Keratinocyte Binding Assay Identifies Anti-Desmosomal Pemphigus Antibodies Where Other Tests Are Negative

The serological diagnosis of pemphigus relies on the detection of IgG autoantibodies directed against the epithelial cell surface by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on monkey esophagus and against desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) and Dsg3 by ELISA. Although being highly sensitive and specific tools, discrepancies can occur. It is not uncommon that sera testing positive by ELISA give a negative result by IIF and vice versa. This brings diagnostic challenges wherein pemphigus has to be ascertained or ruled out, especially when no biopsy is available. We utilized the ability of anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 IgG to bind in specific desmosomal patterns to living cells to investigate these discrepancies between IIF and ELISA. Living cultured primary normal human keratinocytes were grown under differentiating conditions to induce adequate expression of Dsg1 and Dsg3, incubated with patient serum for 1 h, and then stained to visualize bound IgG. We investigated two different groups; sera from patients with a positive direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and inconsistent serological findings (n = 43) and sera with positive ELISA or IIF but with negative DIF (n = 60). As positive controls we used 50 sera from patients who fulfilled all diagnostics criteria, and 10 sera from normal human subjects served as negative controls. In the DIF positive group, IgG from 39 of the 43 sera bound to the cells in a desmosomal pattern while in the DIF negative group none of the 60 sera bound to the cells. This shows that for pemphigus patients, ELISA and IIF can be negative while anti-desmosomal antibodies are present and vice versa that ELISA and IIF can be positive in non-pemphigus cases. In absence of a biopsy for DIF, such findings may lead to misdiagnosis

Functional investigation of two simultaneous or separately segregating DSP variants within a single family support the theory of a dose-dependent disease severity

Desmoplakin (DP) is an important component of desmosomes, essential in cell-cell connecting structures in stress-bearing tissues. Over many hundreds of pathogenic variants in DSP have been associated with different cutaneous and cardiac phenotypes or a combination, known as a cardiocutaneous syndrome. Of less than 5% of the reported DSP variants, the effect on the protein has been investigated. Here, we describe and have performed RNA, protein and tissue analysis in a large family where DSPc.273+5G>A/c.6687delA segregated with palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK), woolly hair and lethal cardiomyopathy, while DSPWT/c.6687delA segregated with PPK and milder cardiomyopathy. hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes and primary keratinocytes from carriers were obtained for analysis. Unlike the previously reported nonsense variants in the last exon of DSP that bypassed the nonsense-mediated mRNA surveillance system leading to protein truncation, variant c.6687delA was shown to cause loss of protein expression. Patients carrying both variants and having a considerably more severe phenotype were shown to have 70% DP protein reduction, while patients carrying only c.6687delA had 50% protein reduction and a milder phenotype. Analysis of RNA from patient cells did not show any splicing effect of the c.273+5G>A variant. However, a minigene splicing assay clearly showed alternative spliced transcripts originating from this variant. This study shows the importance of RNA and protein analyses to pinpoint the exact effect of DSP variants instead of solely relying on predictions. In addition, the particular pattern of inheritance, with simultaneous or separately segregating DSP variants within the same family, strongly supports the theory of a dose-dependent disease severity

Natural Gene Therapy May Occur in All Patients with Generalized Non-Herlitz Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa with COL17A1 Mutations

Mutations in the type XVII collagen gene (COL17A1) result in the blistering disorder non-Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB-nH). The incidence of revertant mosaicism, also called "natural gene therapy", was identified in a cohort of 14 patients with JEB-nH caused by COL17A1 mutations in the Netherlands. Five different in vivo reversions, all correcting the germ-line COL17A1 mutation c.2237delG in exon 30, were found in four mosaic JEB-nH patients. The correcting DNA changes involved a wide variety of somatic mutations, from which an indel mutation (c.2228-101_2263 + 70delins15) and a large deletion of 2,165 base pairs (c.2227 + 153_2336-318del) have not been previously observed in patients with revertant mosaicism. Our results show that there is no preference for a repair mechanism. Moreover, revertant mosaicism was confirmed on a DNA level in 6 out of 10 generalized JEB-nH patients. Further, photo-material and clinical history of the other four generalized JEB-nH patients demonstrated that each patient has revertant skin patches. In contrast, revertant mosaicism was not detected in the four localized JEB-nH patients. The fact that so many, if not all, generalized JEB-nH COL17A1 patients have revertant patches offers opportunities for cell therapies in which the patient's own naturally corrected cells are used as a source

Natural Gene Therapy in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa

Background: Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a genetic blistering disorder caused by mutations in the type VII collagen gene, COL7A1. In revertant mosaicism, germline mutations are corrected by somatic events resulting in a mosaic disease distribution. This "natural gene therapy" phenomenon long has been recognized in other forms of epidermolysis bullosa but only recently in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Observations: We describe a 21-year-old man with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa carrying the homozygous c.6508C>T (p.Gln2170X) nonsense mutation who reported an unaffected skin patch on his neck where blisters never had occurred. Immunofluorescent type VII collagen staining was normal in 80% of the unaffected skin biopsy; however, it was strongly reduced in the affected skin. In the unaffected skin, the somatic nucleotide substitution c.6510G>T reverted line nonsense codon to tyrosine (p.Gln21.70Tyr), thereby restoring functional protein production. Conclusions: Revertant mosaicism is considered rare in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. However, it might be more common than previously anticipated because our patient is the third in whom revertant mosaicism was identified in a short period of time. The correction mechanism is different than that previously reported. Systematic examination of patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, therefore, will likely reveal more patients with revertant patches. This is important because the natural gene therapy phenomenon may provide opportunities for revertant cell therapy

table_1_Keratinocyte Binding Assay Identifies Anti-Desmosomal Pemphigus Antibodies Where Other Tests Are Negative.docx

<p>The serological diagnosis of pemphigus relies on the detection of IgG autoantibodies directed against the epithelial cell surface by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on monkey esophagus and against desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) and Dsg3 by ELISA. Although being highly sensitive and specific tools, discrepancies can occur. It is not uncommon that sera testing positive by ELISA give a negative result by IIF and vice versa. This brings diagnostic challenges wherein pemphigus has to be ascertained or ruled out, especially when no biopsy is available. We utilized the ability of anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 IgG to bind in specific desmosomal patterns to living cells to investigate these discrepancies between IIF and ELISA. Living cultured primary normal human keratinocytes were grown under differentiating conditions to induce adequate expression of Dsg1 and Dsg3, incubated with patient serum for 1 h, and then stained to visualize bound IgG. We investigated two different groups; sera from patients with a positive direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and inconsistent serological findings (n = 43) and sera with positive ELISA or IIF but with negative DIF (n = 60). As positive controls we used 50 sera from patients who fulfilled all diagnostics criteria, and 10 sera from normal human subjects served as negative controls. In the DIF positive group, IgG from 39 of the 43 sera bound to the cells in a desmosomal pattern while in the DIF negative group none of the 60 sera bound to the cells. This shows that for pemphigus patients, ELISA and IIF can be negative while anti-desmosomal antibodies are present and vice versa that ELISA and IIF can be positive in non-pemphigus cases. In absence of a biopsy for DIF, such findings may lead to misdiagnosis.</p

Table_3_Keratinocyte Binding Assay Identifies Anti-Desmosomal Pemphigus Antibodies Where Other Tests Are Negative.docx

<p>The serological diagnosis of pemphigus relies on the detection of IgG autoantibodies directed against the epithelial cell surface by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on monkey esophagus and against desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) and Dsg3 by ELISA. Although being highly sensitive and specific tools, discrepancies can occur. It is not uncommon that sera testing positive by ELISA give a negative result by IIF and vice versa. This brings diagnostic challenges wherein pemphigus has to be ascertained or ruled out, especially when no biopsy is available. We utilized the ability of anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 IgG to bind in specific desmosomal patterns to living cells to investigate these discrepancies between IIF and ELISA. Living cultured primary normal human keratinocytes were grown under differentiating conditions to induce adequate expression of Dsg1 and Dsg3, incubated with patient serum for 1 h, and then stained to visualize bound IgG. We investigated two different groups; sera from patients with a positive direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and inconsistent serological findings (n = 43) and sera with positive ELISA or IIF but with negative DIF (n = 60). As positive controls we used 50 sera from patients who fulfilled all diagnostics criteria, and 10 sera from normal human subjects served as negative controls. In the DIF positive group, IgG from 39 of the 43 sera bound to the cells in a desmosomal pattern while in the DIF negative group none of the 60 sera bound to the cells. This shows that for pemphigus patients, ELISA and IIF can be negative while anti-desmosomal antibodies are present and vice versa that ELISA and IIF can be positive in non-pemphigus cases. In absence of a biopsy for DIF, such findings may lead to misdiagnosis.</p

Table_2_Keratinocyte Binding Assay Identifies Anti-Desmosomal Pemphigus Antibodies Where Other Tests Are Negative.docx

<p>The serological diagnosis of pemphigus relies on the detection of IgG autoantibodies directed against the epithelial cell surface by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on monkey esophagus and against desmoglein 1 (Dsg1) and Dsg3 by ELISA. Although being highly sensitive and specific tools, discrepancies can occur. It is not uncommon that sera testing positive by ELISA give a negative result by IIF and vice versa. This brings diagnostic challenges wherein pemphigus has to be ascertained or ruled out, especially when no biopsy is available. We utilized the ability of anti-Dsg3 and anti-Dsg1 IgG to bind in specific desmosomal patterns to living cells to investigate these discrepancies between IIF and ELISA. Living cultured primary normal human keratinocytes were grown under differentiating conditions to induce adequate expression of Dsg1 and Dsg3, incubated with patient serum for 1 h, and then stained to visualize bound IgG. We investigated two different groups; sera from patients with a positive direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and inconsistent serological findings (n = 43) and sera with positive ELISA or IIF but with negative DIF (n = 60). As positive controls we used 50 sera from patients who fulfilled all diagnostics criteria, and 10 sera from normal human subjects served as negative controls. In the DIF positive group, IgG from 39 of the 43 sera bound to the cells in a desmosomal pattern while in the DIF negative group none of the 60 sera bound to the cells. This shows that for pemphigus patients, ELISA and IIF can be negative while anti-desmosomal antibodies are present and vice versa that ELISA and IIF can be positive in non-pemphigus cases. In absence of a biopsy for DIF, such findings may lead to misdiagnosis.</p

A PLEC Isoform Identified in Skin, Muscle, and Heart

Mutations in the PLEC gene cause basal epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) in 8% of cases (Bolling et al., 2014). PLEC encodes the ubiquitously present cytolinker protein plectin, which plays an important role in the hemidesmosome by connecting keratin filaments to the underlying integrin α6β4 subunit (Andra et al., 2003; Koster et al., 2003). Plectin deficiency in skin results in intraepidermal skin cleavage in basal keratinocytes (McLean et al., 1996). In humans, eight distinct plectin isoforms have been identified arising from tissue-specific translation