12 research outputs found

    Assessing pathogenicity of MLH1 variants by co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 genes in yeast

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Loss of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) in humans, mainly due to mutations in the <it>hMLH1 </it>gene, is linked to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). Because not all <it>MLH1 </it>alterations result in loss of MMR function, accurate characterization of variants and their classification in terms of their effect on MMR function is essential for reliable genetic testing and effective treatment. To date, <it>in vivo </it>assays for functional characterization of <it>MLH1 </it>mutations performed in various model systems have used episomal expression of the modified MMR genes. We describe here a novel approach to determine accurately the functional significance of <it>hMLH1 </it>mutations <it>in vivo</it>, based on co-expression of human MLH1 and PMS2 in yeast cells.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Yeast <it>MLH1 </it>and <it>PMS1 </it>genes, whose protein products form the MutLα complex, were replaced by human orthologs directly on yeast chromosomes by homologous recombination, and the resulting MMR activity was tested.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The yeast strain co-expressing hMLH1 and hPMS2 exhibited the same mutation rate as the wild-type. Eight cancer-related <it>MLH1 </it>variants were introduced, using the same approach, into the prepared yeast model, and their effect on MMR function was determined. Five variants (A92P, S93G, I219V, K618R and K618T) were classified as non-pathogenic, whereas variants T117M, Y646C and R659Q were characterized as pathogenic.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Results of our <it>in vivo </it>yeast-based approach correlate well with clinical data in five out of seven hMLH1 variants and the described model was thus shown to be useful for functional characterization of <it>MLH1 </it>variants in cancer patients found throughout the entire coding region of the gene.</p

    TRIM28 and β-actin identified via nanobody-based reverse proteomics approach as possible human glioblastoma biomarkers.

    No full text
    Malignant gliomas are among the rarest brain tumours, and they have the worst prognosis. Grade IV astrocytoma, known as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), is a highly lethal disease where the standard therapies of surgery, followed by radiation and chemotherapy, cannot significantly prolong the life expectancy of the patients. Tumour recurrence shows more aggressive form compared to the primary tumour, and results in patient survival from 12 to 15 months only. Although still controversial, the cancer stem cell hypothesis postulates that cancer stem cells are responsible for early relapse of the disease after surgical intervention due to their high resistance to therapy. Alternative strategies for GBM therapy are thus urgently needed. Nanobodies are single-domain antigen-binding fragments of heavy-chain antibodies, and together with classical antibodies, they are part of the camelid immune system. Nanobodies are small and stable, and they share a high degree of sequence identity to the human heavy chain variable domain, and these characteristics offer them advantages over classical antibodies or antibody fragments. We first immunised an alpaca with a human GBM stem-like cell line prepared from primary GBM cultures. Next, a nanobody library was constructed in a phage-display vector. Using nanobody phage-display technology, we selected specific GBM stem-like cell binders through a number of affinity selections, using whole cell protein extracts and membrane protein-enriched extracts from eight different GBM patients, and membrane protein-enriched extracts from two established GBM stem-like cell lines (NCH644 and NCH421K cells). After the enrichment, periplasmic extract ELISA was used to screen for specific clones. These nanobody clones were recloned into the pHEN6 vector, expressed in Escherichia coli WK6, and purified using immobilised metal affinity chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography. Specific nanobody:antigen pairs were obtained and mass spectrometry analysis revealed two proteins, TRIM28 and β-actin, that were up-regulated in the GBM stem-like cells compared to the controls

    Virtual Screening Yields Inhibitors of Novel Antifungal Drug Target, Benzoate 4‑Monooxygenase

    No full text
    Fungal CYP53 enzymes are highly conserved proteins, involved in phenolic detoxification, and have no homologues in higher eukaryotes, rendering them favorable drug targets. Aiming to discover novel CYP53 inhibitors, we employed two parallel virtual screening protocols and evaluated highest scoring hit compounds by analyzing the spectral binding interactions, by surveying the antifungal activity, and assessing the inhibition of catalytic activity. On the basis of combined results, we selected 3-methyl-4-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)­benzoic acid (compound <b>2</b>) as the best candidate for hit-to-lead follow-up in the antifungal drug discovery process

    Virtual Screening Yields Inhibitors of Novel Antifungal Drug Target, Benzoate 4‑Monooxygenase

    No full text
    Fungal CYP53 enzymes are highly conserved proteins, involved in phenolic detoxification, and have no homologues in higher eukaryotes, rendering them favorable drug targets. Aiming to discover novel CYP53 inhibitors, we employed two parallel virtual screening protocols and evaluated highest scoring hit compounds by analyzing the spectral binding interactions, by surveying the antifungal activity, and assessing the inhibition of catalytic activity. On the basis of combined results, we selected 3-methyl-4-(1H-pyrrol-1-yl)­benzoic acid (compound <b>2</b>) as the best candidate for hit-to-lead follow-up in the antifungal drug discovery process

    Schematic presentation of the whole workflow.

    No full text
    <p>1. Material preparation – expanding a GBM cell line, laminin grown and enriched in stem-like cells, 2. Llama immunization with whole GBM cells, 3. Construction of a nanobody library, 4. Phage display cycle – enrichment of antigen specific nanobodies on various biological samples (whole protein extract from GBM tissues, membrane protein-enriched fractions from GBM tissues and GBM stem-like cell lines), 5. ELISA - selection of GBM specific nanobodies, 6. Nanobody production – large scale production and purification of specific nanobodies, 7. Nanobody:antigen pairs – immobilizing the nanobodies and binding to the corresponding antigens, 8. Antigen identification by mass spectrometry, 9. Antigen validation by Western blot. See Materials and methods for additional experimental details.</p

    Schematic presentation of the structure of TRIM28.

    No full text
    <p>The conserved RBCC motif is present at the N-terminal domain; the variable C-domain includes the PHD and BROMO domains. Image adapted from Hatakeyama <i>et al</i>. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0113688#pone.0113688-Hatakeyama1" target="_blank">[45]</a>. Author's approval was obtained for the use of this image; original image is given in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0113688#pone.0113688.s002" target="_blank">Figure S2</a>.</p

    Antigen validation.

    No full text
    <p>Western blot membrane after probing with a monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (36 kDa band) used as an internal control for amount of protein loaded in each lane, a monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (48 kDa band) and monoclonal anti-TRIM28 antibody (100 kDa band). Samples: GSCm – membrane protein-enriched extract isolated from GBM stem-like cell lines; GBMm – membrane protein-enriched extract isolated from GBM tissues; NBTm – membrane protein-enriched extract isolated from human brain samples; GSCc – cytosolic/nuclear protein fraction isolated from GBM stem-like cell lines; GBMc – cytosolic/nuclear protein fraction isolated from GBM tissues; NBTc – cytosolic/nuclear protein fraction isolated from human brain samples; GBMw – whole protein extract from GBM tissues; NBTw – whole protein extract from human brain samples.</p

    Relative band intensities of antigens validated with Western blot.

    No full text
    <p>The relative band intentisy of the antigens, TRIM28 and β-actin, was calculated as the ratio between arbitrary units of the band of the antigen and the arbitrary units of the band of the internal control, GAPDH [AU(antigen)/AU(GAPDH)]. Samples: GSCc – cytosolic/nuclear protein fraction isolated from GBM stem-like cell lines; GBMc – cytosolic/nuclear protein fraction isolated from GBM tissues; NBTc – cytosolic/nuclear protein fraction isolated from human brain samples.</p
    corecore