14 research outputs found
Safety and short term outcomes of a new truly minimally-invasive mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse apical repair
Objective To evaluate the safety and short term outcomes of a new, truly
minimally-invasive, mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic
floor apical repair. Methods A prospective study was conducted using the
NeuGuide™ device system for pelvic floor apical repair. The primary
effectiveness outcome was centro-apical pelvic floor prolapse by POP-Q after
six months. The primary safety outcome was intra-operative, immediate (first
48 h) post-operative complications and adverse effects after six months. A
standardized questionnaire (UDI-6) to assess quality of life at entry and
during follow-up visits was used. Patients’ six months-follow-up and
evaluation are reported. Results The mean age of the study population (n=10)
was 63.8±12.0 years. All patients had a previous prolapse surgery. Five had a
previous hysterectomy and two had stress urinary incontinence symptoms. During
surgery six patients had a concurrent colporrhaphy. There was no injury to the
bladder, rectum, pudendal nerves, or major pelvic vessels and no febrile
morbidity was recorded. At six months, no cases of centro-apical recurrence
were noted. Patients were satisfied with the procedure and had favorable
quality of life scores. Using the UDI-6 questionnaire an improvement, in all
domains was seen. Moreover, although the sample size was small, the
improvement in urge and overflow incontinence related domains were
demonstrated to be statistically significant. Conclusions This new NeuGuide™
device allows rapid and safe introduction of a suspending suture through the
sacrospinous ligament and makes sacrospinous ligament fixation easy to
perform, while avoiding dissection and mesh complications
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE AFRICAN PLASMODIUM FALCIPARUM DATABASE – (afriPFdb)
The detailed investigation of mantle structure from the dispersion of surface
waves is a young but vigorous field of study. Observations have been accumulating
rapidly in the past few years because of the wide-spread installation of
long-period instruments. Modern methods of data analysis used in conjunction
with high-speed digital computers have made it possible to determine dispersion
with greater precision and over a broader spectrum than has previously been
possible. Observations now extend out to the fundamental periods of free
oscillations of the whole earth. Interpretation has lagged behind observation
because of the difficulties inherent in the problem of dispersion over realistic
models of a spherical earth. This problem is now well in hand and dispersion
appropriate to the standard earth models suggested by earlier body waves
studies has been calculated. Even with digital computers, however, the computations
are so formidable that until recently only the most tentative efforts have
been made to modify the standard earth structures to give a more satisfactory
fit to the data. A review as recent as the one by Bolt in the preceding volume of
this series was, of necessity, limited to a discussion of the various standard earth
models with no attempt made to use the full power of surface waves as an independent
technique. Recent developments have made detailed surface wave
interpretations possible and new information, rather than generalized verification
of old information, should be rapidly forthcoming. Project Mohole and
the International Upper Mantle Project have focused the attention of many
earth scientists on the upper mantle. Because of this renewed emphasis present
information and speculation on the properties of the mantle based on a variety
of sources is summarized and re-examined in some detail. This provides the
guide-lines for potentially fruitful further research and points out the nature of
some of the discrepancies and limitations in our present knowledge that may be
resolved by the surface wave method
Outcomes of a fixed skeletonised mini mesh implant for pelvic organ prolapse repair with uterine preservation
Mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is complicated, causing erosions, postoperative pain and surgical failure. We hypothesised that reducing the mesh size and fixating it would result in significant cure rates and reduce complication rates. Here, we present the effectiveness of mini mesh implants in POP reconstruction. Sixty women who underwent repair of stage III and IV apical prolapse with cystocele or rectocele using skeletonised mesh implant Seratom PA MR MN® were evaluated. Anatomical outcomes were assessed using modified POP-quantification (POP-Q) staging and functional outcomes were self-reported by patients – one and three months post-operatively. Apical support with anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy was performed, resulting in 96.6% success rate. Follow-up conducted one and three months post-operatively revealed significant improvement on the modified POP-Q (p < .001) and no complaints of dyspareunia. Para-vesicular fixation using a skeletonised mini mesh implant is feasible and effective in POP repair and has low surgical complication risk.Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is currently under scrutiny as it may result in erosions, postoperative pain, and surgical failure. What do the results of this study add? The use of an apical support with mini-mesh implants resulted in a 96.6% (58/60) success rate and excellent outcomes at 1- and 3-month follow-up. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Reconstruction using skeletonised and fixated mini-mesh implants may be safe and effective for POP treatment
The “Pelvic Harness”: a skeletonized mesh implant for safe pelvic floor reconstruction
ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, safety and surgical results of skeletonized mesh implants to form a pelvic harness for pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. Study design Patients with advanced pelvic floor prolapse were enrolled to this study. Study model was a kit mesh, reduced to 75% of the original surface area by cutting out mesh material from the central mesh body. Patients were evaluated at the end of the 1st and 6th post-operative months and interviewed at the study conclusion. Results Ninety-five women with advanced pelvic floor prolapse had this implant. Mean follow-up duration was 9 months (6-12 months). The POP-Q point’s measurements showed marked and statistically significant improvements. Bladder over-activity symptoms, fecal incontinence, pelvic pain and constipation rates were all reduced as well. No adverse effects related to the dissection or mesh implantation were marked. The first and sixth post-operative month follow-up records as well as the study conclusion interview findings were satisfactory in terms of subjective and objective cure and adverse effects occurrence. Conclusion This study data proposes that skeletonizing meshes might be safely and successfully implanted for potentially improved pelvic floor reconstruction
Safety and short term outcomes of a new truly minimally-invasive mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic organ prolapse apical repair
ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the safety and short term outcomes of a new, truly minimally-invasive, mesh-less and dissection-less anchoring system for pelvic floor apical repair. Methods A prospective study was conducted using the NeuGuide™ device system for pelvic floor apical repair. The primary effectiveness outcome was centro-apical pelvic floor prolapse by POP-Q after six months. The primary safety outcome was intra-operative, immediate (first 48 h) post-operative complications and adverse effects after six months. A standardized questionnaire (UDI-6) to assess quality of life at entry and during follow-up visits was used. Patients’ six months-follow-up and evaluation are reported. Results The mean age of the study population (n=10) was 63.8±12.0 years. All patients had a previous prolapse surgery. Five had a previous hysterectomy and two had stress urinary incontinence symptoms. During surgery six patients had a concurrent colporrhaphy. There was no injury to the bladder, rectum, pudendal nerves, or major pelvic vessels and no febrile morbidity was recorded. At six months, no cases of centro-apical recurrence were noted. Patients were satisfied with the procedure and had favorable quality of life scores. Using the UDI-6 questionnaire an improvement, in all domains was seen. Moreover, although the sample size was small, the improvement in urge and overflow incontinence related domains were demonstrated to be statistically significant. Conclusions This new NeuGuide™ device allows rapid and safe introduction of a suspending suture through the sacrospinous ligament and makes sacrospinous ligament fixation easy to perform, while avoiding dissection and mesh complications