7 research outputs found
Distributions of the total minutes of contact between participants, by contact type.
<p>Distributions of the total minutes of contact between participants, by contact type.</p
Floor plan of ED at EUHM. Red dots indicate RFID sensors. Zones are numbered and outlined in blue.
<p>Floor plan of ED at EUHM. Red dots indicate RFID sensors. Zones are numbered and outlined in blue.</p
Cumulative distributions of number of contacts per participant (degree) by contact type.
<p>Cumulative distributions of number of contacts per participant (degree) by contact type.</p
A schematic representation of contact, event, and duration.
<p>The schematic above demonstrates how three individuals (A, B, and C) come into contact with each other over a 10-minute period.</p
Summary of contact characteristics per shift among patients and staff in an Emergency Department, over 81 shifts<sup>1</sup>.
1<p>There were a total of 185 individuals in 81 shifts that did not make a contact while under surveillance. They are not included in these calculations.</p>2<p>The median and quartiles of each shift were calculated and the median of these values are reported. The median of <i>all types</i> will not be the sum of the 3 subtype medians.</p>3<p>All comparisons across groups types were significant by Friedman's test at p<0.0001, except for contact pairs/shift, which was significant at p = 0.004. Tukey's post hoc procedure was used to determine which groups were different and the ordering.</p>4<p>A contact event is defined as any two people being within 1 meter of each other; multiple discontinuous instances between the same two individuals are here counted as multiple contacts.</p>5<p>One contact pair is defined as any two people who have at least one instance of being within 1 meter of each other ( =  an edge or link); multiple discontinuous instances are here counted as a single contact.</p>6<p>Total hours/shift is the sum of all instances of contact. NB: shift duration ranged from 5 to 12 hours.</p
Recommended from our members
The JWST hubble sequence: the rest-frame optical evolution of galaxy structure at 1.5< z <6.5
We present results on the morphological and structural evolution of a total of 3956 galaxies observed with JWST at 1.5 109 M ⊙ at z > 3 are not dominated by irregular and peculiar structures, either visually or quantitatively, as previously thought. We find a strong dominance of morphologically selected disk galaxies up to z = 6 in this mass range. We also find that the stellar mass and star formation rate densities are dominated by disk galaxies up to z ∼ 6, demonstrating that most stars in the Universe were likely formed in a disk galaxy. We compare our results to theory to show that the fraction of types we find is predicted by cosmological simulations, and that the Hubble Sequence was already in place as early as one billion years after the Big Bang. Additionally, we make our visual classifications public for the community.</p
Recommended from our members
EPOCHS IX. When cosmic dawn breaks: Evidence for evolved stellar populations in 7 < z < 12 galaxies from PEARLS GTO and public NIRCam imaging
The presence of evolved stars in high-redshift galaxies can place valuable indirect constraints on the onset of star formation in the Universe. Thus, we use PEARLS GTO (Prime Extragalactic Areas for Reionization and Lensing Science Guaranteed Time Observations) and public NIRCam (Near Infrared Camera) photometric data to search for Balmer-break candidate galaxies at 7 </p