51 research outputs found

    Robinson's Squareroot-of-n-consistent Semiparametric Regression Estimator in Stata

    Get PDF
    This paper describes Robinson's (1988) double residual semiparametric regression estimator and Hardle and Mammen's (1993) specification test implementation in Stata. Some simple simulations illustrate how this newly coded estimator outperforms the already available semiparametric plreg command.Semipar; Semiparametric estimation

    The European Enlargement Process and Regional Convergence Revisited: Spatial Effects Still Matter.

    Get PDF
    This paper has two main goals. First, it reconsiders regional growth and convergence processes in the context of the enlargement of the European Union to new member states. We show that spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity still matter in a sample of 237 regions over the period 1993-2002. Spatial convergence clubs are defined using exploratory spatial data analysis and a spatial autoregressive model is estimated. We find strong evidence that the growth rate of per capita GDP for a given region is positively affected by the growth rate of neighbouring regions. The second objective is to test the robustness of the results with respect to non-normality, outliers and heteroskedasticity using two other methods: The quasi maximum Likelihood and the Bayesian estimation methods.

    Testing for Spatial Autocorrelation in a Fixed Effects Panel Data Model

    Get PDF
    This paper derives several Lagrange Multiplier statistics and the correspondinglikelihood ratio statistics to test for spatial autocorrelation in a fixed effectspanel data model. These tests allow discriminating between the two main typesof spatial autocorrelation which are relevant in empirical applications, namelyendogenous spatial lag versus spatially autocorrelated errors. In this paper, fivedifferent statistics are suggested. The first one, the joint test, detects the presenceof spatial autocorrelation whatever its type. Hence, it indicates whetherspecific econometric estimation methods should be implemented to account forthe spatial dimension. In case they need to be implemented, the other four testssupport the choice between the different specifications, i.e. endogenous spatiallag, spatially autocorrelated errors or both. The first two are simple hypothesistests as they detect one kind of spatial autocorrelation assuming the otherone is absent. The last two take into account the presence of one type of spatialautocorrelation when testing for the presence of the other one. We use themethodology developed in Lee and Yu (2008) to set up and estimate the generallikelihood function. Monte Carlo experiments show the good performance ofour tests. Finally, as an illustration, they are applied to the Feldstein-Horiokapuzzle. They indicate a misspecification of the investment-saving regressiondue to the omission of spatial autocorrelation. The traditional saving-retentioncoefficient is shown to be upward biased. In contrast our results favor capitalmobility.Testing ; Spatial ; Autocorrelation ; Fixed ; Effects ; Panel Data Model

    Estimating Nonlinearities in Spatial Autoregressive Models

    Get PDF
    In spatial autoregressive models, the functional form of autocorrelation is assumed to be linear. In this paper, we propose a simple semiparametric procedure, based on Yatchew's (1998) partial linear least squares, that relaxes this restriction. Simple simulations show that this model outperforms traditional SAR estimation when nonlinearities are present. We then apply the methodology on real data to test for the spatial pattern of voting for independent candidates in US presidential elections. We find that in some counties, votes for “third candidates” are non-linearly related to votes for “third candidates” in neighboring counties, which pleads for strategic behavior.Spatial econometrics; semiparametric estimations

    Interpreting dynamic space-time panel data models

    Get PDF
    22 pagesInternational audienceThere is a great deal of literature regarding the asymptotic properties of various approaches to estimating simultaneous space-time panel models, but little attention has been paid to how the model estimates should be interpreted. The motivation for use of space-time panel models is that they can provide us with information not available from cross-sectional spatial regressions. LeSage and Pace (2009) show that cross-sectional simultaneous spatial autoregressive models can be viewed as a limiting outcome of a dynamic space-time autoregressive process. A valuable aspect of dynamic space-time panel data models is that the own- and cross-partial derivatives that relate changes in the explanatory variables to those that arise in the dependent variable are explicit. This allows us to employ parameter estimates from these models to quantify dynamic responses over time and space as well as space-time diffusion impacts. We illustrate our approach using the demand for cigarettes over a 30 year period from 1963-1992, where the motivation for spatial dependence is a bootlegging effect where buyers of cigarettes near state borders purchase in neighboring states if there is a price advantage to doing so.La littérature économétrique récente fait une place croissante à l'étude des propriétés asymptotiques des différentes méthodes d'estimation des modèles de données de panel spatio-temporels. Toutefois, force est de constater que peu d'attention est consacrée à l'interprétation économique de tels modèles malgré leur grand intérêt pour la modélisation des phénomènes économiques dans une dimension spatio-temporelle et le rôle qu'ils pourraient jouer dans l'évaluation des politiques économiques dans cette même dimension. Nous montrons dans ce papier que les coefficients estimés de ces modèles permettent d'expliciter non seulement la dynamique temporelle des impacts mais également leur dynamique spatiale et surtout de quantifier la diffusion spatio-temporelle de l'impact d'une variation d'une variable explicative. La méthode proposée est illustrée par une étude de la demande de cigarettes dans 46 Etats américains sur la période 1963-1992 en utilisant une base de données bien connue dans la littérature économétrique. La présence d'autocorrélation spatiale est ici motivée par un effet de " contrebande ". Les consommateurs proches des frontières d'un état achèteront en effet leurs cigarettes dans les états voisins si le prix des cigarettes y est inférieur à celui pratiqué dans leur propre Etat

    Essays in spatial autoregressive panel data models

    No full text
    The purpose of this dissertation is to improve the applied researcher's toolbox to estimate spatial autoregressive panel data models. The first chapter of the dissertation derives impacts of a change in explanatory variables on the dependent variable in a spatio-temporal specification. An empirical application based on cigarettes sales illustrates the use of these impacts and their interpretation. The second chapter derives specification tests to assess the relevance of spatial autocorrelation in a fixed effects panel data model and provides an empirical application of the developed tests devoted to the Feldstein-Horioka (FH) paradox. It is shown that the traditional FH model is misspecified due to the omission of spatial autocorrelation in the specification. Accounting for spatial autocorrelation reduces the paradox. The third chapter extends the Mundlak approach to spatial Durbin panel data models to allow consistent estimation of spatial panel data models by random effects. The approach consists in correcting for the possible correlation existing between regressors and individual effects. The proposed method is applied on the determinants of house prices among Belgian municipalities. Finally, spatial autoregressive models traditionally assume the linearity of spatial autocorrelation, meaning that one only has to estimate one spatial autoregressive parameter. The fourth chapter of the dissertation explorates the possibility of nonlinear spatial autocorrelation and suggests an application on the US presidential election in 2000.(DOCSESG00) -- FUNDP, 201
    corecore