6 research outputs found
Ruthenium(0)-Catalyzed sp<sup>3</sup> C–H Bond Arylation of Benzylic Amines Using Arylboronates
A Ru-catalyzed direct arylation of benzylic sp<sup>3</sup> carbons of acyclic amines with arylboronates is reported. This highly regioselective and efficient transformation can be performed with various combinations of <i>N</i>-(2-pyridyl) substituted benzylamines and arylboronates. Substitution of the pyridine directing group in the 3-position proved to be crucial in order to achieve high arylation yields. Furthermore, the pyridine directing group can be removed in high yields via a two-step protocol
Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed sp<sup>3</sup> C–H Bond Arylation of Benzylic Amines Using Aryl Halides
A ruthenium(II)-catalyzed protocol for the direct arylation of benzylic amines was developed. Employing 3-substituted pyridines as directing groups, arylation was achieved using aryl bromides or aryl iodides as the aryl source. Potassium pivalate proved to be an important additive in this transformation. The arylation took place selectively in the benzylic sp<sup>3</sup> position, and no significant competitive sp<sup>2</sup> arylation was observed. Arylated imines were observed as byproducts in minor amounts. Additionally, reaction conditions for cleaving the pyridine group were established, enabling access to bis-arylated methylamines
Cross-Coupling of Remote <i>meta</i>-C–H Bonds Directed by a U‑Shaped Template
<i>meta</i>-C–H
arylation and methylation of 3-phenylpropanoic
acid and phenolic derivatives were developed using an easily removable
nitrile template. The combination of a weakly coordinating U-shaped
template and mono-protected amino acid ligand was crucial for the
cross-coupling of C–H bonds with organoborons
Mechanistic Investigations and Substrate Scope Evaluation of Ruthenium-Catalyzed Direct sp<sup>3</sup> Arylation of Benzylic Positions Directed by 3‑Substituted Pyridines
A highly efficient direct arylation process of benzylic amines
with arylboronates was developed that employs Ru catalysis. The arylation
takes place with greatest efficiency at the benzylic sp<sup>3</sup> carbon. If the distance to the activating aryl ring is increased,
arylation is still possible but the yield drops significantly. Efficiency
of the CH activation was found to be significantly increased by use
of 3-substituted pyridines as directing groups, which can be removed
after the transformation in high yield. Calculation of the energy
profile of different rotamers of the substrate revealed that presence
of a substituent in the 3-position favors a conformation with the
CH<sub>2</sub> group adopting a position in closer proximity to the
directing group and facilitating C–H insertion. This operationally
simple reaction can be carried out in argon atmosphere as well as
in air and under neutral reaction conditions, displaying a remarkable
functional group tolerance. Mechanistic studies were carried out and
critically compared to mechanistic reports of related transformations
Monoselective <i>o</i>‑C–H Functionalizations of Mandelic Acid and α‑Phenylglycine
Pd-catalyzed C–H
functionalization of mandelic acid and α-phenylglycine is reported.
We have developed different protocols for the arylation, iodination,
acetoxylation, and olefination of these substrates based on two different
(PdÂ(II)/PdÂ(IV) and PdÂ(II)/Pd(0)) catalytic cycles. Four crucial features
of these protocols are advantageous for practical applications. First,
the α-hydroxyl and amino groups are protected with simple protecting
groups such as acetates (Ac, Piv) and carbamates (Boc, Fmoc), respectively.
Second, these protocols do not involve installation and removal of
a directing group. Third, monoselectivity is accomplished. Fourth,
no epimerization occurs at the vulnerable α-chiral centers
Mechanistic and Kinetic Studies of the Direct Alkylation of Benzylic Amines: A Formal C(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H Activation Proceeds Actually via a C(sp<sup>2</sup>)–H Activation Pathway
Mechanistic investigations of a RhÂ(I)-catalyzed direct C–H
alkylation of benzylic amines with alkenes, formally an CÂ(sp<sup>3</sup>)–H activation, reveal this reaction to proceed via imine
intermediates and, hence, via CÂ(sp<sup>2</sup>)–H activation.
The reaction shows a primary kinetic isotope effect of 4.3 at the
benzylic C–H position together with a reversible H–D
exchange at the same position, which indicates that there are at least
two distinct steps in which the corresponding C–H bonds are
broken. The imine intermediates are shown to be converted to the final
product under the reaction conditions, and a time course analysis
of the alkylated imine intermediate shows that it is formed before
the final amine product in the course of the reaction