Interoperable and explainable machine learning models to predict morbidity and mortality in acute neurological injury in the pediatric intensive care unit: secondary analysis of the TOPICC study

BackgroundAcute neurological injury is a leading cause of permanent disability and death in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). No predictive model has been validated for critically ill children with acute neurological injury.ObjectivesWe hypothesized that PICU patients with concern for acute neurological injury are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality, and advanced analytics would derive robust, explainable subgroup models.MethodsWe performed a secondary subgroup analysis of the Trichotomous Outcomes in Pediatric Critical Care (TOPICC) study (2011–2013), predicting mortality and morbidity from admission physiology (lab values and vital signs in 6 h surrounding admission). We analyzed patients with suspected acute neurological injury using standard machine learning algorithms. Feature importance was analyzed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). We created a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) application to demonstrate potential for interoperability using pragmatic data.Results1,860 patients had suspected acute neurological injury at PICU admission, with higher morbidity (8.2 vs. 3.4%) and mortality (6.2 vs. 1.9%) than those without similar concern. The ensemble regressor (containing Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Machine learners) produced the best model, with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) of 0.91 [95% CI (0.88, 0.94)] and Average Precision (AP) of 0.59 [0.51, 0.69] for mortality, and decreased performance predicting simultaneous mortality and morbidity (0.83 [0.80, 0.86] and 0.59 [0.51, 0.64]); at a set specificity of 0.995, positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.79 for mortality, and 0.88 for mortality and morbidity. By comparison, for mortality, the TOPICC logistic regression had AUROC of 0.90 [0.84, 0.93], but substantially inferior AP of 0.49 [0.35, 0.56] and PPV of 0.60 at specificity 0.995. Feature importance analysis showed that pupillary non-reactivity, Glasgow Coma Scale, and temperature were the most contributory vital signs, and acidosis and coagulopathy the most important laboratory values. The FHIR application provided a simulated demonstration of real-time health record query and model deployment.ConclusionsPICU patients with suspected acute neurological injury have higher mortality and morbidity. Our machine learning approach independently identified previously-known causes of secondary brain injury. Advanced modeling achieves improved positive predictive value in this important population compared to published models, providing a stepping stone in the path to deploying explainable models as interoperable bedside decision-support tools

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

Background Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population.The aim of this study was to inform vaccination prioritization by modelling the impact of vaccination on elective inpatient surgery. The study found that patients aged at least 70 years needing elective surgery should be prioritized alongside other high-risk groups during early vaccination programmes. Once vaccines are rolled out to younger populations, prioritizing surgical patients is advantageous