Sepsis: Changing Definitions, Unchanging Treatment

The recently revised Sepsis-3 definitions were based on criteria that were derived and validated in adult patient databases from high income countries. Both sepsis and septic shock continue to account for a substantial proportion of mortality globally, especially amongst children in low-and-middle income country settings. It is therefore urgent to develop and validate standardized criteria for sepsis that can be applied to pediatric populations in different settings, including in- and outside intensive care, both in high- and low/middle- income countries. This will be a pre-requisite to evaluate the impact of sepsis treatment strategies to improve clinical outcomes

Microvascular dysfunction in septic and dengue shock: pathophysiology and implications for clinical management

The microcirculation comprising of arterioles, capillaries and post-capillary venules is the terminal vascular network of the systemic circulation. Microvascular homeostasis, comprising of a balance between vasoconstriction, vasodilation and endothelial permeability in healthy states, regulates tissue perfusion. In severe infections, systemic inflammation occurs irrespective of the infecting microorganism(s), resulting in microcirculatory dysregulation and dysfunction, which impairs tissue perfusion and often precedes end-organ failure. The common hallmarks of microvascular dysfunction in both septic shock and dengue shock, are endothelial cell activation, glycocalyx degradation and plasma leak through a disrupted endothelial barrier. Microvascular tone is also impaired by a reduced bioavailability of nitric oxide. In vitro and in vivo studies have however demonstrated that the nature and extent of microvascular dysfunction as well as responses to volume expansion resuscitation differ in these two clinical syndromes. This review compares and contrasts the pathophysiology of microcirculatory dysfunction in septic versus dengue shock and the attendant effects of fluid administration during resuscitation

Characterizing preclinical sub-phenotypic models of acute respiratory distress syndrome:An experimental ovine study

Abstract The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) describes a heterogenous population of patients with acute severe respiratory failure. However, contemporary advances have begun to identify distinct sub‐phenotypes that exist within its broader envelope. These sub‐phenotypes have varied outcomes and respond differently to several previously studied interventions. A more precise understanding of their pathobiology and an ability to prospectively identify them, may allow for the development of precision therapies in ARDS. Historically, animal models have played a key role in translational research, although few studies have so far assessed either the ability of animal models to replicate these sub‐phenotypes or investigated the presence of sub‐phenotypes within animal models. Here, in three ovine models of ARDS, using combinations of oleic acid and intravenous, or intratracheal lipopolysaccharide, we investigated the presence of sub‐phenotypes which qualitatively resemble those found in clinical cohorts. Principal Component Analysis and partitional clustering identified two clusters, differentiated by markers of shock, inflammation, and lung injury. This study provides a first exploration of ARDS phenotypes in preclinical models and suggests a methodology for investigating this phenomenon in future studies

Pre-clinical study protocol: Blood transfusion in endotoxaemic shock

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SCC) and the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guidelines recommend blood transfusion in sepsis when the haemoglobin concentration drops below 7.0 g/dL and 10.0 g/dL respectively, while the World Health Organisation (WHO) guideline recommends transfusion in septic shock ‘if intravenous (IV) fluids do not maintain adequate circulation’, as a supportive measure of last resort. Volume expansion using crystalloid and colloid fluid boluses for haemodynamic resuscitation in severe illness/sepsis, has been associated with adverse outcomes in recent literature. However, the volume expansion effect(s) following blood transfusion for haemodynamic circulatory support, in severe illness remain unclear with most previous studies having focused on evaluating effects of either different RBC storage durations (short versus long duration) or haemoglobin thresholds (low versus high threshold) pre-transfusion. We describe the protocol for a pre-clinical randomised controlled trial designed to examine haemodynamic effect(s) of early volume expansion using packed RBCs (PRBCs) transfusion (before any crystalloids or colloids) in a validated ovine-model of hyperdynamic endotoxaemic shock. Additional exploration of mechanisms underlying any physiological, haemodynamic, haematological, immunologic and tissue specific-effects of blood transfusion will be undertaken including comparison of effects of short (5 days) versus long ( 30 days) storage duration of PRBCs prior to transfusion.National Health and Medical Research Council, NHMRC, Australia (Grant ID APP1061382), Emergency Medicine Foundation, EMF, Australia (Grant ID EMPJ-358R25-2016), Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Nchafatso G. Obonyo is supported and funded through the DELTAS Africa Initiative [DEL-15-003]. The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust [107769/Z/10/Z] and the UK government

Combined Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy and ECMO in ARDS:A Controlled Experimental Study in Sheep

Rationale: Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy is a promising intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), although trials to date have not investigated its use alongside extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Recent preclinical studies have suggested that combining these interventions may attenuate the efficacy of ECMO. Objectives: To determine the safety and efficacy of MSC therapy in a model of ARDS and ECMO. Methods: ARDS was induced in 14 sheep, after which they were established on venovenous ECMO. Subsequently, they received either endobronchial induced pluripotent stem cell-derived human MSCs (hMSCs) (n = 7) or cell-free carrier vehicle (vehicle control; n = 7). During ECMO, a low VT ventilation strategy was employed in addition to protocolized hemodynamic support. Animals were monitored and supported for 24 hours. Lung tissue, bronchoalveolar fluid, and plasma were analyzed, in addition to continuous respiratory and hemodynamic monitoring. Measurements and Main Results: The administration of hMSCs did not improve oxygenation (PaO2/FIO2 mean difference =2146mmHg; P= 0.076) or pulmonary function.However, histological evidence of lung injury(lung injuryscoremeandifference=20.07;P=0.04) and BALIL-8 were reduced. In addition, hMSC-treated animals had a significantly lower cumulative requirement for vasopressor. Despite endobronchial administration, animals treated with hMSCs had a significant elevation in transmembrane oxygenator pressure gradients. Thiswas accompanied by more pulmonary artery thromboses and adherent hMSCs found on explanted oxygenator fibers. Conclusions: Endobronchial hMSC therapy in an ovine model of ARDS and ECMO can impair membrane oxygenator function and does not improve oxygenation. These data do not recommend the safe use of hMSCs during venovenous ECMO. </p

The effects of nitric oxide on coagulation and inflammation in ex vivo models of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass

Background Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has extensive applications in managing patients with acute cardiac and pulmonary failure. Two primary modalities of ECLS, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), include several similarities in their composition, complications, and patient outcomes. Both CPB and ECMO pose a high risk of thrombus formation and platelet activation due to the large surface area of the devices and bleeding due to system anticoagulation. Therefore, novel methods of anticoagulation are needed to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with extracorporeal support. Nitric oxide (NO) has potent antiplatelet properties and presents a promising alternative or addition to anticoagulation with heparin during extracorporeal support. Methods We developed two ex vivo models of CPB and ECMO to investigate NO effects on anticoagulation and inflammation in these systems. Results Sole addition of NO as an anticoagulant was not successful in preventing thrombus formation in the ex vivo setups, therefore a combination of low-level heparin with NO was used. Antiplatelet effects were observed in the ex vivo ECMO model when NO was delivered at 80 ppm. Platelet count was preserved after 480 min when NO was delivered at 30 ppm. Conclusion Combined delivery of NO and heparin did not improve haemocompatibility in either ex vivo model of CPB and ECMO. Anti-inflammatory effects of NO in ECMO systems have to be evaluated further

A clinically relevant sheep model of orthotopic heart transplantation 24 h after donor brainstem death

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HTx) from brainstem dead (BSD) donors is the gold-standard therapy for severe/end-stage cardiac disease, but is limited by a global donor heart shortage. Consequently, innovative solutions to increase donor heart availability and utilisation are rapidly expanding. Clinically relevant preclinical models are essential for evaluating interventions for human translation, yet few exist that accurately mimic all key HTx components, incorporating injuries beginning in the donor, through to the recipient. To enable future assessment of novel perfusion technologies in our research program, we thus aimed to develop a clinically relevant sheep model of HTx following 24 h of donor BSD. METHODS: BSD donors (vs. sham neurological injury, 4/group) were hemodynamically supported and monitored for 24 h, followed by heart preservation with cold static storage. Bicaval orthotopic HTx was performed in matched recipients, who were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and monitored for 6 h. Donor and recipient blood were assayed for inflammatory and cardiac injury markers, and cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography. Repeated measurements between the two different groups during the study observation period were assessed by mixed ANOVA for repeated measures. RESULTS: Brainstem death caused an immediate catecholaminergic hemodynamic response (mean arterial pressure, p = 0.09), systemic inflammation (IL-6 - p = 0.025, IL-8 - p = 0.002) and cardiac injury (cardiac troponin I, p = 0.048), requiring vasopressor support (vasopressor dependency index, VDI, p = 0.023), with normalisation of biomarkers and physiology over 24 h. All hearts were weaned from CPB and monitored for 6 h post-HTx, except one (sham) recipient that died 2 h post-HTx. Hemodynamic (VDI - p = 0.592, heart rate - p = 0.747) and metabolic (blood lactate, p = 0.546) parameters post-HTx were comparable between groups, despite the observed physiological perturbations that occurred during donor BSD. All p values denote interaction among groups and time in the ANOVA for repeated measures. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully developed an ovine HTx model following 24 h of donor BSD. After 6 h of critical care management post-HTx, there were no differences between groups, despite evident hemodynamic perturbations, systemic inflammation, and cardiac injury observed during donor BSD. This preclinical model provides a platform for critical assessment of injury development pre- and post-HTx, and novel therapeutic evaluation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-021-00425-4

Myocardial and Microvascular Physiology in Septic Shock and Response to Volume Expansion Treatment

Despite being common clinical practice, volume expansion for septic shock resuscitation has been challenged by emerging evidence showing increased case-fatality. I hypothesised that volume expansion treatment in septic shock did not alter cardiac and microvascular physiologic functions. I conducted a systematic review on effects of volume expansion on the microcirculation in lipopolysaccharide-induced endotoxaemic shock; collaboratively developed of a large animal model of endotoxaemic shock and subsequently conducted a pre-clinical trial on volume expansion using either a fluid bolus or blood transfusion in the model; and finally, a longitudinal clinical observational study on volume resuscitated paediatric septic shock. The main findings were: (a) In the systematic review, 11 studies were included in which I found there were several different models with variations in definitions of endotoxaemic shock, timing of volume expansion resuscitation in relation to induction of endotoxaemia, duration of resuscitation, volume of fluid administered, methods used to assess the microcirculation and overall duration of the models. These differences precluded meta-analysis; (b) in the pre-clinical model, endotoxin infusion led to a reduction in mean arterial pressure, MAP from 85 ± 12.8 to 49 ± 8.0 mmHg (difference in means 36 mmHg; 95%CI 17.5 to 46.5; p<0.001) and fluid bolus treatment was associated with a higher cumulative median (IQR) noradrenaline requirement 68.9mg [19.3-140.0] to maintain a target MAP of 60-65mmHg compared to non-bolus sham 39.6mg [20.3-65.4] or healthy control (10mg [3-20]) (ꭓ2(2df) 11.04; p=0.004); (c) in the clinical observational study, mortality was higher among children presenting with WHO shock and managed with a fluid bolus (WHO guideline) compared to those with non-WHO shock receiving maintenance fluid only (100% versus 12.5%; risk difference, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.36-0.97; p= 0.007). Fluid bolus treatment was associated with elevated levels of circulating atrial natriuretic peptide, ANP and increased vasopressor requirements (pre-clinical study) and mortality outcome (clinical study)

Optimizing the patient and timing of the introduction of mechanical circulatory and extracorporeal respiratory support

Evolution of extracorporeal and implantable cardiorespiratory mechanical assist devices has added a new dimension to the management of patients with acute refractory cardiac and/or respiratory failure or in those who have end-stage cardiorespiratory disease. These devices serve as a viable bridge to decision or recovery, destination device, or transplantation. While the current generation of devices has evolved significantly, maximizing the likelihood of a successful outcome depends on thorough understanding of patient pathophysiology, early recognition of failure of conventional therapies, careful patient selection, and timely initiation of mechanical support. The risk-benefit ratios of various available mechanical assist devices, surgical techniques, and possible perfusion strategies applied are equally important. Currently, there are no clear data to indicate when the benefits of initiating temporary mechanical circulatory and extracorporeal respiratory support outweigh the risks of continuing with conventional therapies. However, there are some data to guide the timing of long-term MCS devices, which indicate that these devices should be implanted where possible in patients who are relatively stable on inotropic support. This review provides a summary of available literature in this regard. Further clinical research is necessary to specifically address the efficacy of various optimization strategies discussed in this review

Corrigendum: Sepsis: changing definitions, unchanging treatment (vol 6, 425, 2019)

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fped.2018.00425.]