459 research outputs found

    Effect of walking distance on the change in ankle-brachial pressure index in patients with intermittent claudication

    Get PDF
    Objectives:The ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI) responses to different exercise intensities on a treadmill were evaluated to clarify the relationship between intermittent claudication and the haemodynamics in the leg.Patients and methods:Thirty patients with intermittent claudication (32 symptomatic legs) due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease were exercised on a treadmill to determine their pain-free walking distance, maximum walking distance (MWD) and recovery time. Each subject was exercised at 25% and 50% of the MWD to determine the effect of work intensity on the drop in ABPI, and the recovery time.Results:In the claudicating legs, 25% of the MWD resulted in almost the same reduction in ABPI as 50% of the MWD, and the MWD. In contrast, the ABPI in the asymptomatic legs (13) was significantly decreased in proportion to the walking distance. The recovery time increased linearly in both the groups, as the walking distance increased.Conclusion:The recovery time of the ABPI correlated well with the intensity of workload, while the drop in ABPI did not

    Flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines

    Get PDF
    Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for acute biliary inflammation/ infection (acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis), according to severity grade, have not yet been established in the world. Therefore we formulated flowcharts for the management of acute biliary inflammation/ infection in accordance with severity grade. For mild (grade I) acute cholangitis, medical treatment may be sufficient/appropriate. For moderate (grade II) acute cholangitis, early biliary drainage should be performed. For severe (grade III) acute cholangitis, appropriate organ support such as ventilatory/circulatory management is required. After hemodynamic stabilization is achieved, urgent endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage should be performed. For patients with acute cholangitis of any grade of severity, treatment for the underlying etiology, including endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical treatment should be performed after the patient's general condition has improved. For patients with mild (grade I) cholecystitis, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment. For patients with moderate (grade II) acute cholecystitis, early laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy is preferred. In patients with extensive local inflammation, elective cholecystectomy is recommended after initial management with percutaneous gallbladder drainage and/or cholecystostomy. For the patient with severe (grade III) acute cholecystitis, multiorgan support is a critical part of management. Biliary peritonitis due to perforation of the gallbladder is an indication for urgent cholecystectomy and/or drainage. Delayed elective cholecystectomy may be performed after initial treatment with gallbladder drainage and improvement of the patient's general medical condition. © Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2007.published_or_final_versio

    Background: Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis

    Get PDF
    There are no evidence-based-criteria for the diagnosis, severity assessment, of treatment of acute cholecysitis or acute cholangitis. For example, the full complement of symptoms and signs described as Charcot’s triad and as Reynolds’ pentad are infrequent and as such do not really assist the clinician with planning management strategies. In view of these factors, we launched a project to prepare evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis that will be useful in the clinical setting. This research has been funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, in cooperation with the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine, the Japan Biliary Association, and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. A working group, consisting of 46 experts in gastroenterology, surgery, internal medicine, emergency medicine, intensive care, and clinical epidemiology, analyzed and examined the literature on patients with cholangitis and cholecystitis in order to produce evidence-based guidelines. During the investigations we found that there was a lack of high-level evidence, for treatments, and the working group formulated the guidelines by obtaining consensus, based on evidence categorized by level, according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence of May 2001 (version 1). This work required more than 20 meetings to obtain a consensus on each item from the working group. Then four forums were held to permit examination of the Guideline details in Japan, both by an external assessment committee and by the working group participants (version 2). As we knew that the diagnosis and management of acute biliary infection may differ from country to country, we appointed a publication committee and held 12 meetings to prepare draft Guidelines in English (version 3). We then had several discussions on these draft guidelines with leading experts in the field throughout the world, via e-mail, leading to version 4. Finally, an International Consensus Meeting took place in Tokyo, on 1–2 April, 2006, to obtain international agreement on diagnostic criteria, severity assessment, and management

    Flowcharts for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas

    Get PDF
    No strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract carcinoma have been clearly described. We developed flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract carcinoma on the basis of the best clinical evidence. Risk factors for bile duct carcinoma are a dilated type of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A nondilated type of PBM is a risk factor for gallbladder carcinoma. Symptoms that may indicate biliary tract carcinoma are jaundice and pain in the upper right area of the abdomen. The first step of diagnosis is to carry out blood biochemistry tests and ultrasonography (US) of the abdomen. The second step of diagnosis is to find the local extension of the carcinoma by means of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Because resection is the only way to completely cure biliary tract carcinoma, the indications for resection are determined first. In patients with resectable disease, the indications for biliary drainage or portal vein embolization (PVE) are checked. In those with nonresectable disease, biliary stenting, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or best supportive care is selected

    Need for criteria for the diagnosis and severity assessment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines

    Get PDF
    The Tokyo Guidelines formulate clinical guidance for healthcare providers regarding the diagnosis, severity assessment, and treatment of acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis. The Guidelines were developed through a comprehensive literature search and selection of evidence. Recommendations were based on the strength and quality of evidence. Expert consensus opinion was used to enhance or formulate important areas where data were insufficient. A working group, composed of gastroenterologists and surgeons with expertise in biliary tract surgery, supplemented with physicians in critical care medicine, epidemiology, and laboratory medicine, was selected to formulate draft guidelines. Several other groups (including members of the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine, the Japan Biliary Association, and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery) have reviewed and revised the draft guidelines. To build a global consensus on the management of acute biliary infection, an international expert panel, representing experts in this area, was established. Between April 1 and 2, 2006, an International Consensus Meeting on acute biliary infections was held in Tokyo. A consensus was determined based on best available scientific evidence and discussion by the panel of experts. This report describes the highlights of the Tokyo International Consensus Meeting in 2006. Some important areas focused on at the meeting include proposals for internationally accepted diagnostic criteria and severity assessment for both clinical and research purposes

    Genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P4501A1 and oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in Taiwan

    Get PDF
    Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that genetic polymorphisms result in functionally significant changes in cytochrome p4501A1 (either CYP1A1 MspI or exon 7) but the few epidemiologic studies of these polymorphisms in oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma have been inconclusive. These inconclusive results motivated us to further examine the relationship between CYP1A1 MspI and exon 7 polymorphisms and risk of oesophageal cancer. In total, 146 cases of oesophageal squamous-cell-carcinoma and 324 control cases (a total of 470 cases) were genotyped from records at three Taiwan hospitals. No significant association was noted for the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism variable between carcinoma and control cases. In contrast, the frequency of Ile/Ile, Ile/Val, and Val/Val in exon 7 was 68 (46.6%), 62 (42.5%), and 16 (11.0%) in carcinoma cases and 179 (55.3%), 127 (39.2%), and 18 (5.6%) in control cases, respectively. After factoring out other potential contributing factors, patients with Val/Val showed a 2.48 (95% CT=1.15–5.34) greater risk of developing oesophageal cancer than those with Ile/Ile. A slightly (albeit not significantly) greater risk was identified in subjects with Ile/Val (OR=1.34; 95% CI=0.86–2.07). These findings suggest that an exon 7 polymorphism, not a MspI polymorphism, in CYP1A1 may be pivotal in the development of oesophageal cancer
    corecore