not all species form islet amyloid, and its presence or absence correlates with the in vitro behavior of the polypeptide. Rats do not develop type 2 diabetes or islet amyloid, and rat amylin is non-amyloidogenic, except at very high concentrations. This has led to the notion that rodent amylins are non-amyloidogenic. Prairie vole amylin has an unusual sequence compared to those of human and rat amylin, including nonconservative Lys-1 to Glu and Asn-22 to Gly substitutions. The first reduces the net charge on the peptide, while the second disrupts a potential network of side chain hydrogen bonds in the amyloid fiber, a so-called Asn ladder. The prairie vole polypeptide forms amyloid more slowly than human amylin and is considerably less cytotoxic. An Asn-22 to Gly substitution in human amylin significantly reduces toxicity, increasing the effective concentration of amylin required to reach 50% toxicity by >7-fold, but has modest effects on the time to form amyloid. A Lys-1 to Glu replacement has a weaker effect but does reduce toxicity relative to that of human amylin, without having a significant impact on the time to form amyloid. The effect of the Lys-1 to Glu substitution on amyloid kinetics is more significant in Tris buffer than in phosphate-buffered saline. This work demonstrates that the N-terminus of amylin plays a role in modulating toxicity and highlights the key role of position 22

Analysis of Amylin Consensus Sequences Suggests That Human Amylin Is Not Optimized to Minimize Amyloid Formation and Provides Clues to Factors That Modulate Amyloidogenicity

The neuropancreatic polypeptide hormone amylin forms pancreatic islet amyloid in type-2 diabetes. Islet amyloid formation contributes to β-cell death in the disease and to the failure of islet transplants, but the features which influence amylin amyloidogenicity are not understood. We constructed an amino acid sequence alignment of 202 sequences of amylin and used the alignment to design consensus sequences of vertebrate amylins, mammalian amylins, and primate amylins. Amylin is highly conserved, but there are differences between human amylin and each consensus sequence, ranging from one to six substitutions. Biophysical analysis shows that all of the consensus sequences form amyloid but do so more slowly than human amylin in vitro. The rate of amyloid formation by the primate consensus sequence is 3- to 4-fold slower than human amylin; the mammalian consensus sequence is approximately 20- to 25-fold slower, and the vertebrate consensus sequence is approximately 6-fold slower. All of the consensus sequences are moderately less toxic than human amylin toward a cultured β-cell line, with the vertebrate consensus sequence displaying the largest reduction in toxicity of 3- to 4-fold. All of the consensus sequences activate a human amylin receptor and exhibit only modest reductions in activity, ranging from 3- to 4-fold as judged by a cAMP production assay. The analysis argues that there is no strong selective evolutionary pressure to avoid the formation of islet amyloid and provides information relevant to the design of less amyloidogenic amylin variants

Analysis of Proline Substitutions Reveals the Plasticity and Sequence Sensitivity of Human IAPP Amyloidogenicity and Toxicity

Pancreatic amyloid formation by the polypeptide IAPP contributes to β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. There is a 1:1 correspondence between the ability of IAPP from different species to form amyloid in vitro and the susceptibility of the organism to develop diabetes. Rat IAPP is non-amyloidogenic and differs from human IAPP at six positions, including three proline replacements: A25P, S28P, and S29P. Incorporation of these proline residues into human IAPP leads to a non-amyloidogenic analogue that is used clinically. The role of the individual proline residues is not understood. We examine the three single and three double proline substitutions in the context of human IAPP. An S28P substitution significantly decreases amyloidogenicity and toxicity, while an S29P substitution has very modest effects despite being an identical replacement just one residue away. The consequences of the A25P substitution are between those of the two Ser to Pro substitutions. Double analogues containing an S28P replacement are less amyloidogenic and less toxic than the IAPPA25P S29P double analogue. Ion mobility mass spectrometry reveals that there is no correlation between the monomer or dimer conformation as reported by collision cross section measurements and the time to form amyloid. The work reveals both the plasticity of IAPP amyloid formation and the exquisite sequence sensitivity of IAPP amyloidogenicity and toxicity. The study highlights the key role of the S28P substitution and provides information that will aid in the rational design of soluble variants of IAPP. The variants studied here offer a system for further exploring features that control IAPP toxicity

Analysis of proline substitutions reveals the plasticity and sequence sensitivity of human IAPP amyloidogenicity and toxicity

Pancreatic amyloid formation by the polypeptide IAPP contributes to β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. There is a 1:1 correspondence between the ability of IAPP from different species to form amyloid in vitro and the susceptibility of the organism to develop diabetes. Rat IAPP is non-amyloidogenic and differs from human IAPP at six positions, including three proline replacements: A25P, S28P, and S29P. Incorporation of these proline residues into human IAPP leads to a non-amyloidogenic analogue that is used clinically. The role of the individual proline residues is not understood. We examine the three single and three double proline substitutions in the context of human IAPP. An S28P substitution significantly decreases amyloidogenicity and toxicity, while an S29P substitution has very modest effects despite being an identical replacement just one residue away. The consequences of the A25P substitution are between those of the two Ser to Pro substitutions. Double analogues containing an S28P replacement are less amyloidogenic and less toxic than the IAPPA25P S29P double analogue. Ion mobility mass spectrometry reveals that there is no correlation between the monomer or dimer conformation as reported by collision cross section measurements and the time to form amyloid. The work reveals both the plasticity of IAPP amyloid formation and the exquisite sequence sensitivity of IAPP amyloidogenicity and toxicity. The study highlights the key role of the S28P substitution and provides information that will aid in the rational design of soluble variants of IAPP. The variants studied here offer a system for further exploring features that control IAPP toxicity