Dam body weight at conception and outcomes of pregnancy in NFD and HFD groups.

<p>a) Dam body weight (b = 0.03 vs. 0.02, both <i>P</i><0.05), b) Litter size (b = −0.30 vs. −0.26, both <i>P</i><0.01), c) Percent male biased litters (b = −4.29, <i>P</i><0.01vs. −0.36, <i>P</i>>0.05) and d) Sex ratio (<i>b</i> = −0.02, <i>P</i><0.01 vs. 0.00, <i>P</i>>0.05). Squares represent NFD, crosses represent HFD, broken and solid lines are linear trends through NFD and HFD datasets, respectively.</p

The summary (Mean ± SD) of dam body weight, litter size and sex ratio from NFD and HFD groups.

<p>The regression coefficient for rate of change in the variables with crowding is presented as <i>b</i>.</p

Analysis of variance summary for dam body weight, litter size, sex ratio and proportion of male biased litters from NFD and HFD groups.

<p>Analysis of variance summary for dam body weight, litter size, sex ratio and proportion of male biased litters from NFD and HFD groups.</p