Detection and localization of early- and late-stage cancers using platelet RNA

Cancer patients benefit from early tumor detection since treatment outcomes are more favorable for less advanced cancers. Platelets are involved in cancer progression and are considered a promising biosource for cancer detection, as they alter their RNA content upon local and systemic cues. We show that tumor-educated platelet (TEP) RNA-based blood tests enable the detection of 18 cancer types. With 99% specificity in asymptomatic controls, thromboSeq correctly detected the presence of cancer in two-thirds of 1,096 blood samples from stage I–IV cancer patients and in half of 352 stage I–III tumors. Symptomatic controls, including inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases, and benign tumors had increased false-positive test results with an average specificity of 78%. Moreover, thromboSeq determined the tumor site of origin in five different tumor types correctly in over 80% of the cancer patients. These results highlight the potential properties of TEP-derived RNA panels to supplement current approaches for blood-based cancer screening

A Serum Protein Classifier Identifying Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Derive Clinical Benefit from Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Purpose: Pretreatment selection of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who would derive clinical benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) would fulfill an unmet clinical need by reducing unnecessary toxicities from treatment and result in substantial health care savings. Experimental Design: In a retrospective study, mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic analysis was performed on pretreatment sera derived from patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab as part of routine clinical care (n ¼ 289). Machine learning combined spectral and clinical data to stratify patients into three groups with good (“sensitive”), intermediate, and poor (“resistant”) outcomes following treatment in the second-line setting. The test was applied to three independent patient cohorts and its biology was investigated using protein set enrichment analyses (PSEA). Results: A signature consisting of 274 MS features derived from a development set of 116 patients was associated wit

High PD-1 expression on regulatory and effector T-cells in lung cancer draining lymph nodes

The treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved clinical outcome for a proportion of patients. The current challenge is to find better biomarkers than PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) that will identify patients likely to benefit from this therapy. In this exploratory study we assessed the differences in T-cell subsets and PD-1 expression levels on T-cells in tumour-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). To evaluate this, flow cytometric analyses were performed on endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) fine-needle aspirates (FNA) from TDLNs of patients with NSCLC, and the results were compared to paired PBMC samples. For a select number of patients, we were also able to obtain cells from a non-TDLN (NTDLN) sample. Our data show that the frequency of PD-1+ CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, as well as the PD-1 expression level on activated regulatory T (aTreg) and CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, are higher in TDLNs than in PBMCs and, in a small sub-analysis, NTDLNs. These elevated PD-1 expression levels in TDLNs may reflect tumour-specific T-cell priming and conditioning, and may serve as a predictive or early-response biomarker during PD-1 checkpoint blockade

Effect of Pembrolizumab after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Alone on Tumor Response in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of the PEMBRO-RT Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance: Many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immunotherapy show primary resistance. High-dose radiotherapy can lead to increased tumor antigen release, improved antigen presentation, and T-cell infiltration. This radiotherapy may enhance the effects of checkpoint inhibition. Objective: To assess whether stereotactic body radiotherapy on a single tumor site preceding pembrolizumab treatment enhances tumor response in patients with metastatic NSCLC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized phase 2 study (PEMBRO-RT) of 92 patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled between July 1, 2015, and March 31, 2018, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Data analysis was of the intention-to-treat population. Interventions: Pembrolizumab (200 mg/kg every 3 weeks) either alone (control arm) or after radiotherapy (3 doses of 8 Gy) (experimental arm) to a single tumor site until confirmed radiographic progression, unacceptable toxic effects, investigator decision, patient withdrawal of consent, or a maximum of 24 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Improvement in overall response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks from 20% in the control arm to 50% in the experimental arm with P <.10. Results: Of the 92 patients enrolled, 76 were randomized to the control arm (n = 40) or the experimental arm (n = 36). Of those, the median age was 62 years (range, 35-78 years), and 44 (58%) were men. The ORR at 12 weeks was 18% in the control arm vs 36% in the experimental arm (P =.07). Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.7-6.9 months) vs 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.0-14.6 months) (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-1.18; P =.19), and median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.0-13.9 months) vs 15.9 months (95% CI, 7.1 months to not reached) (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.37-1.18; P =.16). Subgroup analyses showed the largest benefit from the addition of radiotherapy in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. No increase in treatment-related toxic effects was observed in the experimental arm. Conclusions and Relevance: Stereotactic body radiotherapy prior to pembrolizumab was well tolerated. Although a doubling of ORR was observed, the results did not meet the study's prespecified end point criteria for meaningful clinical benefit. Positive results were largely influenced by the PD-L1-negative subgroup, which had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival. These results suggest that a larger trial is necessary to determine whether radiotherapy may activate noninflamed NSCLC toward a more inflamed tumor microenvironment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02492568

Study of Zr-89-Pembrolizumab PET/CT in Patients With Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) proportion score is the current method for selecting non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for single-agent treatment with pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody. However, not all patients respond to therapy. Better understanding of in vivo drug behavior may help in the selection of patients who will benefit the most. Methods: NSCLC patients eligible for pembrolizumab mono-therapy as first- or later-line therapy were enrolled. Patients received 2 injections of 89Zr-pembrolizumab, 1 without a preceding dose of pembrolizumab and 1 with a preceding dose of 200 mg of pembrolizumab, directly before tracer injection. Up to 4 PET/CT scans were obtained after tracer injection. After imaging acquisition, patients were treated with 200 mg of pembrolizumab every 3 wk. Tumor uptake and tracer biodistribution were visually assessed and quantified as the SUV. Tumor tracer uptake was correlated with PD-1 and PD-L1 expression and response to pembrolizumab treatment. Results: Twelve NSCLC patients were included. One patient experienced grade 3 myalgia after tracer injection. 89Zr-pembrolizumab was observed in the blood pool, liver, and spleen. Tracer uptake was visualized in 47.2% of 72 tumor lesions measuring BXP20 mm in the long-axis diameter, and substantial uptake heterogeneity was observed within and between patients. Uptake was higher in patients with a response to pembrolizumab treatment (n 5 3) than in patients without a response (n 5 9), although this finding was not statistically significant (median SUVpeak, 11.4 vs. 5.7; P 5 0.066). No significant correlations were found with PD-L1 or PD-1 immunohistochemistry. Conclusion: 89Zr-pembrolizumab injection was safe, with only 1 grade 3 adverse event-possibly immune-related-in 12 patients. 89Zr-pembrolizumab tumor uptake was higher in patients with a response to pembrolizumab treatment but did not correlate with PD-L1 or PD-1 immunohistochemistry

PD-L1 PET/CT Imaging with Radiolabeled Durvalumab in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Better biomarkers are needed to predict treatment outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-programmed death- 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry has limited predictive value, possibly because of tumor heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression. Noninvasive PD-L1 imaging using 89Zr-durvalumab might better reflect tumor PD-L1 expression. Methods: NSCLC patients eligible for second-line immunotherapy were enrolled. Patients received 2 injections of 89Zr-durvalumab: one without a preceding dose of unlabeled durvalumab (tracer dose only) and one with a preceding dose of 750 mg of durvalumab, directly before tracer injection. Up to 4 PET/CT scans were obtained after tracer injection. After imaging acquisition, patients were treated with 750 mg of durvalumab every 2 wk. Tracer biodistribution and tumor uptake were visually assessed and quantified as SUV, and both imaging acquisitions were compared. Tumor tracer uptake was correlated with PD-L1 expression and clinical outcome, defined as response to durvalumab treatment. Results: Thirteen patients were included, and 10 completed all scheduled PET scans. No tracer-related adverse events were observed, and all patients started durvalumab treatment. Biodistribution analysis showed 89Zr-durvalumab accumulation in the blood pool, liver, and spleen. Serial imaging showed that image acquisition 120 h after injection delivered the best tumor-to-blood pool ratio. Most tumor lesions were visualized with the tracer dose only versus the coinjection imaging acquisition (25% vs. 13.5% of all lesions). Uptake heterogeneity was observed within (SUVpeak range, 0.2-15.1) and between patients. Tumor uptake was higher in patients with treatment response or stable disease than in patients with disease progression according to RECIST 1.1. However, this difference was not statistically significant (median SUVpeak, 4.9 vs. 2.4; P = 0.06). SUVpeak correlated better with the combined tumor and immune cell PD-L1 score than with PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, although neither was statistically significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.93, respectively). Conclusion: 89Zr-durvalumab was safe, without any tracer-related adverse events, and more tumor lesions were visualized using the tracer dose-only imaging acquisition. 89Zr-durvalumab tumor uptake was higher in patients with a response to durvalumab treatment but did not correlate with tumor PD-L1 immunohistochemistry

Whole body PD-L1 PET in patients with NSCLC and melanoma.

Background: PD-(L)1 immunotherapy is effective in multiple tumors, including NSCLC and melanoma, but tumor PD-L1 IHC correlates only moderately with treatment outcome. This study aims to assess 1) safety of 18F-BMS-986192 (18F-PD-L1) in human, 2) PD-L1 quantification in tumors using 18F-PD-L1 PET, 3) PD-L1 PET correlation with IHC and treatment outcome, and 4) intra and inter subject tracer uptake variability. Methods: Pts with NSCLC (N = 10) and melanoma (N = 3) were included. At baseline, pts received a static or multiphase dynamic whole body PET scan after injecting 200 MBq 18F-BMS-986192. For NSCLC pts, (1) SUV(max, peak and mean) were measured for each delineable tumor (N = 32, 1-7 tumors/pt), (2) PD-L1 IHC (28.8 assay) was performed on the biopsy, and (3) response to Nivolumab therapy assessed by RECIST 1.1. Intra and inter subject variability and intraclass correlation were calculated using SUVs of all assessed tumors. Equal variance for PD-L1 status was evaluated by a Levene’s test. Four (3 female) pts underwent dosimetry study (ICRP 60). Results: No AEs related to radiotracer was observed. Dosimetry study demonstrated whole body exposure of 30 mGy at dose > 1400 MBq. Biodistribution among pts is comparable. PD-L1 IHC from 13 biopsied lesions were evaluated, 5 <1%, 4 ≥1%, and 4 ≥50%. Tumor tracer uptake was measured in NSCLC pts and categorized by PDL-1 IHC as ≥50% or <50%. Clinical trial information: 2015-004760-11. Tumor SUVs did not correlate with RECIST 1.1 assessment. Lesion heterogeneity was reflected in both inter and intra pt variability (CVinter = 41%, CVintra = 53%, ICC = 0.41 for SUVpeak). Levene’s test showed no significance in variability between the two PD-L1 categories. Conclusions: PET-imaging with 18F-BMS-986192 is safe and feasible in pts with NSCLC and melanoma. Pts with higher PD-L1 PET SUV have higher PD-L1 by IHC. Intra pt variability is similar to inter pt variability. With limited number of pts, no clear correlation of PET PD-L1 and tumor response is observed. A prospective study with this tracer is underway to further investigate 18F-BMS-986192 in understanding of PD-L1 expression

Pembrolizumab with or without radiotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials

Background: Radiotherapy might augment systemic antitumoral responses to immunotherapy. In the PEMBRO-RT (phase 2) and MDACC (phase 1/2) trials, patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly allocated immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) with or without radiotherapy. When the trials were analysed individually, a potential benefit was noted in the combination treatment arm. However, owing to the small sample size of each trial, differences in response rates and outcomes were not statistically significant but remained clinically notable. We therefore did a pooled analysis to infer whether radiotherapy improves responses to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Methods: Inclusion criteria for the PEMBRO-RT and MDACC trials were patients (aged ≥18 years) with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and at least one unirradiated lesion to monitor for out-of-field response. In the PEMBRO-RT trial, patients had previously received chemotherapy, whereas in the MDACC trial, patients could be either previously treated or newly diagnosed. Patients in both trials were immunotherapy-naive. In the PEMBRO-RT trial, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) and stratified by smoking status (<10 vs ≥10 pack-years). In the MDACC trial, patients were entered into one of two cohorts based on radiotherapy schedule feasibility and randomly assigned (1:1). Because of the nature of the intervention in the combination treatment arm, blinding to radiotherapy was not feasible in either trial. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously (200 mg every 3 weeks) with or without radiotherapy in both trials. In the PEMBRO-RT trial, the first dose of pembrolizumab was given sequentially less than 1 week after the last dose of radiotherapy (24 Gy in three fractions), whereas in the MDACC trial, pembrolizumab was given concurrently with the first dose of radiotherapy (50 Gy in four fractions or 45 Gy in 15 fractions). Only unirradiated lesions were measured for response. The endpoints for this pooled analysis were best out-of-field (abscopal) response rate (ARR), best abscopal disease control rate (ACR), ARR at 12 weeks, ACR at 12 weeks, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The intention-to-treat populations from both trials were included in analyses. The PEMBRO-RT trial (NCT02492568) and the MDACC trial (NCT02444741) are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. Findings: Overall, 148 patients were included in the pooled analysis, 76 of whom had been assigned pembrolizumab and 72 who had been assigned pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy. Median follow-up for all patients was 33 months (IQR 32·4–33·6). 124 (84%) of 148 patients had non-squamous histological features and 111 (75%) had previously received chemotherapy. Baseline variables did not differ between treatment groups, including PD-L1 status and metastatic disease volume. The most frequently irradiated sites were lung metastases (28 of 72 [39%]), intrathoracic lymph nodes (15 of 72 [21%]), and lung primary disease (12 of 72 [17%]). Best ARR was 19·7% (15 of 76) with pembrolizumab versus 41·7% (30 of 72) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 2·96, 95% CI 1·42–6·20; p=0·0039), and best ACR was 43·4% (33 of 76) with pembrolizumab versus 65·3% (47 of 72) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (2·51, 1·28–4·91; p=0·0071). Median progression-free survival was 4·4 months (IQR 2·9–5·9) with pembrolizumab alone versus 9·0 months (6·8–11·2) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 95% CI 0·45–0·99; p=0·045), and median overall survival was 8·7 months (6·4–11·0) with pembrolizumab versus 19·2 months (14·6–23·8) with pembrolizumab plus radiotherapy (0·67, 0·54–0·84; p=0·0004). No new safety concerns were noted in the pooled analysis. Interpretation: Adding radiotherapy to pembrolizumab immunotherapy significantly increased responses and outcomes in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. These results warrant validation in a randomised phase 3 trial. Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme