171 research outputs found

    <b>Paradoxically protective effect of glucocorticoids on bone mass and fragility fracture in a large cohort: a cross-sectional</b> <b>study</b>.

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesGlucocorticoids (GCs) increase the risk of fracture through reduction in BMD; they may also reduce bone quality, but recent supporting data are scarce. We aimed to confirm these effects in a large population-based cohort.MethodsWe used data from patients referred for first hip and lumbar spine BMD estimation by the sole DXA scanner in the north-west of England between June 2004 and September 2016. We compared the history of fractures and BMD between patients currently on GCs and patients never exposed to GC. A logistic model adjusted for possible confounders.ResultsMore than 20 000 subjects were included, 82% female, with mean age 63 (s.d. 13) years; 19% were currently on GCs. The patients on GCs were more often male, with higher BMI, but their age was similar to those not exposed to GC. Surprisingly, patients receiving GCs had ∼2% higher BMD at both sites (P vs 34%; P ConclusionIn this large population-based cohort, current GC use compared with never use was associated with higher bone mass and fewer rather than more fractures after adjusting for confounders. These results might be subject to unmeasured confounding, but for now they do not lend support to a detrimental effect of GCs on bone

    The risk of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with biologic agents : BSRBR-AS and meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    Funding: The BSRBR-AS is supported by the British Society for Rheumatology and they have received funds for the registry from Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB. These companies have no input in determining the topics for analysis or work involved in undertaking it but do receive an advance copy of the manuscript on which they may make comments. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: The original idea for the study was suggested by John Mansfield and discussed with Lesley Kay (both Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust). All authors discussed and contributed to designing this study and the analysis plan, which was undertaken by RLB and (updated and) overseen by OR, LED and GJM. Results were reviewed by all authors. GJM, RLB, OR and LED all contributed to drafting the manuscript which was critically reviewed by all authors. RLB undertook this work while a visiting student based at the University of Aberdeen from Ludwig-Maximilians Universität (Munich).Peer reviewedPostprin

    Depression and anxiety symptoms at TNF inhibitor initiation are associated with impaired treatment response in axial spondyloarthritis

    Get PDF
    Acknowledgment We are grateful to Professor Gary Macfarlane for commenting on the manuscript. We are grateful to the staff of the BSRBR-AS register and to the recruiting staff at the clinical centres, details of which are available at: www.abdn.ac.uk/bsrbr-as. We also thank Dr Lewis Carpenter for suggesting splines for modelling time. Contribution: SSZ analysed the data and wrote the manuscript with significant input from all co- authors. GTJ is the Deputy Chief Investigator on BSRBR-AS and designed the study and oversaw its conduct. In the current project they discussed results and provided input into drafts of the manuscript. Funding: The BSRBR-AS is funded by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) who have received funding for this from Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB. These companies receive advance copies of manuscripts for comments. They have no input in determining the topics for analysis or work involved in undertaking it.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

    Comorbidity and response to TNF inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis : longitudinal analysis of the BSRBR-AS

    Get PDF
    Acknowledgements: Funding: The BSRBR-AS is funded by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) who have received funding for this from Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB. These companies receive advance copies of manuscripts for comments. They have no input in determining the topics for analysis or work involved in undertaking it. Disclosures: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Contribution: SSZ analysed the data and wrote the manuscript, with significant input from all coauthors. GJM and GTJ are Chief Investigator and Deputy Chief Investigator respectively on BSRBR-AS and designed the study and oversaw its conduct. In the current project they discussed results and provided input into drafts of the manuscript. Data availability: Data from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Ankylosing Spondylitis are available to external investigators, on reasonable request. For information on how to access data, see: http://www.rheumatology.org.uk. We are grateful to the staff of the BSRBR-AS register and to the recruiting staff at the clinical centres, details of which are available at: www.abdn.ac.uk/bsrbr-asPeer reviewedPublisher PD

    Association between comorbidities and disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis : results from the BSRBR-AS

    Get PDF
    Funding: The BSRBR-AS is funded by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) who have received funding for this from Pfizer, AbbVie and UCB. These companies receive advance copies of manuscripts for comments. They have no input in determining the topics for analysis or work involved in undertaking it. We are grateful to the staff of the BSRBR-AS register and to the recruiting staff at the clinical centres, details of which are available at: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/bsrbr-as S.S.Z. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript, with significant input from all co-authors. G.J.M. and G.T.J. are Chief Investigator and Deputy Chief Investigator, respectively, on BSRBR-AS and designed the study and oversaw its conduct. In the current project they discussed results and provided input into drafts of the manuscript. Disclosure statement: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

    Comorbidity burden in axial spondyloarthritis: a cluster analysis

    Get PDF
    Objectives To examine how comorbidities cluster in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and whether these clusters are associated with quality of life, global health and other outcome measures. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients meeting ASAS criteria for axSpA in Liverpool, UK. Outcome measures included quality of life (EQ5D), global health and disease activity (BASDAI). We used hierarchical cluster analysis to group patients according to 38 pre-specified comorbidities. In multivariable linear models, the associations between distinct comorbidity clusters and each outcome measure were compared, using axSpA patients with no comorbidities as the reference group. Analyses were adjusted for age, gender, symptom duration, BMI, deprivation, NSAID-use and smoking. Results We studied 419 patients (69% male, mean age 46 years). 255 patients (61%) had at least one comorbidity, among whom the median number was 1 (range 1–6). Common comorbidities were hypertension (19%) and depression (16%). Of 15 clusters identified, the most prevalent clusters were hypertension-coronary heart disease and depression-anxiety. Compared with patients with no comorbidities, the fibromyalgia-irritable bowel syndrome cluster was associated with adverse patient-reported outcome measures; these patients reported 1.5-unit poorer global health (95%CI 0.01, 2.9), reduced quality of life (0.25-unit lower EQ5D; 95%CI −0.37, −0.12) and 1.8-unit higher BASDAI (95% CI 0.4, 3.3). Similar effect estimates were found for patients in the depression-anxiety cluster. Conclusion Comorbidity is common among axSpA patients. The two most common comorbidities were hypertension and depression. Patients in the depression-anxiety and fibromyalgia-IBS clusters reported poorer health and increased axSpA severity
    corecore