29 research outputs found

    Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Our investigation sought to compare changes in sexual function following supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who underwent supracervical hysterectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy at a tertiary care center. Patients who met criteria for participation were sent a one page confidential, anonymous questionnaire to assess sexual function experienced both pre- and postoperatively. A total of 69 patients in each group were eligible for participation. A multiple logistic regression model was used to analyze measured variables. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent (n = 33) of women undergoing a SCH returned the questionnaire, while 39% (n = 27) of those undergoing a TAH chose to participate. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Patients who underwent TAH reported worse postoperative sexual outcome than SCH patients with respect to intercourse frequency, orgasm frequency and overall sexual satisfaction (P = 0.01, 0.03, and 0.03, respectively). Irrespective of type of hysterectomy, 35% of patients who underwent bilateral salpingoophorectomy (BSO) with hysterectomy experienced worse overall sexual satisfaction compared to 3% of patients who underwent hysterectomy alone (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that TAH patients experienced worse postoperative sexual function than SCH patients with respect to intercourse frequency and overall sexual satisfaction. Irrespective of type of hysterectomy, patients who underwent bilateral salpingoophorectomy experienced worse overall sexual satisfaction

    The Generic Short Patient Experiences Questionnaire (GS-PEQ): identification of core items from a survey in Norway

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Questionnaires are commonly used to collect patient, or user, experiences with health care encounters; however, their adaption to specific target groups limits comparison between groups. We present the construction of a generic questionnaire (maximum of ten questions) for user evaluation across a range of health care services.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Based on previous testing of six group-specific questionnaires, we first constructed a generic questionnaire with 23 items related to user experiences. All questions included a "not applicable" response option, as well as a follow-up question about the item's importance. Nine user groups from one health trust were surveyed. Seven groups received questionnaires by mail and two by personal distribution. Selection of core questions was based on three criteria: applicability (proportion "not applicable"), importance (mean scores on follow-up questions), and comprehensiveness (content coverage, maximum two items per dimension).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>1324 questionnaires were returned providing subsample sizes ranging from 52 to 323. Ten questions were excluded because the proportion of "not applicable" responses exceeded 20% in at least one user group. The number of remaining items was reduced to ten by applying the two other criteria. The final short questionnaire included items on outcome (2), clinician services (2), user involvement (2), incorrect treatment (1), information (1), organisation (1), and accessibility (1).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The Generic Short Patient Experiences Questionnaire (GS-PEQ) is a short, generic set of questions on user experiences with specialist health care that covers important topics for a range of groups. It can be used alone or with other instruments in quality assessment or in research. The psychometric properties and the relevance of the GS-PEQ in other health care settings and countries need further evaluation.</p

    Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies

    Get PDF

    Improved bleeding profile and tolerability of tibolone versus transdermal E2/NETA treatment in postmenopausal women with female sexual dysfunction

    No full text
    Objectives To compare the incidence of vaginal spotting/bleeding events and breast pain between therapy with tibolone 2.5mg and continuous combined transdermal estradiol (E2)/norethisterone acetate (NETA) 50g/140g after 24 weeks of treatment. Methods A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled trial was performed and assessments were performed at baseline, week 12 and week 24. Bleeding/spotting events were recorded in a daily diary. Breast signs and symptoms were collected as adverse events. Results A total of 403 women (mean age 56 years) were randomized. Bleeding/spotting events during weeks 1-12 with tibolone and E2/NETA were experienced by 16% and 56% of women, respectively (p0.001). The corresponding percentages during weeks 13-24 were 12% and 51%, respectively (p0.001). E2/NETA was significantly more likely than tibolone to be associated with vaginal hemorrhage (11% vs. 0%; p0.001) and breast signs and symptoms (11% vs. 4%; p=0.015). Early discontinuations resulting from adverse events were significantly more common in the E2/NETA group than in the tibolone group (20% vs. 12%), primarily related to withdrawal due to vaginal hemorrhage (8% vs. 0%). Conclusions Tibolone has a significantly better tolerability profile than transdermal E2/NETA as measured by vaginal bleeding, breast pain and treatment continuation
    corecore