Potential limitations in COVID-19 machine learning due to data source variability: A case study in the nCov2019 dataset

[EN] Objective: The lack of representative coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) data is a bottleneck for reliable and generalizable machine learning. Data sharing is insufficient without data quality, in which source variability plays an important role. We showcase and discuss potential biases from data source variability for COVID-19 machine learning. Materials and Methods: We used the publicly available nCov2019 dataset, including patient-level data from several countries. We aimed to the discovery and classification of severity subgroups using symptoms and comorbidities. Results: Cases from the 2 countries with the highest prevalence were divided into separate subgroups with distinct severity manifestations. This variability can reduce the representativeness of training data with respect the model target populations and increase model complexity at risk of overfitting. Conclusions: Data source variability is a potential contributor to bias in distributed research networks. We call for systematic assessment and reporting of data source variability and data quality in COVID-19 data sharing, as key information for reliable and generalizable machine learning.This work was supported by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia contract no. UPV-SUB.2-1302 and FONDO SUPERA COVID-19 by CRUE-Santander Bank grant "Severity Subgroup Discovery and Classification on COVID-19 Real World Data through Machine Learning and Data Quality assessment (SUBCOVERWD-19)."Sáez Silvestre, C.; Romero, N.; Conejero, JA.; Garcia-Gomez, JM. (2021). Potential limitations in COVID-19 machine learning due to data source variability: A case study in the nCov2019 dataset. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 28(2):360-364. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa25836036428

Subphenotyping of Mexican Patients With COVID-19 at Preadmission To Anticipate Severity Stratification: Age-Sex Unbiased Meta-Clustering Technique

[EN] Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an unprecedented global health care challenge for both medical institutions and researchers. Recognizing different COVID-19 subphenotypes-the division of populations of patients into more meaningful subgroups driven by clinical features-and their severity characterization may assist clinicians during the clinical course, the vaccination process, research efforts, the surveillance system, and the allocation of limited resources. Objective: We aimed to discover age-sex unbiased COVID-19 patient subphenotypes based on easily available phenotypical data before admission, such as pre-existing comorbidities, lifestyle habits, and demographic features, to study the potential early severity stratification capabilities of the discovered subgroups through characterizing their severity patterns, including prognostic, intensive care unit (ICU), and morbimortality outcomes. Methods: We used the Mexican Government COVID-19 open data, including 778,692 SARS-CoV-2 population-based patient-level data as of September 2020. We applied a meta-clustering technique that consists of a 2-stage clustering approach combining dimensionality reduction (ie, principal components analysis and multiple correspondence analysis) and hierarchical clustering using the Ward minimum variance method with Euclidean squared distance. Results: In the independent age-sex clustering analyses, 56 clusters supported 11 clinically distinguishable meta-clusters (MCs). MCs 1-3 showed high recovery rates (90.27%-95.22%), including healthy patients of all ages, children with comorbidities and priority in receiving medical resources (ie, higher rates of hospitalization, intubation, and ICU admission) compared with other adult subgroups that have similar conditions, and young obese smokers. MCs 4-5 showed moderate recovery rates (81.30%-82.81%), including patients with hypertension or diabetes of all ages and obese patients with pneumonia, hypertension, and diabetes. MCs 6-11 showed low recovery rates (53.96%-66.94%), including immunosuppressed patients with high comorbidity rates, patients with chronic kidney disease with a poor survival length and probability of recovery, older smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, older adults with severe diabetes and hypertension, and the oldest obese smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild cardiovascular disease. Group outcomes conformed to the recent literature on dedicated age-sex groups. Mexican states and several types of clinical institutions showed relevant heterogeneity regarding severity, potentially linked to socioeconomic or health inequalities. Conclusions: The proposed 2-stage cluster analysis methodology produced a discriminative characterization of the sample and explainability over age and sex. These results can potentially help in understanding the clinical patient and their stratification for automated early triage before further tests and laboratory results are available and even in locations where additional tests are not available or to help decide resource allocation among vulnerable subgroups such as to prioritize vaccination or treatments.We sincerely thank the different types of clinical institutions and the Mexican government, which made a huge effort to make these data publicly available. We also thank the clinicians and epidemiologists from the Servicios de Salud de Nayarit for the useful discussions on specific aspects of the medical attention to hospitalized patients and the reporting of epidemiological data processes related to COVID-19. Furthermore, we would also like to thank Francisco Tomas Garcia Ruiz for his valuable help in data visualization design. This work was supported by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia contract no. UPV-SUB.2-1302 and FONDO SUPERA COVID-19 by CRUE-Santander Bank grant: "Severity Subgroup Discovery and Classification on COVID-19 Real World Data through Machine Learning and Data Quality assessment (SUBCOVERWD-19) ." The authors thank the Institute for Information and Communication Technologies (ITACA) at the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia for its support in the publication of this manuscript.Zhou, L.; Romero-Garcia, N.; Martínez-Miranda, J.; Conejero, JA.; Garcia-Gomez, JM.; Sáez Silvestre, C. (2022). Subphenotyping of Mexican Patients With COVID-19 at Preadmission To Anticipate Severity Stratification: Age-Sex Unbiased Meta-Clustering Technique. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 8(3):1-21. https://doi.org/10.2196/300321218

Clinical phenotypes and outcomes in children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome across SARS-CoV-2 variant eras: a multinational study from the 4CE consortiumResearch in context

Summary: Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a severe complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It remains unclear how MIS-C phenotypes vary across SARS-CoV-2 variants. We aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of MIS-C across SARS-CoV-2 eras. Methods: We performed a multicentre observational retrospective study including seven paediatric hospitals in four countries (France, Spain, U.K., and U.S.). All consecutive confirmed patients with MIS-C hospitalised between February 1st, 2020, and May 31st, 2022, were included. Electronic Health Records (EHR) data were used to calculate pooled risk differences (RD) and effect sizes (ES) at site level, using Alpha as reference. Meta-analysis was used to pool data across sites. Findings: Of 598 patients with MIS-C (61% male, 39% female; mean age 9.7 years [SD 4.5]), 383 (64%) were admitted in the Alpha era, 111 (19%) in the Delta era, and 104 (17%) in the Omicron era. Compared with patients admitted in the Alpha era, those admitted in the Delta era were younger (ES −1.18 years [95% CI −2.05, −0.32]), had fewer respiratory symptoms (RD −0.15 [95% CI −0.33, −0.04]), less frequent non-cardiogenic shock or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (RD −0.35 [95% CI −0.64, −0.07]), lower lymphocyte count (ES −0.16 × 109/uL [95% CI −0.30, −0.01]), lower C-reactive protein (ES −28.5 mg/L [95% CI −46.3, −10.7]), and lower troponin (ES −0.14 ng/mL [95% CI −0.26, −0.03]). Patients admitted in the Omicron versus Alpha eras were younger (ES −1.6 years [95% CI −2.5, −0.8]), had less frequent SIRS (RD −0.18 [95% CI −0.30, −0.05]), lower lymphocyte count (ES −0.39 × 109/uL [95% CI −0.52, −0.25]), lower troponin (ES −0.16 ng/mL [95% CI −0.30, −0.01]) and less frequently received anticoagulation therapy (RD −0.19 [95% CI −0.37, −0.04]). Length of hospitalization was shorter in the Delta versus Alpha eras (−1.3 days [95% CI −2.3, −0.4]). Interpretation: Our study suggested that MIS-C clinical phenotypes varied across SARS-CoV-2 eras, with patients in Delta and Omicron eras being younger and less sick. EHR data can be effectively leveraged to identify rare complications of pandemic diseases and their variation over time. Funding: None