Four different treatment strategies in aggressive fibromatosis:A systematic review

Background: The treatment approach for aggressive fibromatosis is changing. Although surgery is the mainstay in common practice, recent literature is reporting a more conservative approach. We compared the local control rate for surgery, surgery with radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone and a wait and see policy in a systematic review. Methods: A comprehensive search of the databases PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane, of the medical literature published in 1999 till March 2017 was performed by two reviewers, including articles about extra abdominal aggressive fibromatosis without the genetical variants. A total of 671 studies were assessed for eligibility, and 37 studies were included for analysis, representing 2780 patients. Results: The local control rates for surgery alone, surgery and radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone and observation were 75%, 78%, 85% and 78%, respectively. For patients with recurrent disease observation had a better local control rate than surgery alone (p = 0.001). In the observation group, stabilization of the tumor was seen in median 14 (range 12–35) months. The time to local recurrence in the treatment group was median 17 (range, 11–52) months. Conclusion: A watchful conservative first line approach with just observation and closely monitoring, by means of physical examination and MRI, appears to be justified in a subgroup of patients without clinical symptoms and no possible health hazards if the tumor would progress. Keywords: Aggressive fibromatosis, Different treatment strategies, Systematic revie

Four different treatment strategies in aggressive fibromatosis: A systematic review

Background: The treatment approach for aggressive fibromatosis is changing. Although surgery is the mainstay in common practice, recent literature is reporting a more conservative approach. We compared the local control rate for surgery, surgery with radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone and a wait and see policy in a systematic review. Methods: A comprehensive search of the databases PubMed/Medline, Embase and Cochrane, of the medical literature published in 1999 till March 2017 was performed by two reviewers, including articles about extra abdominal aggressive fibromatosis without the genetical variants. A total of 671 studies were assessed for eligibility, and 37 studies were included for analysis, representing 2780 patients. Results: The local control rates for surgery alone, surgery and radiotherapy, radiotherapy alone and observation were 75%, 78%, 85% and 78%, respectively. For patients with recurrent disease observation had a better local control rate than surgery alone (p = 0.001). In the observation group, stabilization of the tumor was seen in median 14 (range 12-35) months. The time to local recurrence in the treatment group was median 17 (range, 11-52) months. Conclusion: A watchful conservative first line approach with just observation and closely monitoring, by means of physical examination and MRI, appears to be justified in a subgroup of patients without clinical symptoms and no possible health hazards if the tumor would progress. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V

Factors Influencing the Use of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Netherlands

In the US, whether a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed depends on tumor and patient factors, including socioeconomic status (SES) and type of health care insurance. We analyzed which patient and tumor characteristics influenced the use of SLNB in a country where every patient has equal access to healthcare. Patients diagnosed with a cutaneous invasive melanoma of a parts per thousand yen1 mm between 2004 and 2011 and living in the northeastern part of the Netherlands were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Regression analysis was performed to assess the association of patient and tumor characteristics and SLNB use. SLNB was performed in 42 % of the 2,413 included patients. The frequency of performing SLNB increased between 2004 and 2011 from 24 to 55 % (p <0.001). Patients were less likely to undergo SLNB if they had a melanoma located in the head and neck area (p <0.001), when they were over 55 years (p = 0.001), and if they had a low SES (p = 0.03). SLNB use was more likely when the diagnosis of melanoma was made in the university hospital (p = 0.045) or when the Breslow thickness was 2.01-4.0 mm (p = 0.03). The use of SLNB has increased significantly between 2004 and 2011. However, in 2011 it was still performed in only 55 % of the Dutch patients with a melanoma a parts per thousand yen1 mm. In patients with head and neck melanoma, older patients, and patients with low SES, SLNB was less frequently performed. Patients with T3 melanomas and a diagnosis made in the university hospital more often had an SLNB performed