10 research outputs found

    Central Solenoid Insert Technical Specification

    Get PDF
    The US ITER Project Office (USIPO) is responsible for the ITER central solenoid (CS) contribution to the ITER project. The Central Solenoid Insert (CSI) project will allow ITER validation the appropriate lengths of the conductors to be used in the full-scale CS coils under relevant conditions. The ITER Program plans to build and test a CSI to verify the performance of the CS conductor. The CSI is a one-layer solenoid with an inner diameter of 1.48 m and a height of 4.45 m between electric terminal ends. The coil weight with the terminals is approximately 820 kg without insulation. The major goal of the CSI is to measure the temperature margin of the CS under the ITER direct current (DC) operating conditions, including determining sensitivity to load cycles. Performance of the joints, ramp rate sensitivity, and stability against thermal or electromagnetic disturbances, electrical insulation, losses, and instrumentation are addressed separately and therefore are not major goals in this project. However, losses and joint performance will be tested during the CSI testing campaign. The USIPO will build the CSI that will be tested at the Central Solenoid Model Coil (CSMC) Test Facility at the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Naka, Japan. The industrial vendors (the Suppliers) will report to the USIPO (the Company). All approvals to proceed will be issued by the Company, which in some cases, as specified in this document, will also require the approval of the ITER Organization. Responsibilities and obligations will be covered by respective contracts between the USIPO, called Company interchangeably, and the industrial Prime Contractors, called Suppliers. Different stages of work may be performed by more than one Prime Contractor, as described in this specification. Technical requirements of the contract between the Company and the Prime Contractor will be covered by the Fabrication Specifications developed by the Prime Contractor based on this document and approved by the Company and ITER. The Fabrication Specifications may reflect some national requirements and regulations that are not fully provided here. This document presents the ITER CSI specifications

    Testing Short Samples of ITER Conductors and Projection of Their Performance in ITER Magnets Testing short samples of ITER conductors and projection of their performance in ITER magnets

    No full text
    Abstract Qualification of the ITER conductor is absolutely necessary. Testing large scale conductors is expensive and time consuming. To test straight 3-4m long samples in a bore of a split solenoid is a relatively economical way in comparison with fabrication of a coil to be tested in a bore of a background field solenoid. However, testing short sample may give ambiguous results due to different constraints in current redistribution in the cable or other end effects which are not present in the large magnet. This paper discusses processes taking place in the ITER conductor, conditions when conductor performance could be distorted and possible signal processing to deduce behaviour of ITER conductors in ITER magnets from the test data. Introduction It was known from the very beginning of the CICC (Cable-in-Conduit Conductor) development that the performance of the large conductor is not always equivalent to the sum of the performances of the strands which it is comprised of. Testing of the short samples became a very important R&D activity to verify and qualify performance of large CICC in general and of ITER conductors in particular. Two facilities were built in the world in the late 80-s to test short samples of the CICC up to the fields of 11.5-13 T with the high field region of 0.3-0.45 m. One facility was FENIX, at LLNL, USA, which ceased operations in 1994. Another facility, SULTAN at PSI, Switzerland is the only facility still in operation for full scale ITER short conductors tests. Although testing at SULTAN gives very valuable results about performance of the conductor, there are some features in the experimental set up and sample preparation that make interpretation of the test results difficult and ambiguous. The SULTAN samples are about 3.5 m long and the magnetic field area is about 0.4 m long, which is marginal for ITER conductors. The short length of the magnetic field has two major concerns for projecting of the SULTAN test results to the conductor performance in a large magnet. First, the voltage generating length in the SULTAN is short in comparison with the one in the ITER magnet, which limits the total voltage available for making the current distribution uniform In recent tests [2], the ITER conductor samples showed growth of the voltage from the very start of current charging. Such behaviour is inconsistent with a superconducting transition and needs to be explained by other mechanisms. It requires strong assumptions to make interpretations and projections to the behaviour of the conductor in ITER magnets. This type of behaviour was observed in few cases before in previous tests, but that observation did not draw much attention then, since the criterion was typically set at 100 ”V/m or even at a quench current. The current sharing temperature T cs definition for ITER conductor qualification are set at a lowe

    Development of the Butt Joint for the ITER Central Solenoid

    No full text

    Interface Control Document for the Interface between the Central Solenoid Insert Coil and the Test Facility

    No full text
    This document provides the interface definition and interface control between the Central Solenoid Insert Coil and the Central Solenoid Model Coil Test Facility in Japan

    Fabrication of the First US ITER TF Conductor Sample for Qualification in SULTAN Facility

    No full text
    A pair of 3.5 m long ITER TF size straight conductors has been fabricated into a conductor short sample and submitted to the SULTAN facility at CRPP for cold test. The sample used a triplet-based cabling pattern in one leg and a septuplet-based in the other. The legs had different cabling pattern and strand diameters, but the same void fraction. To assure the accuracy in measurement of the conductor current sharing temperature, it is important to have uniform current distribution in the cable, which requires uniformly low interstrand resistivity in the joint. In the present sample, the cable/subcable wraps and the chrome plating on all strands were removed from the cable in the termination, followed by compacting and heat treating the termination in a Glidcop sleeve. To improve current transfer, the sintered termination was further filled with soft solder before it was soldered to the copper profile. To clarify the effectiveness of short sample instrumentation, the sample was equipped with enhanced number of sensors and with sensor mounts penetrating the conductor jacket for the thermometers and voltage taps positioned in the high field zone. This paper presents the experiences in sample fabrication and instrumentation, and outlines the parameters used in the key processes.Unites States ITE

    Qualification of the U.S. Conductors for ITER TF Magnet System

    No full text
    corecore