Primary Care Physicians' Collection, Comfort, and Use of Race and Ethnicity in Clinical Practice in the United States

Purpose: The clinical utility of race and ethnicity has been debated. It is important to understand if and how race and ethnicity are communicated and collected in clinical settings. We investigated physicians' self-reported methods of collecting a patient's race and ethnicity in the clinical encounter, their comfort with collecting race and ethnicity, and associations with use of race in clinical decision-making. Methods: A national cross-sectional study of 787 clinically active general internists in the United States. Physicians' self-reported comfort with collecting patient race and ethnicity, their collection practices, and use of race in clinical care were assessed. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between comfort, collection practices, and use of race. Results: Most physicians asked patients to self-report their race or ethnicity (26.5%) on an intake form or collected this information directly from patients (26.2%). Most physicians were comfortable collecting patient race and ethnicity (84.3%). Physicians who were more comfortable collecting patient race and ethnicity (β=1.65; [95% confidence interval; CI 0.03–3.28]) or who directly collected patients' race and ethnicity (β=1.24 [95% CI 0.07–2.41]) were more likely to use race in clinical decision-making than physicians who were uncomfortable. Conclusions: This study documents variation in physician comfort level and practice patterns regarding patient race and ethnicity data collection. As the U.S. population becomes more diverse, future work should examine how physicians speak about race and ethnicity with patients and their use of race and ethnicity data impact patient–physician relationships, clinical decision-making, and patient outcomes

The psychosocial impact of leg ulcers in patients with sickle cell disease: I don’t want them to know my little secret

<div><p>Background</p><p>Sickle cell disease (SCD) impacts millions of individuals worldwide and more than 100,000 people in the United States. Leg ulcers are the most common cutaneous manifestation of SCD. The health status of individuals living with chronic leg ulcers is not only influenced by clinical manifestations such as pain duration and intensity, but also by psychosocial factors. Garnering insights into the psychosocial impact can provide a more holistic view of their influence on quality of life.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants living with active SCD-associated leg ulcers or with a history of ulcers. Subjects were recruited from an ongoing study (INSIGHTS, Clin Trial.Gov NCT02156102) and consented to this qualitative phase of the study. Five areas were explored: leg ulcer pain, physical function, social-isolation, social relationships and religious support. Data was collected from 20 individuals during these interviews and a thematic analysis was performed and reported.</p><p>Results</p><p>Twenty participants with a mean age of 42.4 (SD ± 11.1years) were included in the study. Major themes identified included:1) pain (acute and chronic); 2) compromised physical function as demonstrated by decreased ability to walk, run, and play sports; 3) social isolation from activities either by others or self-induced as a means of avoiding certain emotions, such as embarrassment; 4) social relationships (family support and social network); 5) support and comfort through their religion or spirituality.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>SCD patients with leg ulcers expressed that they experience social isolation, intense and frequent ulcer pain, and difficulty in physical function. SCD-associated leg ulcers have been studied from a clinical approach, but the psychosocial factors investigated in this study informs how quality of life is impacted by the leg ulcers.</p></div

Patient clinical and psychosocial characteristics.

<p>Patient clinical and psychosocial characteristics.</p

Splenic infarction in sickle cell trait: A comprehensive systematic review of case studies

Abstract Sickle cell trait (SCT), a commonly asymptomatic condition, has many associated clinical complications that upon presentation, can be very difficult to attribute to SCT. The effects of SCT on the spleen, for example, are not completely understood, though there have been a number of case reports detailing related complications in diverse populations. Our objective was to perform the first comprehensive case report review of splenic infarction in SCT patients to highlight the relevance of this seemingly rare condition. We conducted an extensive literature search reviewing case reports and case series of acute splenic infarctions from 1970 to 2020. This comprehensive search resulted in 54 articles with a total of 85 individuals. The ages ranged from 7 to 65, 12% were female. Individuals were of African‐American (26%), European (16%), South Asian (13%), Middle Eastern (7%), Latin American (7%), North or East African (4%), Mediterranean (4%), West African (1%), and unknown (22%) origins. Although splenic infarct in SCT patients has been associated with high altitudes, 39% of cases reporting altitude occurred below 3000 m. Among cases where HbS values were recorded, 88% occurred in individuals with HbS levels higher than 35%, suggesting that high HbS values may be a risk factor for splenic infarction. Our findings indicate that splenic infarct occurs across a wide range of demographic populations and environmental settings. While our understanding of SCT evolves, the findings here suggest that future advances in research and healthcare could benefit more from real‐time surveillance and registry initiation for various SCT outcomes such as splenic infarct

Patient social and demographic characteristics.

<p>Patient social and demographic characteristics.</p