Parental phonological memory contributes to prediction of outcome of late talkers from 20 months to 4 years: a longitudinal study of precursors of specific language impairment

Background Many children who are late talkers go on to develop normal language, but others go on to have longer-term language difficulties. In this study, we considered which factors were predictive of persistent problems in late talkers. Methods Parental report of expressive vocabulary at 18 months of age was used to select 26 late talkers and 70 average talkers, who were assessed for language and cognitive ability at 20 months of age. Follow-up at 4 years of age was carried out for 24 late and 58 average talkers. A psychometric test battery was used to categorize children in terms of language status (unimpaired or impaired) and nonverbal ability (normal range or more than 1 SD below average). The vocabulary and non-word repetition skills of the accompanying parent were also assessed. Results Among the late talkers, seven (29%) met our criteria for specific language impairment (SLI) at 4 years of age, and a further two (8%) had low nonverbal ability. In the group of average talkers, eight (14%) met the criteria for SLI at 4 years, and five other children (8%) had low nonverbal ability. Family history of language problems was slightly better than late-talker status as a predictor of SLI.. The best predictors of SLI at 20 months of age were score on the receptive language scale of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and the parent's performance on a non-word repetition task. Maternal education was not a significant predictor of outcome. Conclusions In this study, around three-quarters of late talkers did not have any language difficulties at 4 years of age, provided there was no family history of language impairment. A family history of language-literacy problems was found to be a significant predictor for persisting problems. Nevertheless, there are children with SLI for whom prediction is difficult because they did not have early language delay

Evaluation of an automatic oscillometric method and of various cuffs for the measurement of arterial pressure in the neonate

We compared simultaneous measurements of aortic, direct (Dir) and of indirect (Ind) systolic (S), mean (M) and diastolic (D) arterial pressure (AP) determined by an automatic oscillometric instrument (DINAMAP) in neonates with birthweight of 1000-3680 g. DINAMAP measurements were performed with cuffs of increasing width and length, recommended by the manufacturer for increasing arm circumference, and with a Standard sized cuff (2.5 x 15 cm), previously considered as suitable for neonates of any body size. In addition, we compared simultaneous measurements of Dir SAP and of Ind SAP determined by a Doppler technique and the Standard cuff. In DINAMAP SAP measurements with the Standard cuff, a statistically significant correlation between arm circumference and ΔInd-Dir SAP values (i.e. the difference between simultaneous Ind and Dir SAP measurements) was found. In DINAMAP MAP measurements with the cuff recommended for arm circumference, a statistically significant difference of the mean ΔInd-Dir MAP values was observed in infants whose arm was or was not completely encircled by the bladder of the cuff. In SAP as well as in MAP DINAMAP determinations, the overall error of measurement with the Standard cuff was smaller than with the recommended cuff. The Doppler method was found considerably more accurate than the DINAMAP method for the determination of SAP. In spite of these limitations, the DINAMAP method with the Standard cuff was considered to be reasonably accurate for the clinical determination of SAP and MAP, provided that several consecutive measurements are performed and averaged in order to minimize the error of measurement. When considering DAP measurements the error was so unacceptably high than the DINA-MAP method cannot be recommended for clinical use. The need for a careful consideration of the cuff characteristics when evaluating new methods for the indirect measurement of AP in the neonate is emphasized