Implementation of World Health Organization Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) Guidelines for the Assessment of Pneumonia in the Under 5s in Rural Malawi

<div><p>The Cooking and Pneumonia Study (CAPS) is a pragmatic cluster-level randomized controlled trial of the effect of an advanced cookstove intervention on pneumonia in children under the age of 5 years (under 5s) in Malawi (<a href="http://www.capstudy.org/" target="_blank">www.capstudy.org</a>). The primary outcome of the trial is the incidence of pneumonia during a two-year follow-up period, as diagnosed by healthcare providers who are using the World Health Organization (WHO) integrated management of childhood illnesses (IMCI) pneumonia assessment protocol and who are blinded to the trial arms. We evaluated the quality of pneumonia assessment in under 5s in this setting via a cross-sectional study of provider-patient encounters at nine outpatient clinics located within the catchment area of 150 village-level clusters enrolled in the trial across the two study locations of Chikhwawa and Karonga, Malawi, between May and June 2015 using the IMCI guidelines as a benchmark. Data were collected using a key equipment checklist, an IMCI pneumonia knowledge test, and a clinical evaluation checklist. The median number of key equipment items available was 6 (range 4 to 7) out of a possible 7. The median score on the IMCI pneumonia knowledge test among 23 clinicians was 75% (range 60% to 89%). Among a total of 176 consultations performed by 15 clinicians, a median of 9 (range 3 to 13) out of 13 clinical evaluation tasks were performed. Overall, the clinicians were adequately equipped for the assessment of sick children, had good knowledge of the IMCI guidelines, and conducted largely thorough clinical evaluations. We recommend the simple pragmatic approach to quality assurance described herein for similar studies conducted in challenging research settings.</p></div

PRISMA flowchart.

BackgroundHIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to prioritize limited programmatic resources. This review was undertaken to inform World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 HIV testing guidelines and assessed the research question, “Which demand creation strategies are effective for enhancing uptake of HTS?” focused on populations globally.Methods and findingsThe following electronic databases were searched through September 28, 2021: PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and Global Health Database; we searched IAS and AIDS conferences. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any demand creation intervention (incentives, mobilization, counseling, tailoring, and digital interventions) to either a control or other demand creation intervention and reported HTS uptake. We pooled trials to evaluate categories of demand creation interventions using random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed study quality with Cochrane’s risk of bias 1 tool. This study was funded by the WHO and registered in Prospero with ID CRD42022296947.We screened 10,583 records and 507 conference abstracts, reviewed 952 full texts, and included 124 RCTs for data extraction. The majority of studies were from the African (N = 53) and Americas (N = 54) regions. We found that mobilization (relative risk [RR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.30, 3.09], p p N = 4 RCTs), couple-oriented counseling (RR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.02, 3.86], p p N = 4 RCTs), peer-led interventions (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [1.15, 2.15], p p N = 10 RCTs), motivation-oriented counseling (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.07, 2.20], p p N = 4 RCTs), short message service (SMS) (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.09, 2.16], p p N = 5 RCTs), and conditional fixed value incentives (RR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.21, 1.91], p p N = 11 RCTs) all significantly and importantly (≥50% relative increase) increased HTS uptake and had medium risk of bias.Lottery-based incentives and audio-based interventions less importantly (25% to 49% increase) but not significantly increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Personal invitation letters and personalized message content significantly but not importantly (ConclusionsMobilization, couple- and motivation-oriented counseling, peer-led interventions, conditional fixed value incentives, and SMS are high-impact demand creation interventions and should be prioritized for programmatic consideration. Reduced duration counseling and video-based interventions are an efficient and effective alternative to address staffing shortages. Investment in demand creation activities should prioritize those with undiagnosed HIV or ongoing HIV exposure. Selection of demand creation interventions must consider risks and benefits, context-specific factors, feasibility and sustainability, country ownership, and universal health coverage across disease areas.</div

Summary of effect sizes of pooled estimates of uptake from meta-analysis.

Pooled RR effect sizes ranged from near 1.0 (indicating no improvement in uptake of HTS) through nearly 7.0 (indicating a large effect size); not important improvements (RR p p > 0.05). CI, confidence interval; HTS, HIV testing service; RR, relative risk; SMS, short message service; vs., versus.</p

Geographic distribution of included trials.

Key and bar chart identify the total number of trials included from each country on the map. The rworldmap [cran.r-project.org] package in R was used to obtain the publicly available map (South A (2011). “rworldmap: A New R package for Mapping Global Data.” The R Journal, 3(1), 35–43. ISSN 2073-4859); the base layer map file can be found: https://code.google.com/archive/p/rworld/source/default/source. (DOCX)</p

Funnel plots and Egger’s tests to assess publication bias.

Funnel plots and Egger’s tests to assess publication bias.</p

Meta-analysis plots of HTS uptake in relative and absolute differences.

Panels (A–O) 1: INCENTIVES: (A) conditional fixed value incentives, (B) lottery-based incentives, 2: MOBILIZATION: (C) mobilization, 3: TAILORED or TARGETED: (D) peer-led interventions, (E) personalized messages, (F) personal invitation letters, 4: MESSAGES & COUNSELING: (G) HIV-specific information and counseling, (H) HIV-specific information with economic empowerment, (I) couples counseling, (J) motivation-oriented counseling, (K) reduced duration counseling, 5: DIGITIZATION: (L) video-based vs text, (M) video-based vs. in-person, (N) audio information, (O) SMS. CI, confidence interval; CRCT, cluster-randomized trial; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RD: risk difference; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; RR, relative risk; SMS, short message service; SOC, standard of care.</p

RCTs evaluating different demand creation mechanisms.

RCTs evaluating different demand creation mechanisms.</p

Meta-analysis methods.

BackgroundHIV testing services (HTS) are the first steps in reaching the UNAIDS 95-95-95 goals to achieve and maintain low HIV incidence. Evaluating the effectiveness of different demand creation interventions to increase uptake of efficient and effective HTS is useful to prioritize limited programmatic resources. This review was undertaken to inform World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 HIV testing guidelines and assessed the research question, “Which demand creation strategies are effective for enhancing uptake of HTS?” focused on populations globally.Methods and findingsThe following electronic databases were searched through September 28, 2021: PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, EMBASE, and Global Health Database; we searched IAS and AIDS conferences. We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any demand creation intervention (incentives, mobilization, counseling, tailoring, and digital interventions) to either a control or other demand creation intervention and reported HTS uptake. We pooled trials to evaluate categories of demand creation interventions using random-effects models for meta-analysis and assessed study quality with Cochrane’s risk of bias 1 tool. This study was funded by the WHO and registered in Prospero with ID CRD42022296947.We screened 10,583 records and 507 conference abstracts, reviewed 952 full texts, and included 124 RCTs for data extraction. The majority of studies were from the African (N = 53) and Americas (N = 54) regions. We found that mobilization (relative risk [RR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.30, 3.09], p p N = 4 RCTs), couple-oriented counseling (RR: 1.98, 95% CI [1.02, 3.86], p p N = 4 RCTs), peer-led interventions (RR: 1.57, 95% CI [1.15, 2.15], p p N = 10 RCTs), motivation-oriented counseling (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.07, 2.20], p p N = 4 RCTs), short message service (SMS) (RR: 1.53, 95% CI [1.09, 2.16], p p N = 5 RCTs), and conditional fixed value incentives (RR: 1.52, 95% CI [1.21, 1.91], p p N = 11 RCTs) all significantly and importantly (≥50% relative increase) increased HTS uptake and had medium risk of bias.Lottery-based incentives and audio-based interventions less importantly (25% to 49% increase) but not significantly increased HTS uptake (medium risk of bias). Personal invitation letters and personalized message content significantly but not importantly (ConclusionsMobilization, couple- and motivation-oriented counseling, peer-led interventions, conditional fixed value incentives, and SMS are high-impact demand creation interventions and should be prioritized for programmatic consideration. Reduced duration counseling and video-based interventions are an efficient and effective alternative to address staffing shortages. Investment in demand creation activities should prioritize those with undiagnosed HIV or ongoing HIV exposure. Selection of demand creation interventions must consider risks and benefits, context-specific factors, feasibility and sustainability, country ownership, and universal health coverage across disease areas.</div

Subgroup analyses for meta-analyses with high statistical heterogeneity.

Subgroup analyses for meta-analyses with high statistical heterogeneity.</p

Trim-and-fill adjusted estimates of uptake and yield.

Trim-and-fill adjusted estimates of uptake and yield.</p