31 research outputs found

    Higgs boson decay into a lepton pair and a photon revisited

    Get PDF

    Higgs portal to dark matter and B→K(∗)B\rightarrow K^{(*)} decays

    Get PDF
    We consider a Higgs portal model in which the 125-GeV Higgs boson mixes with a light singlet mediator h2_{2} coupling to particles of a Dark Sector and study potential b→sh2_{2} decays in the Belle II experiment. Multiplying the gauge-dependent off-shell Standard-Model b-s-Higgs vertex with the sine of the Higgs mixing angle does not give the correct b-s-h2_{2} vertex. We clarify this issue by calculating the b-s-hZahl_{Zahl} vertex in an arbitrary Rξ_{ξ} gauge and demonstrate how the ξ dependence cancels from physical decay rates involving an on-shell or off-shell h2_{2}. Then we revisit the b→sh2_{2} phenomenology and point out that a simultaneous study of B→K∗h2_{2} and B→Kh2_{2} helps to discriminate between the Higgs portal and alternative models of the Dark Sector. We further advocate for the use of the h2_{2} lifetime information contained in displaced-vertex data with h2_{2} decaying back to Standard-Model particles to better constrain the h2_{2} mass or to reveal additional h2_{2} decay modes into long-lived particles

    Higgs portal to dark matter and B→K(∗)B\to K^{(*)} decays

    Full text link
    We consider a Higgs portal model in which the 125-GeV Higgs boson mixes with a light singlet mediator h2h_2 coupling to particles of a Dark Sector and study potential b→sh2b\to s h_2 decays in the Belle II experiment. Multiplying the gauge-dependent off-shell Standard-Model bb-ss-Higgs vertex with the sine of the Higgs mixing angle does not give the correct bb-ss-h2h_2 vertex. We clarify this issue by calculating the bb-ss-h2h_2 vertex in an arbitrary RξR_\xi gauge and demonstrate how the ξ\xi dependence cancels from physical decay rates involving an on-shell or off-shell h2h_2. Then we revisit the b→sh2b\to s h_2 phenomenology and point out that a simultaneous study of B→K∗h2B\to K^* h_2 and B→Kh2B\to K h_2 helps to discriminate between the Higgs portal and alternative models of the Dark Sector. We further advocate for the use of the h2h_2 lifetime information contained in displaced-vertex data with h2h_2 decaying back to Standard-Model particles to better constrain the h2h_2 mass or to reveal additional h2h_2 decay modes into long-lived particles.Comment: 9 pages, 4 figures. v.2: minor clarifications, added Table 1, added references, acknowledgements extende

    Flavorful leptoquarks at the LHC and beyond: Spin 1

    Get PDF
    Evidence for electron-muon universality violation that has been revealed in b→sℓℓb\to s \ell\ell transitions in the observables RK,K∗R_{K,K^*} by the LHCb Collaboration can be explained with spin-1 leptoquarks in SU(2)LSU(2)_L singlet V1V_1 or triplet V3V_3 representations in the O(1−10){\cal{O}}(1-10) TeV range. We explore the sensitivity of the high luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) and future proton-proton colliders to V1V_1 and V3V_3 in the parameter space connected to RK,K∗R_{K,K^*}-data. We consider pair production and single production in association with muons in different flavor benchmarks. Reinterpreting a recent ATLAS search for scalar leptoquarks decaying to bμb \mu and jμj \mu, we extract improved limits for the leptoquark masses: For gauge boson-type leptoquarks (κ=1\kappa=1) we obtain MV1>1.9M_{V_1}> 1.9 TeV, MV1>1.9M_{V_1}> 1.9 TeV, and MV1>1.7M_{V_1}> 1.7 TeV for leptoquarks decaying predominantly according to hierarchical, flipped and democratic quark flavor structure, respectively. Future sensitivity projections based on extrapolations of existing ATLAS and CMS searches are worked out. We find that for κ=1\kappa=1 the mass reach for pair (single) production of V1V_1 can be up to 3 TeV (2.1 TeV) at the HL-LHC and up to 15 TeV (19.9 TeV) at the FCC-hh with s=100\sqrt{s}=100 TeV and 20 \, \mbox{ab}^{-1}. The mass limits and reach for the triplet V3V_3 are similar or higher, depending on flavor. While there is the exciting possibility that leptoquarks addressing the RK,K∗R_{K,K^*}-anomalies are observed at the LHC, to fully cover the parameter space pppp-collisions beyond the LHC-energies are needed.Comment: 16 pages, 8 figures; v2: Clarifying comments, four plots and few references added. Few typos corrected. Conclusions unchange

    Higgs boson decay into a lepton pair and a photon: A roadmap to the discovery of H →zγ and probes of new physics

    Get PDF
    The decay H→ℓ+^{+}ℓ–^{–}γ, ℓ=e, μ receives contributions from H→Z[→ℓ+^{+}ℓ–^{–}]γ and a nonresonant contribution, both of which are loop induced. We describe how one can separate these subprocesses in a gauge-independent way, define the decay rate Γ(H→Zγ), and extract the latter from differential H→ℓ+^{+}ℓ–^{–}γ branching ratios. For ℓ=μ, also the tree decay rate, which is driven by the muon Yukawa coupling, is important. We propose kinematic cuts optimized to separate the three contributions, paving the way to the milestone (i) discovery of H→Zγ, (ii) discovery of H→μ+^{+}μ–^{–}γ| tree_{tree}, and (iii) quantification of new physics in both the effective H−Z−γ and nonresonant H−ℓ+^{+}ℓ–^{–}−γ couplings

    Addendum to "Impact of polarization observables and Bc→τνB_c\to \tau \nu on new physics explanations of the b→cτνb\to c \tau \nu anomaly"

    Get PDF
    In this addendum to arXiv:1811.09603 we update our results including the recent measurement of R(D){\cal R}(D) and R(D∗){\cal R}(D^*) by the Belle collaboration: R(D)Belle=0.307±0.037±0.016{\cal R}(D)_{\rm Belle} = 0.307\pm0.037\pm0.016 and R(D∗)Belle=0.283±0.018±0.014{\cal R}(D^*)_{\rm Belle}=0.283\pm0.018\pm0.014, resulting in the new HFLAV fit result R(D)=0.340±0.027±0.013{\cal R}(D) = {0.340\pm0.027 \pm 0.013}, R(D∗)=0.295±0.011±0.008{\cal R}(D^*) = {0.295\pm0.011 \pm 0.008 }, exhibiting a 3.1 σ3.1\,\sigma tension with the Standard Model. We present the new fit results and update all figures, including the relevant new collider constraints. The updated prediction for R(Λc){\cal R}(\Lambda_c) from our sum rule reads R(Λc)=RSM(Λc)(1.15±0.04)=0.38±0.01±0.01{\cal R}(\Lambda_c)= \mathcal{R}_{\rm SM}(\Lambda_c) \left( 1.15 \pm 0.04 \right) = 0.38 \pm 0.01 \pm 0.01. We also comment on theoretical predictions for the fragmentation function fcf_c of b→Bcb\to B_c and their implication on the constraint from Bu/c→τνB_{u/c}\to\tau\nu data.Comment: 9 pages, 7 figures. v2: references added, matches PRD versio

    Revisiting lifetimes of doubly charmed baryons

    Full text link
    We present updated predictions for lifetimes of doubly charmed baryons, within the heavy quark expansion, including available NLO αs\alpha_s contributions and newly-computed terms in the 1/mc1/m_c series. Our improved results confirm the expected hierarchy τ(Ξcc+)<τ(Ωcc+)<τ(Ξcc++) ,\tau(\Xi_{cc}^{+}) < \tau(\Omega_{cc}^{+}) < \tau(\Xi_{cc}^{++}) \,, while the predicted lifetime τ(Ξcc++)=0.32±0.5−0.7+0.8 ps\tau(\Xi_{cc}^{++}) = 0.32 \pm 0.5 ^{+0.8}_{-0.7} \,\textrm{ps} is consistent with the recent LHCb determination. We provide predictions for the lifetime ratios of the Ξcc+\Xi_{cc}^{+} and Ωcc+\Omega_{cc}^+ baryons relative to the Ξcc++\Xi_{cc}^{++} baryon, namely τ(Ξcc+)/τ(Ξcc++)=0.22±0.05±0.04\tau(\Xi_{cc}^{+})/\tau(\Xi_{cc}^{++})=0.22\pm 0.05\pm 0.04 and τ(Ωcc+)/τ(Ξcc++)=0.52±0.13−0.02+0.03\tau(\Omega_{cc}^{+})/\tau(\Xi_{cc}^{++})=0.52\pm 0.13^{+0.03}_{-0.02}.Comment: 25 pages, 2 figures; v2: few clarifications added, one reference added, matches version accepted for publicatio

    Impact of polarization observables and Bc→τν B_c\to \tau \nu on new physics explanations of the b→cτνb\to c \tau \nu anomaly

    Get PDF
    The combined analysis of the BaBar, Belle, and LHCb data on B→DτνB\to D\tau\nu, B→D∗τνB\to D^*\tau\nu and Bc→J/ΨτνB_c\to J/\Psi\tau\nu decay observables shows evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model (SM). In this article, we study all the one- and two-dimensional scenarios which can be generated by adding a single new particle to the SM. We put special emphasis on the model-discriminating power of FL(D∗)F_L(D^*) and of the τ\tau polarizations, and especially on the constraint from the branching fraction BR(Bc→τν){\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu). We critically review this constraint and do not support the aggressive limit of BR(Bc→τν)<10%{\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu)<10\% used in some analyses. While the impact of FL(D∗)F_L(D^*) is currently still limited, the BR(Bc→τν){\rm BR}(B_c\to\tau\nu) constraint has a significant impact: depending on whether one uses a limit of 60%60\%, 30%30\% or 10%10\%, the pull for new physics (NP) in scalar operators changes drastically. More specifically, for a conservative 60%60\% limit a scenario with scalar operators gives the best fit to data, while for an aggressive 10%10\% limit this scenario is strongly disfavored and the best fit is obtained in a scenario in which only a left-handed vector operator is generated. We find a sum rule for the branching ratios of B→DτνB\to D\tau\nu, B→D∗τνB\to D^*\tau\nu and Λb→Λcτν\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\tau\nu which holds for any NP contribution to the Wilson coefficients. This sum rule entails an enhancement of BR(Λb→Λcτν){\rm BR}(\Lambda_b\to \Lambda_c\tau\nu) over its SM prediction by (24±6)%(24\pm 6)\% for the current R(D(∗))\mathcal{R}(D^{(*)}) data.Comment: 16 pages, 6 figures; v2: clarifying comments and few references added, matches version published in PRD; v3: typo corrected in eq. (28). Updated results based on the HFLAV average for spring 2019 are available in arXiv:1905.0825
    corecore