Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy — diagnosis, evolution and treatment

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most frequent neurologic complications experienced by patients receiving antineoplastic drugs. Involvement of the peripheral nerves may have an important impact on daily activi­ties and lead to severe impairment of the patient’s quality of life (QoL). It seems to be of crucial importance to make a correct and early diagnosis of polyneuropathy and, if possible, spare the patient unnecessary suffering or loss of function. In the preceding article we have presented epidemiology, grading and pathogenesis of the toxic CIPN. The purpose of this article is to review current knowledge of diagnostic techniques, prevention and management strategies in the context of CIPN.

A new approach to ticagrelor-based de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. A rationale for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated, multicenter clinical study

© 2021 Via Medica. This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/The risk of ischemic events gradually decreases after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), reaching a stable level after 1 month, while the risk of bleeding remains steady during the whole period of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). Several de-escalation strategies of antiplatelet treatment aiming to enhance safety of DAPT without depriving it of its efficacy have been evaluated so far. We hypothesized that reduction of the ticagrelor maintenance dose 1 month after ACS and its continuation until 12 months after ACS may improve adherence to antiplatelet treatment due to better tolerability compared with the standard dose of ticagrelor. Moreover, improved safety of treatment and preserved anti-ischemic benefit may also be expected with additional acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) withdrawal. To evaluate these hypotheses, we designed the Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Two Ticagrelor-based De-escalation Antiplatelet Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndrome — a randomized clinical trial (ELECTRA-SIRIO 2), to assess the influence of ticagrelor dose reduction with or without continuation of ASA versus DAPT with standard dose ticagrelor in reducing clinically relevant bleeding and main-taining anti-ischemic efficacy in ACS patients. The study was designed as a phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, investigator-initiated clinical study with a 12-month follow-up.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio

Long-term outcomes following drug-eluting balloons versus thin-strut drug-eluting stents for treatment of recurrent restenosis in drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with recurrent in-stent restenosis (R-ISR). AIMS: To compare the long-term outcomes of patients treated with either a thin-strut DES (thin-DES) or a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) for R-ISR in a drug-eluting stent (DES). METHODS: A multicenter DEB-DRAGON registry was used to retrospectively identify patients with R-ISR who received either a thin-DES or a DEB. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Primary outcome was target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Out of 311 patients (mean age 67 years, 63% male) with R-ISR, 86 (27.7%) were treated with a thin-DES and 225 (72.3%) with a DEB. Median follow-up was 2.6 years. TLR occurred in 18 (20.9%) of patients who received thin-DES and 61 (27.1%) patients treated with DEB (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33–0.98; log-rank P = 0.04). The difference remained significant in a propensity score-matched cohort of 57 patients treated with thin-DES and 57 patients treated with a DEB (17.5 vs. 33.3% respectively; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.86; P = 0.01). The risks of device oriented adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality were similar after thin-DES or DEB in both unadjusted and propensity score-matched cohorts. In a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model the treatment with a thin-DES was an independent predictor of a TLR-free survival (HR, 0.33; 95% CI 0.13–0.84; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with R-ISR implantation of a thin-DES is associated with lower risk of repeated revascularization compared with angioplasty with a DEB

Long-term outcomes following drug-eluting balloon or thin-strut drug-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis stratified by duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DEB-Dragon Registry)

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with drug-eluting stent restenosis (DES-ISR) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting balloons (DEB) or DES are not unambiguous. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between long-term outcomes and the length of DAPT in patients treated with PCI due to DES-ISR with DEB or DES. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, a total of 1,367 consecutive patients with DES-ISR, who underwent PCI with DEB or DES between 2008 and 2019 entered the study. The mean length of the follow-up was 1,298.7 ±794 days. We assessed study endpoints according to the duration of DAPT (≤ 3 vs. > 3 and ≤ 6 vs. > 6 months) before and after propensity score matching (PSM): stroke, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), target vessel revascularisation (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), death and device oriented composite endpoints (DOCE). Kaplan-Meier estimates were created to differentiate long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Pairwise contrast analysis considering type of PCI (DES vs. DEB) and duration of DAPT (≤ 6 vs. > 6 months) before PSM revealed superiority of DES + DAPT > 6 months vs. DEB + DAPT > 6 months for DOCE (p 6 months is related to a higher stroke rate (p = 0.01) when compared to ≤ 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with DAPT in patients with DES-ISR is related to better long-term outcomes in the case of PCI with DES than DEB. DAPT > 6 months is related to the greater rate of strokes, independently of the type of treatment (DES and DEB) than DAPT ≤ 6 months