31 research outputs found

    Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Human Intention Understanding in Temporo-Parietal Cortex: A Combined EEG/fMRI Repetition Suppression Paradigm

    Get PDF
    Inferring the intentions of other people from their actions recruits an inferior fronto-parietal action observation network as well as a putative social network that includes the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS). However, the functional dynamics within and among these networks remains unclear. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and high-density electroencephalogram (EEG), with a repetition suppression design, to assess the spatio-temporal dynamics of decoding intentions. Suppression of fMRI activity to the repetition of the same intention was observed in inferior frontal lobe, anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS), and right STS. EEG global field power was reduced with repeated intentions at an early (starting at 60 ms) and a later (∼330 ms) period after the onset of a hand-on-object encounter. Source localization during these two intervals involved right STS and aIPS regions highly consistent with RS effects observed with fMRI. These results reveal the dynamic involvement of temporal and parietal networks at multiple stages during the intention decoding and without a strict segregation of intention decoding between these networks

    “Biological Geometry Perception”: Visual Discrimination of Eccentricity Is Related to Individual Motor Preferences

    Get PDF
    In the continuum between a stroke and a circle including all possible ellipses, some eccentricities seem more “biologically preferred” than others by the motor system, probably because they imply less demanding coordination patterns. Based on the idea that biological motion perception relies on knowledge of the laws that govern the motor system, we investigated whether motorically preferential and non-preferential eccentricities are visually discriminated differently. In contrast with previous studies that were interested in the effect of kinematic/time features of movements on their visual perception, we focused on geometric/spatial features, and therefore used a static visual display.In a dual-task paradigm, participants visually discriminated 13 static ellipses of various eccentricities while performing a finger-thumb opposition sequence with either the dominant or the non-dominant hand. Our assumption was that because the movements used to trace ellipses are strongly lateralized, a motor task performed with the dominant hand should affect the simultaneous visual discrimination more strongly. We found that visual discrimination was not affected when the motor task was performed by the non-dominant hand. Conversely, it was impaired when the motor task was performed with the dominant hand, but only for the ellipses that we defined as preferred by the motor system, based on an assessment of individual preferences during an independent graphomotor task.Visual discrimination of ellipses depends on the state of the motor neural networks controlling the dominant hand, but only when their eccentricity is “biologically preferred”. Importantly, this effect emerges on the basis of a static display, suggesting that what we call “biological geometry”, i.e., geometric features resulting from preferential movements is relevant information for the visual processing of bidimensional shapes

    Excitability of the Primary Motor Cortex Increases More Strongly with Slow- than with Normal-Speed Presentation of Actions

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The aim of the present study was to investigate how the speed of observed action affects the excitability of the primary motor cortex (M1), as assessed by the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Copyright:Methods: Eighteen healthy subjects watched a video clip of a person catching a ball, played at three different speeds (normal-, half-, and quarter-speed). MEPs were induced by TMS when the model\u27s hand had opened to the widest extent just before catching the ball ("open") and when the model had just caught the ball ("catch"). These two events were locked to specific frames of the video clip ("phases"), rather than occurring at specific absolute times, so that they could easily be compared across different speeds. MEPs were recorded from the thenar (TH) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles of the right hand.Results: The MEP amplitudes were higher when the subjects watched the video clip at low speed than when they watched the clip at normal speed. A repeated-measures ANOVA, with the factor VIDEO-SPEED, showed significant main effects. Bonferroni\u27s post hoc test showed that the following MEP amplitude differences were significant: TH, normal vs. quarter; ADM, normal vs. half; and ADM, normal vs. quarter. Paired t-tests showed that the significant MEP amplitude differences between TMS phases under each speed condition were TH, "catch" higher than "open" at quarter speed; ADM, "catch" higher than "open" at half speed.Conclusions: These results indicate that the excitability of M1 was higher when the observed action was played at low speed. Our findings suggest that the action observation system became more active when the subjects observed the video clip at low speed, because the subjects could then recognize the elements of action and intention in others

    Cochlear structure and patterning is normal in <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup></i>;<i>Lrig2<sup>−/−</sup></i> double mutants but cochlear innervation is disrupted.

    No full text
    <p>(A–C) Cochlear tissue from adult animals was immunostained and then imaged as a flat-mount by confocal microscopy. In controls (A), neurofilament (NF)-positive neurites from both afferent and efferent neurons align in distinct radial bundles. Efferent projections also travel non-radially along the length of the cochlea in the inner spiral bundle (ISB) (bracket in A). The regular spacing normally found between these axonal bundles (A, arrowheads) is disrupted in <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup></i>;<i>Lrig2<sup>−/−</sup></i> double mutants (C, arrowheads). In addition, the ISB is reduced (brackets). Innervation was grossly normal in <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup>;Lrig2<sup>+/−</sup></i> animals. (D–F) Efferent axons and their terminals were visualized by staining for Choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) (D–F and D′–F′) and synaptophysin (Syp) (D″–F″). High power images of the boxed regions illustrate the obvious reduction in efferent innervation in double mutants (F′, F″) compared to controls (D′, D″). <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup>;Lrig2<sup>+/−</sup></i> animals showed an intermediate effect (E′, E″). ISB = inner spiral bundle, oC = organ of Corti, sg = spiral ganglion. See <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003824#pgen.1003824.s004" target="_blank">Figure S4</a> for images of additional genotypes. (A–F) Scale bar = 50 µm. (D′–F″) Scale bar = 10 µm.</p

    Paintfill analysis reveals inner ear morphological defects in <i>Lrig</i> mutants.

    No full text
    <p>Inner ear morphology was assessed blind to genotype in animals with all possible combinations of <i>Lrig1</i> and <i>Lrig3</i> mutant alleles. “n” corresponds to the total number of ears that were scored for each genotype. Columns indicate the number of ears of each genotype that showed defects in the lateral canal, posterior canal, or saccule/utricle, with the percent of total ears examined in parentheses. Novel phenotypes were observed only in <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup>;Lrig3<sup>−/−</sup></i> double mutant animals.</p

    Genotype distribution of <i>Lrig</i> mutant animals.

    No full text
    <p>Mice were generated from intercrosses between animals carrying <i>Lrig1</i> and <i>Lrig2</i> (top) or <i>Lrig1</i> and <i>Lrig3</i> mutant alleles (top). The number of mice carrying each genotype at postnatal day 7 (P7) and at 6 weeks is indicated, out of a total of 253 offspring from <i>Lrig1</i>;<i>Lrig2</i> intercrosses and 181 offspring from <i>Lrig1</i>;<i>Lrig3</i> intercrosses. For each genotype, the number of mice that is expected from this kind of intercross in indicated in parentheses. χ-squared tests confirmed that the observed distribution of genotypes is significantly different from the expected distribution.</p

    <i>Lrig1</i> but not <i>Lrig2</i> mutant mice exhibit decreased auditory sensitivity.

    No full text
    <p>Plots of threshold values from DPOAE recordings (A) and ABRs (B) performed on 6 week old animals. Auditory responses were tested at six frequencies (from low (5.6 kHz) to high (32 kHz)), and across a range of intensities (from sound pressure levels of 10 to 80 decibels (dB)). DPOAE and ABR thresholds in <i>Lrig2</i> mutant animals (solid blue line) were normal when compared to control animals (solid black line), even when additionally heterozygous for <i>Lrig1</i> (dashed blue line). In contrast, <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup></i> mutants (solid red line) showed a moderate increase in both DPOAE and ABR thresholds. This effect was even stronger in <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup>;Lrig2<sup>+/−</sup></i> mutant animals (dashed red line) and <i>Lrig1<sup>−/−</sup>;Lrig2<sup>−/−</sup></i> (solid orange line), which experienced a severe decrease in sensitivity across all frequencies. See <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003824#pgen.1003824.s005" target="_blank">Tables S1</a> and <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003824#pgen.1003824.s006" target="_blank">S2</a> for raw data and analysis of statistical significance.</p
    corecore