What are we measuring? Comparison of household food security indicators in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

The development of national food security information systems is constrained by a lack of guidance on which indicators to use. This paper compares food security indicators across two seasons (summer and winter) in one of the most deprived areas of the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. The results show that only anthropometric indicators are sensitive enough to differentiate levels of food insecurity. The lack of consistent classification across indicators means that surveys must use a combination of food consumption and experience of hunger measures backed up by anthropometric measures. Targeting interventions is difficult if the measures cannot be relied on. Further investigation is needed to identify a suite of appropriate indicators for a national information and surveillance system.South African Water Research Commission (WRC Project No. Project K5/2172/4), the South African National Research Foundation (Grant numbers CPR20110706000020, 77053 and 80529), the University of Pretoria’s Institutional Research Theme on Food, Nutrition and Well-being, and the University of Pretoria’s Post-Doctoral Fellowship Programme.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gefn202017-09-30hb2016Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Developmen

Considerations for the design of nutrition-sensitive production programmes in rural South Africa

BACKGROUND: Very little has been researched about the efficacy, effectiveness, feasibility, sustainability and impact of food-based approaches on the diets and nutritional status of populations at risk of hunger and food insecurity. This study contributes knowledge about the impact of food-based approaches on the diets of populations at risk of hunger and food insecurity in four of the poorest rural communities in South Africa. The study investigated the consumption and production patterns of rural households (278 in summer and 280 in winter) in four sites in the poorest municipalities in South Africa. METHODS: A multistage stratified random sampling technique was applied to identify the communities and sample households for the quantitative survey and qualitative assessments. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected between 2013 and 2015 through focus group discussions (FGDs), key informant interviews and the two-round panel survey to cover both the summer and winter seasons at each site. RESULTS: Home gardening led to a significant positive increase in the consumption of white roots and tubers, dark green leafy vegetables, orange-coloured fruit and other fruit in the 24 h prior to the survey. Participation in a community garden led to significant increases in the consumption of dark green leafy vegetables and other vegetables. School gardening did not demonstrate any statistical relationships with the consumption of foods from the crop-related food groups. Crop production improved dietary diversity. Selling produce and irrigation showed a stronger improvement in dietary diversity. Seasonality affected the availability of fresh fruit and vegetables for home consumption in winter. CONCLUSIONS: Producing beyond that solely for home consumption has greater benefits for dietary diversity and a consumption-smoothing effect during the post-harvest period. Politicians and the scientific community should recognise the role that household and small-scale crop production plays in supporting household consumption and the provision of essential micronutrients despite constraints and disincentives. Production and education programmes should focus on strengthening existing good consumption patterns and promoting the consumption of foods that can improve dietary diversity.South African Water Research Commission (WRC) and University of Pretoria’s Institutional Research.http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcpublichealthpm2020Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural DevelopmentConsumer ScienceHuman NutritionPlant Production and Soil Scienc

What are we measuring? Comparison of household food security indicators in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

The development of national food security information systems is constrained by a lack of guidance on which indicators to use. This paper compares food security indicators across two seasons (summer and winter) in one of the most deprived areas of the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. The results show that only anthropometric indicators are sensitive enough to differentiate levels of food insecurity. The lack of consistent classification across indicators means that surveys must use a combination of food consumption and experience of hunger measures backed up by anthropometric measures. Targeting interventions is difficult if the measures cannot be relied on. Further investigation is needed to identify a suite of appropriate indicators for a national information and surveillance system.South African Water Research Commission (WRC Project No. Project K5/2172/4), the South African National Research Foundation (Grant numbers CPR20110706000020, 77053 and 80529), the University of Pretoria’s Institutional Research Theme on Food, Nutrition and Well-being, and the University of Pretoria’s Post-Doctoral Fellowship Programme.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/gefn202017-09-30hb2016Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Developmen