5 research outputs found
Natural Gas and Cellulosic Biomass: A Clean Fuel Combination? Determining the Natural Gas Blending Wall in Biofuel Production
Natural
gas has the potential to increase the biofuel production
output by combining gas- and biomass-to-liquids (GBTL) processes followed
by naphtha and diesel fuel synthesis via Fischer–Tropsch (FT).
This study reflects on the use of commercial-ready configurations
of GBTL technologies and the environmental impact of enhancing biofuels
with natural gas. The autothermal and steam-methane reforming processes
for natural gas conversion and the gasification of biomass for FT
fuel synthesis are modeled to estimate system well-to-wheel emissions
and compare them to limits established by U.S. renewable fuel mandates.
We show that natural gas can enhance FT biofuel production by reducing
the need for water–gas shift (WGS) of biomass-derived syngas
to achieve appropriate H<sub>2</sub>/CO ratios. Specifically, fuel
yields are increased from less than 60 gallons per ton to over 100
gallons per ton with increasing natural gas input. However, GBTL facilities
would need to limit natural gas use to less than 19.1% on a LHV energy
basis (7.83 wt %) to avoid exceeding the emissions limits established
by the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2) for clean, advanced biofuels.
This effectively constitutes a <i>blending</i> limit that
constrains the use of natural gas for enhancing the biomass-to-liquids
(BTL) process
Simulation-Based Study of a Novel Integration: Geothermal–Biomass Power Plant
This
work investigates the potential to integrate a biomass combustor
with an existing geothermal power plant. The motivation is to identify
the most cost-effective approach to boost the geothermal turbine power
output using heat from the biomass combustor to superheat the geothermal
steam upstream of the turbine inlet. Different alternative integration
configurations were identified and simulated using Aspen Plus software
to evaluate their performance in terms of incremental power output
and efficiency. Of the three different alternatives proposed, only
one of them looked promisingthis configuration uses the saturated
well-steam for partial preheating of the combustion air. The most
promising integration options are compared on the basis of their levelized
cost of electricity. The key conclusion is that one should use low-grade
heat for low-level heating (well-steam for air preheating) and high-grade
heat from the flue gas for steam superheating. Also, the quantity
and quality of biomass available dictate the hybrid configuration
selected. A proper design of the steam turbine (higher efficiency
at higher steam inlet temperatures) is also necessary to enhance the
performance of the hybrid geothermal–biomass power plant