Long-term use of Everolimus in patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: final results from the EXIST-1 study

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) and other manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). However, long-term use of mTOR inhibitors might be necessary. This analysis explored long-term efficacy and safety of everolimus from the conclusion of the EXIST-1 study (NCT00789828). Methods and FINDINGS: EXIST-1 was an international, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial examining everolimus in patients with new or growing TSC-related SEGA. After a double-blind core phase, all remaining patients could receive everolimus in a long-term, open-label extension. Everolimus was initiated at a dose (4.5 mg/m 2 /day) titrated to a target blood trough of 5-15 ng/mL. SEGA response rate (primary end point) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving confirmed ≥50% reduction in the sum volume of target SEGA lesions from baseline in the absence of worsening nontarget SEGA lesions, new target SEGA lesions, and new or worsening hydrocephalus. Of 111 patients (median age, 9.5 years) who received ≥1 dose of everolimus (median duration, 47.1 months), 57.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.9-67.0) achieved SEGA response. Of 41 patients with target renal angiomyolipomas at baseline, 30 (73.2%) achieved renal angiomyolipoma response. In 105 patients with ≥1 skin lesion at baseline, skin lesion response rate was 58.1%. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable with that of previous reports, and occurrence of emergent AEs generally decreased over time. The most common AEs (≥30% incidence) suspected to be treatment-related were stomatitis (43.2%) and mouth ulceration (32.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus use led to sustained reduction in tumor volume, and new responses were observed for SEGA and renal angiomyolipoma from the blinded core phase of the study. These findings support the hypothesis that everolimus can safely reverse multisystem manifestations of TSC in a significant proportion of patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0078982

Long-Term Use of Everolimus in Patients with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Final Results from the EXIST-1 Study

Background: Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) and other manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). However, long-term use of mTOR inhibitors might be necessary. This analysis explored long-term efficacy and safety of everolimus from the conclusion of the EXIST-1 study (NCT00789828). Methods and Findings: EXIST-1 was an international, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial examining everolimus in patients with new or growing TSC-related SEGA. After a double-blind core phase, all remaining patients could receive everolimus in a long-term, open-label extension. Everolimus was initiated at a dose (4.5 mg/m2/day) titrated to a target blood trough of 5–15 ng/mL. SEGA response rate (primary end point) was defined as the proportion of patients achieving confirmed ≥50% reduction in the sum volume of target SEGA lesions from baseline in the absence of worsening nontarget SEGA lesions, new target SEGA lesions, and new or worsening hydrocephalus. Of 111 patients (median age, 9.5 years) who received ≥1 dose of everolimus (median duration, 47.1 months), 57.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.9–67.0) achieved SEGA response. Of 41 patients with target renal angiomyolipomas at baseline, 30 (73.2%) achieved renal angiomyolipoma response. In 105 patients with ≥1 skin lesion at baseline, skin lesion response rate was 58.1%. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) was comparable with that of previous reports, and occurrence of emergent AEs generally decreased over time. The most common AEs (≥30% incidence) suspected to be treatment-related were stomatitis (43.2%) and mouth ulceration (32.4%). Conclusions: Everolimus use led to sustained reduction in tumor volume, and new responses were observed for SEGA and renal angiomyolipoma from the blinded core phase of the study. These findings support the hypothesis that everolimus can safely reverse multisystem manifestations of TSC in a significant proportion of patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00789828</p

The STIMULUS Program: Clinical Trials Evaluating Sabatolimab (MBG453) Combination Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (HR-MDS) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Background: Therapy options for pts with HR-MDS or AML who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy (IC) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are limited, and clinical outcomes are poor. Novel, effective and tolerable therapies are urgently needed. TIM-3 is an inhibitory receptor that regulates both adaptive and innate immune responses. It is expressed on immune cells and on leukemic stem cells (LSCs) and blasts, but not on normal hematopoietic stem cells, making it a promising target in MDS and AML. Sabatolimab is a high-affinity, humanized, anti-TIM-3 IgG4 (S228P) antibody that simultaneously targets TIM-3 on immune and myeloid cells; this may restore immune function while also directly targeting LSCs and blasts. In preclinical studies, sabatolimab enhanced immune cell-mediated killing of AML cells in vitro. In early results from a ph 1b study (NCT03066648), sabatolimab + hypomethylating agents (HMAs; decitabine [Dec] or azacitidine [Aza]) demonstrated encouraging overall response rates in pts with high-/very high-risk MDS (+ Dec, 61%; + Aza, 57%) and newly diagnosed AML (+ Dec, 47%; + Aza, 29%), and a favorable safety profile. Study Design and Methods: The STIMULUS clinical trial program currently includes 3 trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of sabatolimab combination therapy in pts with HR-MDS or AML who are ineligible for IC or HSCT: STIMULUS-MDS1 (NCT03946670; ph 2) in pts with HR-MDS, STIMULUS-MDS2 (NCT04266301; ph 3) in pts with HR-MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-2 (CMML-2), and STIMULUS-AML1 (NCT04150029; ph 2) in pts with AML. STIMULUS-MDS1 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ph 2 study evaluating the addition of sabatolimab to HMA in pts with HR-MDS. The 2 primary endpoints are complete remission (CR) rate and/or progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), leukemia-free survival, duration of CR, transfusion independence, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity. Approximately 120 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive sabatolimab 400 mg or placebo IV Q2W (D8 and D22 of each 28-d cycle), + Dec 20 mg/m2 IV on D1-D5 or Aza 75 mg/m2 IV/SC on D1-D7, or D1-D5 + D8 and D9, of each 28-d cycle. STIMULUS-MDS2 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ph 3 study of sabatolimab in combination with Aza in pts with HR-MDS or CMML-2; the primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include measures related to pt quality of life, such as time to definitive deterioration of fatigue, improvement of fatigue, transfusion-free intervals, and physical/emotional functioning, as well as additional efficacy and safety parameters. Approximately 500 pts will be randomized 1:1 to sabatolimab 800 mg or placebo IV Q4W at D8 of each 28-d cycle + Aza using the same Aza dosing schedule as in STIMULUS-MDS1. Eligible pts for STIMULUS-MDS1 or -MDS2 are treatment-naïve adults with HR-MDS (Revised International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS-R] intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS). Pts with intermediate-risk MDS enrolling in STIMULUS-MDS1 are also required to have ≥5% bone marrow blasts at baseline. Pts with CMML-2 are eligible for STIMULUS-MDS2 only. STIMULUS-AML1 is a single-arm ph 2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of sabatolimab in combination with Aza and venetoclax in pts with AML who are not candidates for IC or HSCT. Primary endpoints are incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (safety run-in) and CR rate. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, CR/CRi rate, measurable residual disease-negative rate, durability of CR, relapse-free survival, EFS, OS, PK, transfusion independence, and immunogenicity. Eligible pts for STIMULUS-AML1 are adults with newly diagnosed AML who are not candidates for IC or HSCT, based on comorbidities (including renal and hepatic impairments, cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities), age (≥75 years old), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3. STIMULUS-AML1 will enroll approximately 86 pts. Part 1 consists of a safety run-in (≈18 pts) across 2 escalating sabatolimab dose levels (400/800 mg IV Q4W on D8 of each 28-d cycle) in combination with Aza (75 mg/m2 IV/SC on D1-D7, or D1-D5 + D8 and D9) and venetoclax 400 mg PO QD. If this triple combination is assessed to be safe, part 2 (expansion) will open and enroll approximately 68 additional pts who will receive sabatolimab 800 mg Q4W in combination with Aza and venetoclax. Disclosures Zeidan: Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CCITLA: Other; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aprea: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Giagounidis:AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AML Global Portal: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Yuhan: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy, Honoraria; BL&H: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Miyazaki:Novartis Pharma KK: Honoraria; NIPPON SHINYAKU CO.,LTD.: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Platzbecker:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Sekeres:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Malek:Novartis: Current Employment. Scott:Novartis: Current Employment. Niolat:Novartis: Current Employment. Peyrard:Novartis: Current Employment. Ma:Novartis: Current Employment. Kiertsman:Novartis: Current Employment. Stegert:Novartis AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hertle:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fenaux:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Santini:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria

Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Sequential First-Line Everolimus and Second-Line Sunitinib Versus First-Line Sunitinib and Second-Line Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Purpose A multicenter, randomized phase II trial, RECORD-3, was conducted to compare first-line everolimus followed by sunitinib at progression with the standard sequence of first-line sunitinib followed by everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Patients and Methods RECORD-3 used a crossover treatment design. The primary objective was to assess progression-free survival (PFS) noninferiority of first-line everolimus compared with first-line sunitinib. Secondary end points included combined PFS for each sequence, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Of 471 enrolled patients, 238 were randomly assigned to first-line everolimus followed by sunitinib, and 233 were randomly assigned to first-line sunitinib followed by everolimus. The primary end point was not met; the median PFS was 7.9 months for first-line everolimus and 10.7 months for first-line sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.8). Among patients who discontinued first-line, 108 (45%) crossed over from everolimus to second-line sunitinib, and 99 (43%) crossed over from sunitinib to second-line everolimus. The median combined PFS was 21.1 months for sequential everolimus then sunitinib and was 25.8 months for sequential sunitinib then everolimus (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.7). The median OS was 22.4 months for sequential everolimus and then sunitinib and 32.0 months for sequential sunitinib and then everolimus (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6). Common treatment-emergent adverse events during first-line everolimus or sunitinib were stomatitis (53% and 57%, respectively), fatigue (45% and 51%, respectively), and diarrhea (38% and 57%, respectively). Conclusion Everolimus did not demonstrate noninferiority compared with sunitinib as a first-line therapy. The trial results support the standard treatment paradigm of first-line sunitinib followed by everolimus at progression. </jats:sec

Patient Baseline Characteristics.

<p>Patient Baseline Characteristics.</p

Proportion of patients with ≥50% reduction/improvement in SEGA, renal angiomyolipoma, or skin lesions.

<p>* *Skin lesion response determined as partial or complete by Physician’s Global Assessment.</p

AEs by Preferred Term Regardless of Relationship to Study Drug and by Year of Emergence Occurring in ˃10% of Patients.

<p>AEs by Preferred Term Regardless of Relationship to Study Drug and by Year of Emergence Occurring in ˃10% of Patients.</p

CONSORT diagram.

<p>*Administrative problems defined as non-compliant with study visit or non-compliant with study drug.</p

Median percentage reduction in SEGA and renal angiomyolipoma volume over time.

<p>Median percentage reduction in SEGA and renal angiomyolipoma volume over time.</p