4 research outputs found

    Change of classification of lesions from DIR to PSIR (based on lesion type).

    No full text
    <p>[number (percentage)] Each row corresponds to a lesion type seen on DIR, and each column how the same lesion was classified on PSIR. E.g. of the IC lesions so classified on DIR, 60% remained so on PSIR.</p

    Change of classification of lesions from DIR to PSIR (based on morphology of lesions).

    No full text
    <p>[number (percentage)] Each row corresponds to a lesion type seen on DIR, and each column how the same lesion was classified on PSIR. E.g. of the IC lesions so classified on DIR, 60% remained so on PSIR.</p

    Acquisition parameters.

    No full text
    <p>FOV = field of view, TR = repetition time, TE = echo time, TI = inversion time, SENSE = sensitivity encoding factor.</p

    Corresponding DIR and PSIR images showing change of classification of CGM lesions.

    No full text
    <p>DIR LC lesions (blocked chevron) in panel A, appear as JC-WM lesions on PSIR in panel B; DIR LC lesion in panel C is seen to be a pure IC lesion on PSIR in panel D; DIR LC lesion (blocked chevron) and IC lesion (open chevron) in panel E appear as JC WM and LC on PSIR respectively, in panel F.</p
    corecore