6 research outputs found
Community narratives about women and HIV risk in 21 high-burden communities in Zambia and South Africa.
Public health researchers repeatedly represent women as a group vulnerable to ill health. This has been particularly true in the field of HIV research, where women are disproportionately affected by HIV in terms of disease burden and the social effects of the epidemic. Although women have been the focus of many prevention and treatment programs, structural barriers to implementation of these targeted programs persist. In this article we explore how high HIV-burden communities in South Africa and Zambia engage with the concepts of "woman" and "HIV risk". The data are drawn from participatory storytelling activities completed with 604 participants across 78 group discussions between December 2012 and May 2013. During discussions we found that participants made use of the core archetypal caricatures of "goodness," "badness," and "vulnerability" when describing women's HIV risk. Community members shifted between these categories in their characterizations of women, as they acknowledged the multiple roles women play, internalized different stories about women, and sometimes shifted register in the same stories. Findings suggest that health implementers, in consultation with community members, should consider the multiple positions women occupy and how this impacts the wider community's understandings of women and "risk". This approach of taking on board community understandings of the complexity of HIV risk can inform the design and implementation of HIV prevention and care programs by rendering programs more focused and in-line with community needs
Households, fluidity, and HIV service delivery in Zambia and South Africa ā an exploratory analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial
CITATION: Hoddinott, G., et al. 2018. Households, fluidity, and HIV service delivery in Zambia and South Africa ā an exploratory analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 21(4):e25135, doi:10.1002/jia2.25135.The original publication is available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.comIntroduction: Population distributions, family and household compositions, and peopleās sense of belonging and social stability
in southern Africa have been shaped by tumultuous, continuing large-scale historical disruptions. As a result, many people
experience high levels of geographic and social fluidity, which intersect with individual and population-level migration patterns.
We describe the complexities of household fluidity and HIV service access in South Africa and Zambia to explore implications
for health systems and service delivery in contexts of high household fluidity.
Methods: HPTN 071 (PopART) is a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial implemented in 21 peri-urban study communities
in Zambia and South Africa between 2013 and 2018. A qualitative cohort nested in the trial included 148 purposively
sampled households. Data collection was informed by ethnographic and participatory research principles. The analysis
process was reflexive and findings are descriptive narrative summaries of emergent ideas.
Results: Households in southern Africa are extremely fluid, with people having a tenuous sense of security in their social networks.
This fluidity intersects with high individual and population mobility. To characterize fluidity, we describe thematic patterns
of household membership and residence. We also identify reasons people give for moving around and shifting social ties,
including economic survival, fostering interpersonal relationships, participating in cultural, traditional, religious, or familial gatherings,
being institutionalized, and maintaining patterns of substance use. High fluidity disrupted HIV service access for some
participants. Despite these challenges, many participants were able to regularly access HIV testing services and participants
living with HIV were especially resourceful in maintaining continuity of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We identify three key features
of health service interactions that facilitated care continuity: disclosure to family members, understanding attitudes
among health services staff including flexibility to accommodate clientsā transient pressures, and participantsā agency in ARTrelated
decisions.
Conclusions: Choices made to manage oneās experiential sense of household fluidity are intentional responses to livelihood
and social support constraints. To enhance retention in care for people living with HIV, policy makers and service providers
should focus on creating responsive, flexible health service delivery systems designed to accommodate many shifts in client
circumstances.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jia2.25135Publisher's versio
Households, fluidity, and HIV service delivery in Zambia and South Africa - an exploratory analysis of longitudinal qualitative data from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial.
INTRODUCTION: Population distributions, family and household compositions, and people's sense of belonging and social stability in southern Africa have been shaped by tumultuous, continuing large-scale historical disruptions. As a result, many people experience high levels of geographic and social fluidity, which intersect with individual and population-level migration patterns. We describe the complexities of household fluidity and HIV service access in South Africa and Zambia to explore implications for health systems and service delivery in contexts of high household fluidity. METHODS: HPTN 071 (PopART) is a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial implemented in 21 peri-urban study communities in Zambia and South Africa between 2013 and 2018. A qualitative cohort nested in the trial included 148 purposively sampled households. Data collection was informed by ethnographic and participatory research principles. The analysis process was reflexive and findings are descriptive narrative summaries of emergent ideas. RESULTS: Households in southern Africa are extremely fluid, with people having a tenuous sense of security in their social networks. This fluidity intersects with high individual and population mobility. To characterize fluidity, we describe thematic patterns of household membership and residence. We also identify reasons people give for moving around and shifting social ties, including economic survival, fostering interpersonal relationships, participating in cultural, traditional, religious, or familial gatherings, being institutionalized, and maintaining patterns of substance use. High fluidity disrupted HIV service access for some participants. Despite these challenges, many participants were able to regularly access HIV testing services and participants living with HIV were especially resourceful in maintaining continuity of antiretroviral therapy (ART). We identify three key features of health service interactions that facilitated care continuity: disclosure to family members, understanding attitudes among health services staff including flexibility to accommodate clients' transient pressures, and participants' agency in ART-related decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Choices made to manage one's experiential sense of household fluidity are intentional responses to livelihood and social support constraints. To enhance retention in care for people living with HIV, policy makers and service providers should focus on creating responsive, flexible health service delivery systems designed to accommodate many shifts in client circumstances
How 'place' matters for addressing the HIV epidemic: evidence from the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomised controlled trial in Zambia and South Africa.
BACKGROUND: In a cluster-randomised trial (CRT) of combination HIV prevention (HPTN 071 (PopART)) in 12 Zambian communities and nine South African communities, carried out from 2012 to 2018, the intervention arm A that offered HIV treatment irrespective of CD4 count did not have a significant impact on population level HIV incidence. Intervention arm B, where HIV incidence was reduced by 30%, followed national guidelines that mid trial (2016) changed from starting HIV treatment according to a CD4 threshold of 500 to universal treatment. Using social science data on the 21 communities, we consider how place (community context) might have influenced the primary outcome result. METHODS: A social science component documented longitudinally the context of trial communities. Data were collected through rapid qualitative assessment, interviews, group discussions and observations. There were a total of 1547 participants and 1127 observations. Using these data, literature and a series of qualitative analysis steps, we identified key community characteristics of relevance to HIV and triangulated these with HIV community level incidence. RESULTS: Two interdependent social factors were relevant to communities' capability to manage HIV: stability/instability and responsiveness/resistance. Key components of stability were social cohesion; limited social change; a vibrant local economy; better health, education and recreational services; strong institutional presence; established middle-class residents; predictable mobility; and less poverty and crime. Key components of responsiveness were community leadership being open to change, stronger history of HIV initiatives, willingness to take up HIV services, less HIV-related stigma and a supported and enterprising youth population. There was a clear pattern of social factors across arms. Intervention arm A communities were notably more resistant and unstable. Intervention arm B communities were overall more responsive and stable. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific case of the dissonant primary outcome results from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial, the chance allocation of less stable, less responsive communities to arm A compared to arm B may explain some of the apparently smaller impact of the intervention in arm A. Stability and responsiveness appear to be two key social factors that may be relevant to secular trends in HIV incidence. We advocate for a systematic approach, using these factors as a framework, to community context in CRTs and monitoring HIV prevention efforts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01900977 . Registered on July 17, 2013
Universal HIV testing and treatment and HIV stigma reduction: a comparative thematic analysis of qualitative data from the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial in South Africa and Zambia
Despite continued development of effective HIV treatment, expanded access to care and advances in prevention modalities, HIVārelated stigma persists. We examine how, in the context of a universal HIVātesting and treatment trial in South Africa and Zambia, increased availability of HIV services influenced conceptualisations of HIV. Using qualitative data, we explore peopleās stigmaārelated experiences of living in āinterventionā and ācontrolā study communities. We conducted exploratory data analysis from a qualitative cohort of 150 households in 13 study communities, collected between 2016 and 2018. We found that increased availability of HIVātesting services influenced conceptualisations of HIV as normative (nonāexceptional) and the visibility of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in household and community spaces impacted opportunities for stigma. There was a shift in community narratives towards individual responsibility to take up (assumingly) widely available service ā for PLHIV to take care of their own health and to prevent onward transmission. Based on empirical data, we show that, despite a growing acceptance of HIVārelated testing services, anticipated stigma persists through the mechanism of shifting responsibilisation. To mitigate the responsibilisation of PLHIV, heath implementers need to adapt antiāstigma messaging and especially focus on anticipated stigma