36,423 research outputs found

    Hadronic form factors and the J/ψJ/\psi secondary production cross section: an update

    Full text link
    Improving previous calculations, we compute the D+Dˉ→J/ψ+πD + \bar{D} \to J/\psi + \pi cross section using the most complete effective lagrangians available. The new crucial ingredients are the form factors on the charm meson vertices, which are determined from QCD sum rules calculations. Some of them became available only very recently and the last one, needed for our present purpose, is calculated in this work.Comment: 12 pages, 9 eps figure

    Does the D−/D+D^-/D^+ production asymmetry decrease at large xFx_F?

    Get PDF
    We have applied the meson cloud model (MCM) to calculate the asymmetries in DD and DsD_s meson production in high energy Σ−\Sigma^--nucleus and π−\pi^--nucleus collisions. We find a good agreement with recent data. Our results suggest that the asymmetries may decrease at large xFx_F.Comment: revised version with new figures and added references to appear in Phys. Rev. Let

    Looking for meson molecules in B decays

    Get PDF
    We discuss the possibility of observing a loosely bound molecular state in a B three-body hadronic decay. In particular we use the QCD sum rule approach to study a η′−π\eta^\prime-\pi molecular current. We consider an isovector-scalar IGJPC=1− 0++I^G J^{PC}= 1^-~0^{++} molecular current and we use the two-point and three-point functions to study the mass and decay width of such state. We consider the contributions of condensates up to dimension six and we work at leading order in αs\alpha_s. We obtain a mass around 1.1 GeV, consistent with a loosely bound state, and a η′−π→K+K−\eta^\prime-\pi\rightarrow K^+ K^- decay width around 10 MeV.Comment: 7 pages, 8 figure

    Investigating the tetraquark structure of the new mesons

    Get PDF
    Using the QCD sum rule approach we investigate the possible four-quark structure of the recently observed mesons DsJ+(2317)D_{sJ}^{+}(2317), firstly observed by BaBaR, X(3872), firstly observed by BELLE and D0∗0(2308)D_0^{*0}(2308) observed by BELLE. We use diquark-antidiquark currents and work in full QCD, without relying on 1/mc1/m_c expansion. Our results indicate that a four-quark structure is acceptable for these mesons.Comment: 4 pages 1 eps figure, proceedings of the XVIII Workshop on Hadronic Interactions (RETINHA-18) Sao Paulo-S

    Fermionization, Number of Families

    Full text link
    We investigate bosonization/fermionization for free massless fermions being equivalent to free massless bosons with the purpose of checking and correcting the old rule by Aratyn and one of us (H.B.F.N.) for the number of boson species relative to the number of fermion species which is required to have bosonization possible. An important application of such a counting of degrees of freedom relation would be to invoke restrictions on the number of families that could be possible under the assumption, that all the fermions in nature are the result of fermionizing a system of boson species. Since a theory of fundamental fermions can be accused for not being properly local because of having anticommutativity at space like distances rather than commutation as is more physically reasonable to require, it is in fact called for to have all fermions arising from fermionization of bosons. To make a realistic scenario with the fermions all coming from fermionizing some bosons we should still have at least some not fermionized bosons and we are driven towards that being a gravitational field, that is not fermionized. Essentially we reach the spin-charge-families theory by one of us (N.S.M.B.) with the detail that the number of fermion components and therefore of families get determined from what possibilities for fermionization will finally turn out to exist. The spin-charge-family theory has long been plagued by predicting 4 families rather than the phenomenologically more favoured 3. Unfortunately we do not yet understand well enough the unphysical negative norm square components in the system of bosons that can fermionize in higher dimensions because we have no working high dimensional case of fermionization. But suspecting they involve gauge fields with complicated unphysical state systems the corrections from such states could putatively improve the family number prediction.Comment: 30 pages, H.B. Nielsen presented the talk at 20th20^{\rm{th}} Workshop "What Comes Beyond the Standard Models", Bled, 09-17 of July, 201
    • …
    corecore